• About
  • podcasts
  • Shop

Surgeons of Horror

~ Dissecting horror films

Surgeons of Horror

Tag Archives: Leatherface

THE CARNIVAL OF CANNIBALS: How The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 Turned Horror into Gallows Horror

21 Friday Aug 2026

Posted by surgeons of horror in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

bill moseley, Leatherface, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, tobe hooper

Fourteen years after The Texas Chain Saw Massacre terrified audiences by making violence feel brutally real, Tobe Hooper returned to Texas and did something that initially appeared almost unthinkable.

He made the nightmare funny.

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 is louder, bloodier, brighter and infinitely more ridiculous than its predecessor. Where the original suffocates, the sequel performs. Where Hooper’s 1974 film traps its audience inside a decaying rural nightmare, Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 opens the doors, turns up the volume and invites us into the circus.

Leatherface now dances.

The family tells jokes.

Victims are mutilated with a level of theatrical excess that borders on cartoon violence.

And the chainsaw, once a terrifying industrial tool, becomes an instrument of performance.

For many viewers, this tonal transformation was a betrayal.

It was also entirely intentional.

The mistake is to assume that Hooper abandoned horror when he introduced comedy. The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 is not less horrific because it is funny.

It is funny because the horror has become so grotesque that laughter becomes another way of responding to it.

And that is where the film becomes far more interesting than a conventional horror comedy.

The Nightmare Becomes a Show

The original Texas Chain Saw Massacre was famously dirty.

Its power came from its documentary-like texture: heat, sweat, decay, animal remains and a sense that the camera had stumbled upon something it should never have witnessed. The film feels discovered rather than designed.

The sequel is the opposite.

Everything is exaggerated.

The colours are stronger.

The violence is bigger.

The performances are broader.

Dennis Hopper’s Lieutenant “Lefty” Enright does not merely seek revenge. He enters the film carrying chainsaws as though preparing for a Wagnerian battle. Bill Moseley’s Chop Top is not simply unstable; he is a carnival barker from hell. Drayton Sawyer has transformed from an anxious family patriarch into the manager of a grotesque enterprise built around murder and barbecue.

And Leatherface is no longer just a figure glimpsed in doorways.

He is a star.

This change is fundamental.

The original film makes the audience feel as though it has accidentally entered the Sawyers’ world.

The sequel makes the Sawyers’ world come out to greet us.

The family has become entertainment.

The Chainsaw as Punchline

One of the strangest achievements of Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 is the way Hooper transforms the chainsaw from an object of pure terror into something approaching a comic instrument.

This does not make it harmless.

Quite the opposite.

The chainsaw remains capable of horrific violence, but its excess becomes part of the joke. When Lefty and Leatherface engage in their infamous chainsaw duel, the scene operates simultaneously as action, horror, parody and absurdist comedy.

Two men are not simply fighting.

They are fencing with chainsaws.

The image is so excessive that the audience has nowhere comfortable to place its reaction.

Should we be thrilled?

Should we recoil?

Should we laugh?

Hooper’s answer appears to be: yes.

That collision of responses is the film’s central achievement.

A traditional horror comedy creates a recognisable rhythm between fear and laughter. A frightening moment is followed by a joke. A comic character enters a dangerous situation. The audience moves between emotional registers.

Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 is more unstable.

The horror and the comedy often occupy the same image.

That is a very different experience.

The laughter does not arrive after the fear has passed.

It arrives inside it.

The Family Business Goes Public

If The Texas Chain Saw Massacre examined the collapse of a family whose violent labour had become obsolete, the sequel imagines what happens when that family adapts.

The Sawyers become entrepreneurs.

Drayton sells barbecue.

The connection between meat and murder, only implied in the original, becomes a grotesque joke. Capitalism has found a way to absorb the family’s particular talents.

They are no longer merely surviving in isolation.

They have entered the marketplace.

That development makes Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 a considerably stranger companion to the original than it first appears.

The first film presents the Sawyers as remnants of an abandoned America.

The second suggests that America has found a use for them after all.

Everything can become a product.

Even cannibalism.

Even murder.

Even Leatherface.

The family no longer needs to hide from the world.

The world is now prepared to buy what they are selling.

The Grotesque Family

Hooper’s genius was to understand that the Sawyer family could only remain terrifying for so long if they were treated as a static collection of monsters.

So he allowed them to become ridiculous.

This is not the same as making them sympathetic.

Chop Top remains dangerous. Drayton remains cruel. Leatherface remains capable of appalling violence.

But the film permits us to see their absurdity.

They squabble.

They compete.

They misunderstand one another.

They complain about money and family obligations.

They are monstrous because they are recognisable.

The sequel amplifies this idea until it becomes grotesque theatre.

The family has become a dysfunctional sitcom from hell.

And that phrase matters because the comedy does not diminish the horror. It exposes a different kind of horror: the possibility that atrocity can become ordinary once we become familiar with the people committing it.

The Sawyers are terrifying.

The Sawyers are ridiculous.

Those two statements are never allowed to cancel one another out.

The Birth of Gallows Horror

There is a particular kind of laughter that emerges when horror becomes too grotesque to process in a straightforward way.

It is not laughter because something is safe.

It is laughter because the alternative response has become unbearable.

A joke told at a funeral does not make death less serious. Sometimes it acknowledges the seriousness of death more honestly than solemnity can. It recognises the absurdity of being human in the face of something we cannot control.

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 understands this instinct instinctively.

Its violence becomes so exaggerated, its characters so manic and its situations so absurd that laughter becomes a survival mechanism.

The audience laughs at the abyss because the abyss has become too ridiculous not to.

This is what I call Gallows Horror.

Not simply horror with jokes.

Not simply comedy coated in blood.

Gallows Horror occupies the uncomfortable territory where horror, absurdity and laughter become inseparable. The laughter does not neutralise the horror. It intensifies it. We laugh, then realise that we have laughed at something genuinely appalling.

And that moment of recognition is where the discomfort lives.

Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 is one of the great expressions of this sensibility.

It asks us to laugh at the Sawyer family while never allowing us to forget what they are.

Leatherface Learns to Dance

Perhaps no character better embodies the sequel’s transformation than Leatherface himself.

In 1974, Leatherface was frightening partly because he was unknowable. His masks, behaviour and panic suggested a person whose identity had been fractured by the demands of the family around him.

In 1986, that fractured identity becomes theatrical.

Leatherface is playful.

He is confused.

He is sexually curious.

He performs.

His interactions with Stretch are uncomfortable precisely because they complicate the traditional monster-and-victim relationship without making it less dangerous. Hooper appears fascinated by the absurdity of masculinity and performance, turning Leatherface’s chainsaw into an instrument of grotesque courtship.

The result is one of the most bizarre sequences in American horror.

It is funny.

It is disturbing.

It is sexual.

It is threatening.

And none of those responses can be cleanly separated from one another.

That is Gallows Horror in miniature.

The audience is invited to laugh at Leatherface’s behaviour even while recognising the profound danger of the situation. The comedy increases the discomfort because it destabilises our moral position.

We should be horrified.

Why are we laughing?

America Gets Louder

The transformation from The Texas Chain Saw Massacre to its sequel also mirrors a broader cultural shift.

The original emerged from a decade of social anxiety and industrial disillusionment. Its nightmare was one of decay.

By the mid-1980s, America had become louder.

Consumer culture was louder.

Television was louder.

Politics was louder.

Violence in popular culture was louder.

The horror sequel belongs to that excess.

It is full of neon, radio broadcasts, advertisements, chainsaws and noise. Even its villains appear to have been turned up beyond any reasonable level.

The Sawyers are no longer the discarded remains of an old America.

They are a product of the new one.

This is why the sequel’s carnival atmosphere matters. The title family has become a travelling sideshow, a grotesque American attraction hidden beneath the highways and amusement parks of modern Texas.

Hooper takes the country’s appetite for spectacle and feeds it back to the audience as human flesh.

Dennis Hopper and the Madness of Escalation

Then there is Dennis Hopper.

Lefty Enright is perhaps the sequel’s most obvious declaration that restraint has been abandoned.

He purchases chainsaws as though arming himself for mythological combat. He storms the family’s underground lair with the intensity of a man entering hell. By the time he begins attacking the walls themselves with a chainsaw, the film has reached a level of absurdity that could only exist inside this particular universe.

And yet Hopper plays the madness with complete conviction.

That commitment is essential.

The film never works if the actors appear to be standing outside the joke. The comedy emerges because everyone treats the insanity as though it matters.

Lefty’s grief is real.

His rage is real.

The chainsaw battle is also completely ridiculous.

Again, the two truths coexist.

Gallows Horror requires that tension.

The absurdity must not erase the stakes.

Laughing at the Abyss

There is a reason The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 has aged into something more interesting than its initial reception suggested.

The film was not attempting to repeat the original.

It understood that repetition would have been the real betrayal.

You cannot recreate the feeling of accidentally discovering the unthinkable once the audience already knows what is inside the house.

So Hooper did the next most dangerous thing.

He opened the house wider.

He showed us more.

He made the monsters talk.

He made them dance.

And he made us laugh.

That laughter is not an escape from the horror of the first film. It is what happens when the horror becomes familiar enough to require a new response.

Once the monster becomes an icon, the filmmaker must find another way to make it strange.

Hooper found absurdity.

The Prognosis:

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 is not a failed attempt to recreate The Texas Chain Saw Massacre.

It is a refusal to try.

Tobe Hooper understood that the original had already trapped audiences inside its nightmare. Returning to the same darkness would have meant repeating an experience that could never again be unexpected.

So he transformed the nightmare into a carnival.

The violence became bigger.

The performances became broader.

The family became funnier.

And somehow, through all that grotesque excess, the horror remained.

That is the strange brilliance of Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2. It understands that laughter and terror are not opposites. Sometimes laughter is what emerges when terror has nowhere else to go.

This is Gallows Horror.

The point at which the grotesque becomes absurd, the absurd becomes funny and the laughter itself becomes uncomfortable.

We laugh at Leatherface.

We laugh at Chop Top.

We laugh at Lefty attacking the walls with a chainsaw.

Then, perhaps a moment later, we remember what we are watching.

People are being murdered.

Bodies are being mutilated.

A family is eating human beings.

And we’re still laughing.

That is the abyss Hooper opens beneath Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2.

The joke is that there is no joke.

There is only horror pushed so far beyond reason that the human response begins to break down.

And perhaps that is why the sequel has become increasingly fascinating with age.

The original showed us America as a slaughterhouse.

The sequel showed us the slaughterhouse selling tickets.

Welcome to the carnival.

  • Saul Muerte

THE MACHINE THAT ATE AMERICA: Why The Texas Chain Saw Massacre Still Feels Like an American Nightmare

17 Monday Aug 2026

Posted by surgeons of horror in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Leatherface, the texas chain saw massacre, tobe hooper

There is a temptation, fifty-two years after its release, to reduce The Texas Chain Saw Massacre to its most recognisable image.

A mask made of human skin.

A chainsaw.

A screaming woman.

Leatherface has become one of horror cinema’s great icons, a figure so deeply embedded within popular culture that it can now be difficult to remember just how strange Tobe Hooper’s film initially was. Yet to focus entirely on Leatherface is to mistake the face of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre for its body.

Hooper’s masterpiece is not fundamentally about a monster.

It is about a system.

Its true horror lies in the discovery that the violence encountered by Sally Hardesty and her friends has not emerged from some supernatural void. It belongs to a world with an economy, a history, a family structure and a working methodology. The Sawyer household is not simply a collection of madmen waiting in the wilderness to attack unsuspecting teenagers. It is the grotesque remnant of an America that has industrialised violence, discarded its workers and then abandoned those left behind.

The house is horrifying because it is not irrational.

It is organised.

The End of the Slaughterhouse

The economic history of the Sawyer family hangs over the film even when it is not explicitly foregrounded.

The old man at the graveyard speaks of grave robbing as though he were discussing an old-fashioned form of local employment. The Hitchhiker collects photographs and scraps, turning the dead into souvenirs. Drayton Sawyer runs his decrepit petrol station and barbecue business. Grandpa was once celebrated for his skill at slaughtering cattle.

Again and again, The Texas Chain Saw Massacre returns to labour.

The family kills because killing is what they know.

But their knowledge belongs to an older America. Industrial change has made their particular skills obsolete. The slaughterhouse no longer requires the intimate violence of a man with a hammer. Machines can do the work faster, cleaner and more efficiently.

The Sawyers have been replaced.

And that replacement matters.

Hooper and co-writer Kim Henkel do not present the family as aristocratic degenerates living outside civilisation. They are workers without work. Their violence is not detached from American industry; it is its grotesque continuation.

The cattle have simply been replaced by people.

That idea transforms the film’s violence. Leatherface does not stalk his victims with the theatrical precision of a traditional movie monster. He works.

When Kirk enters the house, Leatherface kills him quickly and drags the body away. Pam receives the same treatment. There is no prolonged speech, no ritualised pursuit and no self-conscious display of villainy. Leatherface’s brutality has an almost mechanical efficiency.

The victims arrive.

The job is done.

The next body follows.

It is one of the most unsettling things about the film: murder is treated as labour.

The Family Business

This is why the Sawyer family remains more disturbing than the individual members who inhabit it.

Leatherface is frightening, but he is not independent. The Hitchhiker is sadistic, yet his sadism exists within the wider structure of the household. Drayton appears comparatively rational until we realise that his version of rationality involves managing murder as though it were a difficult family business.

Everyone has a role.

Grandpa, the patriarch, represents the older tradition. He is the memory of what the family once was. Drayton maintains the household and attempts, with increasingly desperate authority, to keep everything functioning. The Hitchhiker appears to be responsible for procurement, surveillance and the unsettling rituals surrounding the bodies. Leatherface does the physical work.

Even the domestic arrangements are grotesquely recognisable.

They argue.

They complain.

They blame one another.

They worry about money.

They disagree about how things should be done.

The famous dinner sequence is terrifying partly because it resembles a family gathering distorted beyond recognition. Sally has not stumbled into the lair of an incomprehensible evil. She has been forced into someone else’s family home and seated at their table.

That is far worse.

The Sawyers have not rejected the idea of family.

They have preserved it.

They have simply preserved it after every other moral structure has decayed.

America as Meat

The title itself has always promised more than the film delivers.

There is no actual chainsaw massacre in the conventional sense. The chainsaw is an instrument of terror, but Hooper’s film is not structured around an extended slaughter. Its title is more suggestive than descriptive, combining industry and violence into a single American image.

Texas.

Chainsaw.

Massacre.

Each word carries a particular mythology.

Texas represents scale, frontier identity, independence and American excess. The chainsaw is a machine designed to cut through organic matter. A massacre is the language of war.

Hooper brings those ideas together and places them inside an apparently ordinary story about five young people travelling through rural Texas.

The contrast is crucial.

The horror does not begin in some distant, unknowable realm. It begins on the road.

The characters pass through decaying towns, abandoned buildings and landscapes that appear to have been left behind by modern America. The petrol station is still there, but its function is uncertain. The house remains standing, but the family inside it no longer belongs to the world outside.

The country has moved on.

The Sawyers have not.

They have become cultural debris.

And like much of what America leaves behind, they have not disappeared quietly.

The Great American Discard

What makes The Texas Chain Saw Massacre so powerful is its sense that the nightmare extends beyond the boundaries of the Sawyer house.

Hooper does not explain every detail. He doesn’t need to.

The film’s world already feels contaminated before Leatherface appears. The desecrated graveyard, the dead animals, the unsettling encounters on the road and the decaying rural landscape all suggest a society in which something has gone wrong long before the teenagers arrive.

The Sawyers are not an interruption.

They are a symptom.

This is where the film’s American nightmare becomes particularly potent. The United States has always been fascinated by progress, reinvention and expansion. Yet progress produces casualties. When industries modernise, people lose their livelihoods. When communities disappear, those left behind do not simply vanish with them.

The Texas Chain Saw Massacre takes that anxiety to its most grotesque conclusion.

What if the people America no longer needs simply continue doing the work they were trained to do?

What if the machinery of violence survives after the machinery of society has abandoned it?

The Sawyers continue slaughtering because slaughter is the only language their world has taught them to speak.

Leatherface as Worker

This interpretation also changes the way we see Leatherface.

Over decades of sequels, remakes, reimaginings and franchise mythology, Leatherface has increasingly been isolated as the central villain of the Texas Chainsaw universe. The icon has gradually replaced the character.

But in Hooper’s original film, Leatherface is almost impossible to separate from the house around him.

He wears different masks for different social functions. One mask is practical. Another is domestic. Another suggests a grotesque attempt at femininity and hospitality. Leatherface is not simply hiding his identity. He appears to be performing identities that the family requires from him.

He is worker.

He is cook.

He is homemaker.

He is butcher.

The masks are costumes in a family play that Leatherface has been performing for so long that the distinction between person and role has collapsed.

That is what makes him unexpectedly tragic.

Leatherface is certainly violent, but the film does not present him as an autonomous force of evil in the manner of later slasher villains. When intruders enter the house, he panics. He reacts. He performs the function he has been taught to perform.

Kill the intruder.

Dispose of the body.

Return to work.

The chainsaw is not a symbol of Leatherface’s personality.

It is a tool.

And that is considerably more frightening.

The Violence of the Ordinary

Perhaps the most enduring achievement of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre is the way it makes violence feel ordinary.

There is surprisingly little explicit gore. The title promises carnage, but Hooper largely denies the audience the spectacle of it. What remains is suggestion: the sound of the hammer, the convulsions of the body, the industrial clatter of the house.

The film understands that imagination can make violence feel more authentic than explicit display.

Yet the restraint also reinforces the film’s central idea.

This is not violence performed for pleasure.

It is violence performed because it is part of the routine.

The Sawyers eat.

They work.

They argue.

They kill.

The distinction between these activities has become almost meaningless.

That collapse is what turns the dinner sequence into one of the most unbearable scenes in horror cinema. Sally is not simply threatened with death. She is absorbed into the machinery of the household.

She becomes part of the family business.

The family needs her to participate. They need her terror. They need another body.

Even Grandpa’s attempted killing is framed as a matter of professional pride. The old man was once good at this. He was once the best.

Now he can barely hold the hammer.

The family is witnessing the collapse of its own tradition.

It is grotesque.

It is horrifying.

And it is strangely sad.

The Machine That Ate Itself

The great irony of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre is that the family represents a system ultimately consuming itself.

Industrial slaughter has made the Sawyers obsolete, yet the family responds by applying its industrial logic to human beings. They preserve the methods but lose the product. They inherit the machinery of violence but no longer possess a legitimate place to use it.

So the machine turns inward.

America begins eating itself.

The title’s massacre is therefore not simply an act of violence. It is an economic nightmare.

The Sawyers are what remains when labour loses its purpose but not its habits.

This is why the film continues to feel so unsettling. Leatherface may have become an icon, but the world that created him has not disappeared. Economic displacement, industrial decay, rural isolation and the anxiety surrounding who gets left behind remain deeply embedded within modern society.

If anything, the questions Hooper’s film raises have become more complicated.

Progress still produces casualties.

Industries still discard workers.

Communities still disappear.

And the people left behind are too often treated as though they have vanished simply because the rest of the country has stopped looking at them.

The Prognosis:

The Texas Chain Saw Massacre endures because it refuses to reduce horror to a single monster.

Leatherface is frightening.

The chainsaw is frightening.

The house is frightening.

But the true nightmare lies in the machinery connecting them.

The Sawyer family is a grotesque parody of the American household, built from labour, tradition, commerce and violence. They have inherited a world that no longer has any use for them, but they continue operating according to the only rules they understand.

They slaughter.

They consume.

They survive.

And somewhere inside that decaying house, America discovers that the monster it fears is not an invader from outside.

It is the thing left behind when progress moves on.

The Texas Chain Saw Massacre is not simply about a family of cannibals.

It is about a culture capable of turning human beings into meat.

That is why, more than half a century later, the film still feels less like a nightmare from another world than an American nightmare staring back at itself.

And when Leatherface finally bursts from the house, chainsaw screaming beneath the Texas sun, he is not merely chasing Sally Hardesty.

He is chasing a world that has already left him behind.

  • Saul Muerte

Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation (1995) – A Chainsaw Out of Gas

11 Tuesday Mar 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

kim henkel, Leatherface, matthew mcconaughey, renee zellweger, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, the texas chain saw massacre

In horror history, few franchises have endured such wild tonal shifts as The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and Kim Henkel’s The Next Generation (1995) might be the most baffling entry of them all. Written and directed by Henkel—who co-wrote Tobe Hooper’s original 1974 masterpiece—this supposed return to the series’ unhinged roots instead devolves into an exhausting, shrill spectacle, where madness replaces tension and anarchy is mistaken for horror.

The film’s only real legacy today is the early casting of Matthew McConaughey and Renée Zellweger, two future Academy Award winners whose performances stand out, but for wildly different reasons. McConaughey, as the leg-braced psychopath Vilmer Slaughter, is the one genuine source of energy in the film. He throws himself into the role with a manic intensity, chewing through scenery (and remote controls) like a man possessed. Zellweger, on the other hand, delivers a grounded, earnest performance that feels completely at odds with the film’s overblown absurdity. Watching her endure the relentless torment of Vilmer’s twisted family feels more punishing than thrilling—any sense of fun gets smothered beneath the weight of its chaos.

Henkel clearly aims to recapture the raw hysteria of the original, pushing the grotesque family dynamic to its extremes. However, without any sense of pacing or release, the film quickly becomes an overwhelming, screeching endurance test. There’s no reprieve from the relentless shouting, violence, and nonsensical plotting. Even Leatherface—one of horror’s most iconic figures—is reduced to a parody of himself, shrieking in drag and stripped of any real menace.

By the time the infamous “Illuminati subplot” emerges, with cryptic government figures suggesting Leatherface’s crimes are part of some grander conspiracy, it’s clear the film has fully derailed. What’s meant to be a meta-commentary on horror instead feels like a desperate attempt to inject meaning into an already incoherent mess.

The Prognosis:

For all its flaws, The Next Generation is at least memorable in its sheer lunacy. But as a horror film, it fails to provide genuine suspense or even dark humour—just a grating, exhausting descent into noise. McConaughey’s unhinged performance keeps it from being entirely unwatchable, but much like Vilmer’s malfunctioning mechanical leg, the film jerks and sputters without ever finding its footing.

  • Saul Muerte

Movie review: Texas Chainsaw Massacre

18 Friday Feb 2022

Posted by surgeons of horror in Movie review

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

alice krige, david blue garcia, elsie fisher, fede alvarez, ian henkel, jacob latimore, jesica allain, kim henkel, Leatherface, legendary pictures, mark burnham, moe dunford, nell hudson, netflix, olwen fouere, pat cassidy, sarah yarkin, Texas Chainsaw Massacre

The problem with the Texas Chainsaw Massacre franchise is… Leatherface.

What? I hear you bellow and cry? Texas Chainsaw Massacre is Leatherface and that is precisely my point. Having Leatherface as the poster icon for these slasher, body torture flicks has dampened the menace that the original 1974 Tobe Hooper feature had. The torment doesn’t lie with just his heightened and physical presence but with his entire f@#$ed up family.

Family or some sense of family has been key amongst this franchise and to unsettle this dynamic leads to ruin for any who encounter it. This is evident in Hooper’s sequel, albeit through a dark comedy gaze. It’s following sequels tried to replicate this energy but somehow missed the mark and since then the franchise has had more jump starts than a shitbox car with a malfunctioning alternator.

Leatherface is iconic for a reason but without his family support network around (as dysfunctional as they all are) he will either do one of two things, become a hermit, isolated in his own filth and depravation, or become a loose cannon, destroying everything in his path. This latest feature aims for the latter and for good reason as it has become such a winning formula for David Gordon Green’s Halloween franchise revival.

There was some promise in this latest release with Directing Auteur Fede Alvarez behind the resurrection, serving as producer, and teaming up with the original writers Pat Cassidy, Ian and Kim Henkel only added to the integrity.

Legendary Pictures who had secured the rights to the franchise were putting their trust in relative newcomer David Blue Garcia with his sophomore outing in the directors chair for a feature length movie.

The focus for the film would have Leatherface holed up in a house for troubled youths, only now the only occupant along with a mother-like figure who ran what was the facility, played by the fantastic Alice Krige. The rest of the place has become a ghost town filled with dilapidated buildings and the vision of a group of influencers hoping to transform this Texas town into a bustling business venture. Cue potential victims for Leatherface to rip through as these gentrifiers get more than they bargained for.

The issue is that there’s a half-baked idea going on here, and it rests too highly on the success and brutality of Halloween (2018) to fuel Leatherface’s rage, thrusting him solely in the centre of the carnage. When the movie does go for barbarity, it often hits the right notes of repulsion but too often it falls foul of old horror tropes, having it’s leads either hiding in the closet and  under the bed or trying to kick ass against the monster.

TCM even tries to replicate the harshness that trauma has on our heroines, that featured so heavily in Halloween by having one of the leads, Lila (Elsie Fisher) a survivor of a school killing massacre. This is brought in double fold by bringing back Sally Hardesty, this time played by Olwen Fouere, to tap into the whole hardened survivor ala Jamie Lee Curtis as Laurie Strode.

Another example however that the filmmakers are content in playing familiar notes and resting on the laurels that the Texas Chainsaw Massacre name and that of its emblematic figure Leatherface brings.

The prognosis:

This latest version is aimed at a new generation of audience.

Too often though, it falls prey to the usual horror tropes and offers nothing new.

Leatherface does go full on with the kill count though going Michael Myers with some brutal deaths, especially with the bus scene which was highly satisfying.

It also had some moments of humour that didn’t necessarily hit the mark.

For veteran horror fans hoping to see some descent bloodshed will feel satiated, but ultimately let down by the lack in depth to the fold as the film struggles to add any flesh to it’s now frail bones.

The rust has truly taken hold in this franchise and it might be too hard to get that chainsaw whirring to satisfaction again without some bold new approach.

– Saul Muerte

Top 18 Movies the Surgeons team can’t wait to go under the knife

25 Thursday Jan 2018

Posted by surgeons of horror in News article

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

a quiet place, aimee mullins, alien:covenant, Amityville: The Awakening, amy irving, Annabelle:Creation, annihilation, anya taylor joy, before i wake, blumhouse, cadaver, cargo, cate blanchett, christina hendricks, claire foy, corin hardy, danny mcbride, david gordon green, eli roth, emily blunt, game of thrones, gerald's game, Get Out, green inferno, Halloween, helen mirren, hellraiser:Judgement, hounds of love, insidious: the last key, It, it comes at night, jack black, Jamie Lee Curtis, jason statham, Jeepers Creepers 3, jennifer jason leigh, johannes roberts, john krasinski, Joshua Leonard, juno temple, Leatherface, lin shaye, maisie williams, mother!, natalie portman, nick frost, olivia munn, Patient Zero, rafe spall, Raw, shane black, simon pegg, slaughterhouse rulez, Split, stephen soderbergh, stranger things, Suspiria, the autopsy of jane doe, The Babysitter, the conjuring, The Conjuring 2, the god particle, the Hallow, the house with a clock in its walls, the lodgers, the marshes, the meg, the new mutants, The Nun, the predator, the ritual, the strangers 2, the witch, thelma, thomas jane, thorughbreds, tom hardy, truth or dare, unsane, venom, winchester

2017 proved to be a mammoth year in horror, with the likes of Get Out, It, and Annabelle: Creation causing waves of elation and that’s not to forget some awesome movies that rippled beneath the surface, including Gerald’s Game, Hounds of Love, Raw, The Marshes, mother!, and The Babysitter.

What does this mean to the genre as a whole? It can spell good news as the movie business see success and a money opportunity to exploit this genre to the bone.
This could mean an outpour of horrendous carbon copy movies that will grate to the bone, but it can’t be as bad as Amityville: The Awakening, Leatherface, or Jeepers Creepers 3 right?

But let’s not be too hasty on the negative-front. What does look promising is that we could very well get some fine horror films churning out over the coming years.

So with that in mind, the team stitched our collective minds together and come up with 18 of the most anticipated horror movies coming out that we would love to bring into the operating theatre and splice them wide open.

Annihilation

23 Feb / 12 Mar via Netflix

Directed by Alex Garland and starring Natalie Portman, Jennifer Jason Leigh, and Oscar Isaac looks off the dial.
The fact that it has been picked up by Netflix for a release some 17 days after its cinematic release has left some people scratching their heads as to whether or not this film has merit, but that’s old school thinking.
We at Surgeons see this at as a bold attempt at a streaming company to make their move onto the big arena.
If the trailer is anything to go by this film could be a massive hit and shape up the distribution method in a big way.

Cadaver

23 Aug

Some may instantly see comparisons with The Autopsy of Jane Doe with this one, but this story of a city cop fresh out of rehab, who takes up a role at the city hospital morgue, could very well be a trippy affair, where sanity is on the line.

Halloween

19 Oct

You’d be remiss to neglect this one on the list. With the return of Jamie Lee Curtis and Nick Castle in their respective roles, alongside the creative minds of David Gordon Green and Danny McBride, can we finally see Michael Myers rampaging his way that will delight and reignite the franchise once more?
Here’s hoping.

The House With A Clock In Its Walls

21 Sep

Cate Blanchett and Jack Black lead the charge in Eli Roth’s latest feature about a young orphan and his magical uncle who go in search of a clock that could bring about the end of the world.
Could we see a return of fantasy horror on the big screen? Can Roth extend his bloody touch to go beyond the success of Green Inferno?

Insidious: The Last Key

8 Feb – Australian release

Whilst this has already been released in the States, the Surgeons team who are based in Australia, need to wait with eager anticipation for Elise Rainer and her team of ghost hunters to delve into the Further once more.
Early reports suggest that Lin Shaye continues to impress in her role, but that the franchise may have run its course. We’ll have to wait and see before we cast our thoughts on the latest addition to the franchise.

The Lodgers

23 Feb

2015’s release of The Witch and its success may have reawakened that love of folk horror, which has been embedded in British culture with the likes of The Wicker Man, Witchfinder General, and Blood on Satan’s Claw, has some of our team intrigued by this latest offering.
Set in 1920’s Ireland, a twin brother and sister must endure a sinister presence with a strong hold over them that may result in turning them against one another with drastic circumstances.

The Meg

23 Aug

Movies don’t get bigger than this one.

Sorry couldn’t resist that.

Whether you like him or not Jason Statham has a habit of packing a punch when it comes to ‘balls to the wall, testosterone-fuelled action movies.

Now he must come face-to-face come face to face with a 70-foot shark.

“You’re gonna need a bigger air tank.”

The New Mutants

12 Apr

When Logan was released and with the success that followed, Marvel were then faced with the enterprise of a much darker world.

In steps, The New Mutants which sees Anya Taylor-Joy (The Witch, Split) and Maisie Williams (Game of Thrones) among the imprisoned young mutants as they discover their new-found abilities and potential salvation.

It’s a good cast, but will it deliver?

The Nun

12 Jul

Speaking of franchises, The Conjuring universe continues to expand and haunt in more delectable ways to terrify our souls with the much-anticipated return of Valak.

In this instance, Rome is our setting and Father Burke is sent to investigate the mysterious death of a nun. Burke played by Demian Bichir, who I hope is given more time to flex his acting muscles compared to his under-used performance in Ridley Scott’s Alien: Covenant.

Gary Dauberman from It, Annabelle:Creation, and The Conjuring 2 is back on board to write the screenplay, so expect similar twists, turns, and scares to arise.

In addition, Corin Hardy steps in to direct, who oversaw the surprisingly decent The Hallow from a few years back and has been given the vote of confidence to resurrect The Crow, starring Jason Mamoa.

The Predator

2 Aug

Becoming something of the lesser cousin to the Alien franchise, The Predator universe has never managed to really make a dent beyond its original Arnie feature, which surprises as it is ripe full of potential.

One of the original stars Shane Black is on to direct, so you could argue that there isn’t anyone closer to the source to re-capture the magic of the first film, and he has proven success with Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang and Iron Man 3, but is that enough to win over fans and the many?

The additions of Oliva Munn, and Thomas Jane, who has had a something of a career comeback with Before I Wake, and 1922 of late, could very well help cement this together.

A Quiet Place

3 May

Where some were left aggrieved following the screening of It Comes At Night, (which is probably the best example of false advertising when it comes to luring your audience in – as an aside its actually a pretty decent and intense movie, just not how it was promoted) will no doubt have their needs met in this movie, which promises an intense and horrific ordeal.

John Krasinski directs and stars in his passion project alongside Emily Blunt as part of a family forced to live in silence from an unknown threat that will attack with the slightest noise.

The Ritual

9 Feb – on Netflix

Another example of how Netflix continue to become a force in the movie market, and another example of folk horror entering into the scene.

The Ritual stars Rafe Spall as a man with a damaged, who joins a group of friends on a camping expedition in the forest only to discover that they are not alone.

Slaughterhouse Rulez

7 Sep

Much discussion has been surrounding this project due to the re-collaboration of Simon Pegg and Nick Frost (Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz) who both star in and produce this movie.

The story centres on a boarding school that unleashes all hell when a mysterious sinkhole emerges.
Cue comedy and bloody mayhem.

 

The Strangers 2: Prey at Night

9 Mar

The first film had horror fans divided – a bit like vegemite, you either love it, or hate it. For those that fell into the former category, they can rejoice as the trio of masked psychopaths return to reek havoc on some more prey.

The cast includes Christina Hendricks (Mad Men, The Neon Demon) and Martin Henderson (The Ring, Everest) and is directed by Johannes Roberts (47 Meters Down, The Other Side of the Door) but don’t let that sway you as he also helmed the magnificent F, and if he could tap the rage and anarchy unleashed in that movie, we could have a surprise hit on our hands.

Truth or Dare

3 May

Horror production giants, Blumhouse, who have been partly responsible for the rise in recent genre movies will be hoping to keep the trend going and repeat their successes of Get Out, and Happy Death Day.

Truth or Dare follows a group of friends who play a deadly version of said game when those that break the rules start a meet a grisly end.

Unsane

23 Mar

Critically praised film director, Steven Soderbergh enters the horror arena with his usual approach to exploring different filming techniques, in this instance shooting the entire film on an iPhone camera.

The cast is also impressive with Claire Foy (The Crown), entering a mental institution and once again reality comes into question. Foy is accompanied by Juno Temple (Horns), Aimee Mullins (Stranger Things), Amy Irving (Carrie) and Joshua Leonard (The Blair Witch Project).

Venom

5 Oct

If The New Mutants is going to push the boundaires of darkness in the Marvel universe, then Venom will surely rip that apart and enter whole new level of insanity.

With Tom Hardy taking on the titular character, you can expect some hefty weight in the acting department.
It’s a project that is shrouded in secrecy at the moment and just a few screenshots that have been handed out to the media. Lets hope that it will be worth the wait.

Winchester

22 Feb

Helen Mirren takes on the role of Lady Winchester house, heiress to the Winchester firearms, who becomes obsessed with building a house to trap ghosts with one of the most obscure architecture ever built.

From the creative minds of the Spierig Brothers (Undead, Daybreakers), this movie could be hit or miss.

Notable recommendations

Cargo, The God Particle, Hellraiser: Judgement, Patient Zero, Suspiria (remake), Thelma, Thoroughbreds

  • Saul Muerte

Movie review: Leatherface

26 Thursday Oct 2017

Posted by surgeons of horror in Movie review

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

horror films, Horror movies, Leatherface, Lili Taylor, Stephen Dorff, surgeons of horror, Texas Chainsaw Massacre

Arguably back in 1974, the first iconic horror villain was born in the guise of Chainsaw wielding, human mask wielding psycho we come to know as Leatherface.

Director Tobe Hooper brought him to the screen along with other members of his deranged family who set out to terrorise a group of travellers in the middle of Texas.
Unwittingly, the final shots of Leatherface wielding said weapon of choice as the Sun begins to rise and our final girl makes good her escape has been embedded into the psyche of horror fans across the world.
The fact that it has resonated with so many has lead to numerous sequels and reboots. (7 in total)

This latest effort from directors Julien Maury and Alexandre Bustillo was to do the inevitable origin story. (Yawn)
When will creative’s realise that there is nothing to be gained from unearthing the make up of these classic horror villains other than to destroy that mystery and the magic that made them so special to begin with?

The warning signs were already there when the production studios kept pushing back the release date despite Lili Taylor and Stephen Dorff being attached to the project.
Taylor more than held her own in James Wan’s The Conjuring and although Dorff has fallen out of favour in Hollywood and no longer considered A-list material, he still in my mind had plenty of gravitas on screen.
None of this can prevent this movie from feeling like being fed through the meat grinder using nothing but gristle.

There’s so much focus on trying to show how Jedidah Sawyer becomes the titular character that the filmmakers lose sight of any real substance.
As such we’re spoon fed Jedidiah’s journey from a brutal mother (Taylor) who is forcing him to tow the line with the family way, which just so happens to include brutally murdering a guy with (wait for it…) a Chainsaw.

When he and his brother (who in my opinion looked more like our signature Leatherface than Jedidiah did) are separated from their family by a vengeful Texas Ranger (Dorff) and whisked away to a mental hospital.
What follows is a riot that leads to Jedidiah escaping with a few other inmates and a nurse as hostage to make his way home.

The result feels like a story ripped from the pages of The Devil’s Rejects which is absolutely ridiculous when you consider that film has whispers of TCM throughout as something of a nod from Zombie.

Of course Jedidiah will have his fall from grace but this transition seems so sudden and out of left field, which is a shame as once again we’re left with poor character development in the screenplay.

The Diagnosis:
More PVC than Leatherface as this latest instalment struggles to make an impact on this already loose franchise.

  • Paul Farrell 

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016

Categories

  • A Night of Horror Film Festival
  • Alien franchise
  • Alliance Francaise French Film Festival
  • Australian Horror
  • Best Movies and Shows
  • Competition
  • dark nights film fest
  • episode review
  • Flashback Fridays
  • Friday the 13th Franchise
  • Full Moon Sessions
  • Halloween franchise
  • In Memorium
  • Interview
  • japanese film festival
  • John Carpenter
  • killer pigs
  • Library of the Occult
  • midwest weirdfest
  • MidWest WierdFest
  • MonsterFest
  • movie article
  • movie of the week
  • Movie review
  • New Trailer
  • News article
  • podcast episode
  • podcast review
  • press release
  • retrospective
  • Rialto Distribution
  • Ring Franchise
  • series review
  • Sounds of Horror
  • Soundtracks
  • Spanish horror
  • sydney film festival
  • Sydney Underground Film Festival
  • The Blair Witch Franchise
  • the conjuring franchise
  • the evil dead franchise
  • The Exorcist
  • the fly
  • The Howling franchise
  • Top 10 list
  • Top 12 List
  • top 13 films
  • Trash Night Tuesdays on Tubi
  • umbrella entertainment
  • Uncategorized
  • Universal Horror
  • Wes Craven
  • wes craven's the scream years

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Surgeons of Horror
    • Join 226 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Surgeons of Horror
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar