Tag Archives: movies

M3GAN 2.0 (2025): She’s Back, Taller, and Still Twisting

07 Monday Jul 2025

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Me-Three-Gan Two.

The sequel we all knew was coming. And yes, we will be referring to our checklist of what makes a good sequel, but that aside, is this outing any good, and was it necessary?

From memory the last movie (reviewed and podcasted by me and Chris Dawes) was definitely ripe for franchising. So straight away we’re not in Matrix territory where the question “Why!? Just why!??” isn’t screaming in your head every few minutes.

In 2.0 we pick up two years after the last movie, where Megan’s creator – Gemma (Allison Williams) and her niece Cady (her name is Cady!?? The whole time you swear they’re calling her “Katie!) played by Violet McGraw – are continuing their lives as the only family each one of them has. Except now Gemma is a staunch and vocal advocate for AI regulation due to her knee-jerk reaction to being almost killed by a robot AI (of her own making, it should be said) and Cady (in turn) is following in her aunts’ footsteps (of sorts) by being a computer science nerd.

In an overcompensating effort by Gemma, she ensures Cady takes Akido lessons so she can defend herself. Unfortunately Cady takes those lessons to an unwanted extreme by regarding Steven Segal as a martial arts poster boy, and one beaten up school bully later, Cady gets in trouble; Gemma is at her wits end, and we soon realise life between them is full of tension. For Gemma still punishes herself for putting Cady in harm’s (Megan’s) way, and Cady hates on Gemma for… reasons. She’s a teenager now, so it’s Hollywood lore she be a little bitch to any authority figure in her life. To be honest, you kinda zone out when you go through their motivations ‘cause you’re keen for the Megan goodness to begin.

And that gets kick started by the presence of another killer robot named Ameila (played by NOT Olsen sister, Ivanna Sakhno). However, unlike Megan, Ameila is very lifelike in face and body, as she is constructed NOT to be a faux babysitter for kids, but as a turbo charged infiltration assassin for the CIA.

How she came into existence is the McGuffin that drives the Main Plot of this film, as we simultaneously find out that (shock surprise) Megan is still “alive”, in an online only sort of way. So when Amelia goes rogue (because of course she does) and comes after Gemma and Cady (for reasons you’ll have to watch to understand) Megan’s primary directive to protect Cady at all costs comes to the surface as she demands Gemma build her a new body to literally kung fu fight Amelia (robato robato).

So with our pieces on the board, let’s get into the nuts ‘n’ bolts of M3gan 2.0.

And for a more detailed description of that, as with our last analysis of the first movie, here’s Chris

Dawes with his half of this review.

Dude – I didn’t see it! You went to the premiere without me!

Chris Dawes

Thanks Chris!

Anyway – some highlights worth mentioning is the existence of another Chekov’s Gun in the form of a cybernetic exo-skeleton that makes people super strong (although its application is at least a little funnier/cooler than you’d think).

We also have a new Megan dance number. For those of you who don’t remember, the main (and some would argue, only) reason the first movie did so well, was because of Megan’s hip-hop/ballet moves she pulls before killing Ronnie Cheng. It was a perfectly bite sized Tik Tok moment which gave the film it’s viral boost as countless people imitated it along the lines of Deadpools *Nsync number. 

However, Megan’s effort this round – whilst certainly cool – is less memorable due to the fact it doesn’t have any unique & easy-to-copy dance move(s). In the first instalment it was a simple twist of the hips and a rubbery swing of the arms mixed with a sideways head-duck. But for 2.0 she does the Robot (very generic and a bit on the nose) with a 360-degree head spin (which is impossible to replicate). Although in its defence, it’s still entertaining to watch… 

Kiwi legend Jermaine Clement guest stars as Alton Appleton, a tech billionaire who serves as both plot device and comedy device.

Another nice (re)addition is the return of Gemma’s two co-workers from the last film Cole (Brian Jordan Alvarez) and Tess (Jen Vann Epps) giving us some nice continuity for 2 characters (and actors) who really don’t need to be there.

And speaking of returning cast – the 2 most important also come back, despite the fact that, had they not, a lot of people wouldn’t have noticed. And they are Amie Donald and Jenna Davis. For they are Megan. More specifically her body and voice respectively.

As Megan was meant to be a pre-teen to match Cady in the first film, the immediate problem they were always facing was, IF they were going to recreate her as before, they would have to recast. But the film-makers clearly appreciate one of the reasons Megan works, is because Donald and Davis clearly work.

And so – with Donald going through the typical growth spurt that comes with puberty – Megan finds herself a foot taller when given her new body, and leaning into this means that the franchise is trying to give the impression each instalment will be a continuation of Megan’s evolution; both in body and in sentience.

And that alone implies this film series will be less Chucky and more Terminator. In more ways than one, as tonally there is a clear shift in Megan’s role from being the Big Bad, to the thing that fights the Big Bad (just like Arnie did in T2)

The Prognosis:

The film-makers have put careful thought into this sequel by analysing the first film’s success, identifying what worked, and leaning into those markers.

So checklist time:

1. Is it a clone of the original? NO

2. Is it a clone of the original but simply more and just bigger? NO

3. Does it expand the universe/lore of the original? YES

4. Is it a good standalone film without relying too heavily on the original? YES

5. (Optional) Does it have a cool new gimmick or element that’s not in the original film, but sits well within the universe of the first film? (Eg: Think Yoda and his ground breaking puppetry in The Empire Strikes Back. Or the CGI T-1000 in T2). NO

6. Does it identify the SPIRIT of the original, and duplicate it? YES definitely.

Because the biggest thing the film-makers have wisely clocked is that Megan ISN’T a horror film, but a fun film. Camp fun. And that’s what makes this movie an upgrade from the original.

Bring on Me-Three-Gan-Three

  • Antony Yee

Dark Water (2005) – Drenched in Atmosphere, Dried of Tension

07 Monday Jul 2025

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

Directed by The Motorcycle Diaries‘ Walter Salles and boasting a stellar cast led by Jennifer Connelly, Dark Water (2005) had all the ingredients for a compelling psychological horror. But despite its prestigious pedigree and the eerie bones of its Japanese source material, the film never quite rises above a slow, soggy trudge through grief, isolation, and leaky ceilings.

Connelly plays Dahlia, a mother in the throes of a bitter divorce who relocates with her daughter to a dilapidated apartment on Roosevelt Island. From the outset, the mood is steeped in melancholy—a constant downpour, peeling wallpaper, and a black stain that won’t stop bleeding through the ceiling. It’s all metaphor, of course, for abandonment, trauma, and emotional erosion. And while Connelly commits fully, offering a deeply felt, restrained performance, even her best efforts struggle to keep the film from sinking under its own dreariness.

There’s strong support from the likes of John C. Reilly, Tim Roth, Dougray Scott, and Pete Postlethwaite, each adding gravitas in small doses. But the ensemble feels wasted on a script that paces like a dirge and spends too long building atmosphere at the expense of real suspense. Where Hideo Nakata’s 2002 original (Honogurai mizu no soko kara) balanced its ghost story with quiet dread and a haunting emotional core, this remake feels bloated by comparison—drawn out and uncertain of where to land its final blow.

Salles, though an accomplished filmmaker, seems misaligned with the genre here. The horror elements never hit hard enough, the tension evaporates rather than builds, and even the film’s climactic revelations arrive without the sting they need. There is a tragic weight at the story’s centre—a meditation on motherhood, abandonment, and sacrifice—but it’s bogged down by the film’s sluggish rhythm and predictability.

The Prognosis:

Dark Water isn’t without merit. It’s beautifully shot and well-acted, and at its heart lies a poignant idea about the things we carry and the past we cannot rinse away. But ultimately, this is a film that, despite all the polish and pedigree, feels like a remake with little new to say—trailing in the shadow of its superior original.

Soaked in mood but lacking menace, Dark Water leaves only a damp impression.

  • Saul Muerte

The Shrouds (2024) – Cronenberg’s Grief-Laced Techno-Tomb

02 Wednesday Jul 2025

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , ,

How dark are you willing to go? For David Cronenberg, The Shrouds marks another step into the abyss—one not of body horror, but of soul-rattling grief. This is arguably his most intimate and meditative work in decades, stitched together from threads of personal mourning, speculative technology, and the philosophical weight of death’s final curtain.

At the centre is Karsh (played with measured intensity by Vincent Cassel), a widower and tech entrepreneur who creates a radical new device: one that allows the living to peer into the graves of their deceased loved ones via digitally monitored “shrouds.” This deeply invasive (yet oddly spiritual) concept is classic Cronenberg—scientific progress colliding with deeply human frailty. But when a series of graves, including that of Karsh’s wife, are mysteriously desecrated, the film pivots into a sombre, noir-like mystery driven more by obsession than resolution.

From the turn of the century, Cronenberg’s work—Spider, A History of Violence, Cosmopolis, and Crimes of the Future—has leaned away from his earlier grotesque sensibilities and toward psychological excavation. The Shrouds is a continuation of that journey, and perhaps his most self-reflective piece since The Fly. With the recent passing of his wife, the film becomes a stark act of cinematic mourning—less a story than a eulogy.

The concept of the shroud here operates on multiple levels: biblically, as the linen of death and resurrection; metaphorically, as the veil between life and death; and narratively, as the enigma that cloaks Karsh’s unraveling. There’s also the ever-present shroud of mystery that clouds the truth—not only of the graveyard desecrations, but of Karsh himself. As the film progresses, Karsh becomes more opaque, his motives murkier, and his grief increasingly pathological. These twists are fascinating but also frustrating, leading the narrative into a fog of unanswered questions that might leave some viewers cold.

Yet Cronenberg surrounds Cassel with a stellar cast that brings warmth and depth. Diane Kruger and Guy Pearce, both enigmatic and grounded, help anchor the film in emotional reality even as it drifts into cerebral territory. Their performances are subtle yet compelling, with Pearce offering a particularly nuanced turn.

The Prognosis:

The Shrouds isn’t easy to love—but then again, grief rarely is. What it offers is a look into one man’s private hell, filtered through the lens of a director who has never shied away from uncomfortable truths. If its philosophical weight sometimes outweighs its dramatic clarity, it remains a compelling, mournful meditation from one of cinema’s most fearless auteurs.

  • Saul Muerte

The Shrouds will be screening in cinemas nationwide from Thu 3rd July.

Outbreak (2024) – A Predictable Descent into Trauma

30 Monday Jun 2025

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Directed by Jeff Wolfe, Outbreak promises psychological dread and emotional turmoil against the backdrop of a creeping viral catastrophe—but ends up delivering little more than a tepid, trauma-soaked shuffle through familiar terrain.

The film follows a State Park Ranger (Billy Burke) and his wife (Alyshia Ochse) as they navigate the emotional wreckage of their teenage son’s disappearance, only to be confronted by a mysterious outbreak that further destabilises their world. As the infection spreads, so too does the sense of despair—but unfortunately, not much tension.

Billy Burke anchors the film with an earnest and committed performance, his weathered presence lending weight to otherwise limp material. Wolfe allows plenty of room for grief to dominate the narrative, but the pacing is sluggish, and the dramatic beats soon feel repetitive. Rather than building momentum, Outbreak spirals into melodrama, with a script that too often leans on genre clichés and a plot that telegraphs its twists from miles away.

There are a few flashes of atmosphere—some moody cinematography and eerie silences—but the film’s tonal heaviness overshadows its horror ambitions. The virus metaphor is serviceable, and by the time the film reaches its climax, the emotional payoff feels muted and overly familiar.

Despite its promising premise and a solid cast including Raoul Max Trujillo, Taylor Handley, and Jessica Frances Dukes, Outbreak plays it safe when it desperately needed to take risks. Watchable, sure—but only for the curious or the committed fans of the cast. For most, this is a slow trudge through thematic terrain that’s already been better navigated by others.

Outbreak will be available to rent or buy on DVD & Digital across Apple TV, Prime Video, Google TV, YouTube, and Fetch (AU) from July 2nd.

  • Saul Muerte

“Consecration: A Beautifully Shot Descent into a Convoluted Mystery”

14 Saturday Jun 2025

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Director Christopher Smith (Triangle, Severance, Creep) has long walked the fine line between genre smarts and psychological thrills. With Consecration, he returns to familiar territory: isolation, trauma, and the gnawing sense that reality is unspooling by divine design—or perhaps something darker. Unfortunately, despite a stellar cast and evocative visuals, this theological thriller never quite delivers the clarity or momentum it promises.

At the centre of the story is Grace, played with icy restraint and wounded conviction by Jena Malone, who travels to a remote convent in the Scottish Highlands after the supposed suicide of her priest brother. It’s no spoiler to say she doesn’t buy the Church’s official line. What follows is a grim unpicking of spiritual rot, ancient rites, and personal demons—literal and otherwise.

Malone is a reliably magnetic presence, giving Grace a cold, coiled intensity. She’s in nearly every frame and carries the film with a quiet sense of fury, even when the script leaves her wandering in narrative fog. Danny Huston, meanwhile, brings a slippery, unsettling charm to his role as Father Romero—a man whose calm demeanour suggests he’s either a holy man or something far more manipulative. Their scenes together crackle with tension, even if the broader story never quite catches fire.

Visually, Consecration is arresting. Robert Adams’ cinematography makes the windswept cliffs and ancient stone interiors of the convent feel appropriately ominous and otherworldly. There’s a chilling stillness to the imagery, as though the land itself has been cursed. Smith knows how to set a mood, and he does so beautifully here, evoking The Ninth Configuration by way of The Nun.

But for all its atmosphere, Consecration stumbles under the weight of its convoluted plot. Flashbacks, hallucinations, religious visions, and a not-so-linear structure make for an increasingly confusing experience. Smith is no stranger to twisty storytelling—Triangle remains a standout in that regard—but here the puzzle-box elements feel murky rather than mind-bending. The story moves slowly, and its pacing often saps the tension that the setting and premise so deftly establish.

By the time the “revelations” arrive, they’re less shocking than they are baffling, tipping the film into a kind of Doctor Who-style timey-wimey terrain that doesn’t mesh with the grounded horror of its opening acts. It’s a tonal mismatch, and one that ultimately dulls the emotional impact of the finale.

Still, there’s something admirable about the ambition on display. Consecration isn’t content to offer up surface-level scares. It aims for spiritual unease and existential horror, and when it clicks, it’s genuinely unsettling. But in the end, the execution can’t match the ambition.

The Prognosis:

A gorgeous, well-acted descent into faith and madness—but one that loses its way somewhere along the sacred path.

  • Saul Muerte

Consecration will be available on UK Digital Platforms from 16th June.

“In Her Skin: The Stylist and the High Cost of Belonging”

13 Friday Jun 2025

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Streaming on Shudder and AMC+ from Monday 16 June

Beneath its softly lit salons and the hushed intimacy of late-night haircuts, The Stylist carves out something far more unsettling: a psychological portrait of aching loneliness, identity collapse, and the monstrous lengths some will go to feel like they belong. Directed with eerie precision by Jill Gevargizian, this feature-length adaptation of her acclaimed short film offers a muted but effective horror tale that leans more into sadness than shocks.

Claire (Najarra Townsend) is a woman adrift—quiet, awkward, desperate to connect—but with a hunger that’s gone grotesquely unmet. She doesn’t just cut hair. She scalps. Each kill is not about violence for its own sake, but a tragic, chilling attempt to wear someone else’s life. And that’s where The Stylist cuts deepest—not in the gore, but in its exploration of identity as a fragile performance, and what happens when someone can no longer locate their own sense of self.

Enter Olivia (Brea Grant), an affable, outgoing bride-to-be who naively invites Claire deeper into her world. From there, the spiral is slow and agonising. What starts as admiration curdles into obsession. Claire’s need to be Olivia isn’t just jealousy—it’s pathological yearning. Her scalping isn’t about trophies in the serial killer sense. It’s about transference. Taking the one thing a person can’t fake: their presence, their social ease, their confidence. Claire doesn’t want to destroy—she wants to inhabit.

Townsend delivers a superb, painfully internal performance. Her Claire is meek but never blank—each nervous twitch and downward glance revealing someone quietly screaming behind her skin. She doesn’t play the killer as a monster, but as a woman in mourning—for connection, for warmth, for identity. It’s a performance that sticks with you. Brea Grant, meanwhile, plays Olivia with a brightness that never tips into caricature, making her slow realisation all the more tragic.

Stylistically, the film is polished, with an elegant aesthetic that contrasts beautifully with its macabre subject matter. There are echoes of Maniac, May, even Single White Female, but The Stylist stands on its own, particularly in how grounded its emotional horror remains. The mood is heavy, sometimes to a fault, with pacing that occasionally feels listless rather than deliberate. Still, the thematic undercurrents—how we mask our emptiness, how we covet others’ confidence like currency—are deeply resonant.

The Prognosis:

There’s a sadness in the scissors. In the need to be seen. In the horror of invisibility. The Stylist doesn’t reinvent the horror genre, but it delivers something more haunting than expected: a quiet eulogy for those who never quite found their place, and the darkness that fills the void.

  • Saul Muerte

From Chains to Clichés: Revisiting Hellraiser: Deader and Hellworld 20 Years Later

08 Sunday Jun 2025

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , ,

The box is still open—but by 2005, the horrors inside had lost their teeth.

As the Hellraiser franchise entered its straight-to-video era in the early 2000s, fans had already weathered a series of diminishing returns. But 2005’s double blow of Hellraiser: Deader and Hellraiser: Hellworld, both directed by Rick Bota and released within months of each other, marked a significant point of no return. Celebrating (or lamenting) their 20th anniversary in 2025, these two entries are less remembered for expanding Clive Barker’s mythos and more for highlighting how far the series had drifted from its grim, sensual origins.

Hellraiser: Deader 

Of the two, Deader fares slightly better—not because it’s a faithful addition to the Hellraiser canon, but because it begins life as something else entirely. Originally a standalone supernatural thriller script, it was retrofitted to include the Cenobites and the Lament Configuration, resulting in a stitched-together film that almost works in spite of itself.

Kari Wuhrer leads the story as a hard-nosed journalist chasing down an underground death cult in Romania. The film flirts with themes of trauma, addiction, and blurred reality—concepts that Hellraiser once handled with provocative boldness—but here, they’re dulled by a by-the-numbers execution. Still, the moody Eastern European backdrop and committed turns from Wuhrer, Marc Warren, and Paul Rhys give it some atmosphere, and the central premise—of a cult obsessed with conquering death—does echo Hellraiser’s fascination with pushing bodily and spiritual limits.

But despite flashes of creativity, Deader never shakes its identity crisis. The Cenobites are barely relevant to the narrative, and Pinhead’s presence feels perfunctory. It’s not a Hellraiser movie so much as a middling thriller that happens to feature a few familiar hooks.

Hellraiser: Hellworld 

If Deader is diluted, then Hellworld is downright disposable. Set in a pseudo-Internet-era gaming world, Hellworld attempts to be meta and modern, pitting a group of teens against a Hellraiser-themed online game. The resulting film feels like Scream meets House on Haunted Hill—but without the tension, intelligence, or atmosphere of either.

Despite the presence of genre legend Lance Henriksen and a young Henry Cavill (long before the cape), the cast is wasted in a script that relies on techno-jargon, faux-twists, and a painfully forced attempt at self-awareness. Doug Bradley’s Pinhead appears for his final time here, but his screen time is minimal, his dialogue rote, and his menace utterly defanged.

The film ends with a ridiculous twist that robs it of even the shallow pleasures of a bad slasher flick. For many fans, Hellworld marks the lowest point in the franchise—and it’s hard to argue with that sentiment.

Doug Bradley: The Final Configuration

If Hellworld is a disappointing swan song, it’s also the end of an era for Doug Bradley, who portrayed Pinhead across eight Hellraiser films from 1987 to 2005. With his commanding presence and Shakespearean delivery, Bradley transformed what could have been a gimmicky monster into a tragic, philosophical figure—a dark priest of pain and pleasure who lingered long after the credits rolled.

Bradley’s contributions to the franchise can’t be overstated. In Hellbound and Hell on Earth, he explored the remnants of humanity in Pinhead’s psyche; in later films like Inferno and Deader, he still managed to bring gravitas even when the writing failed him. His final appearance in Hellworld may be a muted farewell, but his legacy remains stitched into the flesh of the genre.

The Prognosis:

Twenty years on, Deader and Hellworld stand as cautionary tales about franchise fatigue and the dangers of branding over storytelling. What began with Clive Barker’s twisted poetry and existential dread had, by 2005, become little more than window dressing. Still, Deader holds a flicker of creativity, and even in the depths of Hellworld, Bradley’s shadow looms large—a final, ghostly reminder of what Hellraiser once dared to be.

  • Retrospective by Saul Muerte

The Dhampir Rises Again: 40 Years of Vampire Hunter D’s Haunting Influence

28 Wednesday May 2025

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

Premiering Exclusively on Shudder, AMC+ and HIDIVE – Friday 30 May
“In a world ruled by vampires, only a half-blood dares to hunt them.”

When Vampire Hunter D premiered in 1985, few could have predicted the cultural ripple effect it would have across manga, anime, and horror for decades to come. Now, forty years later, this gothic, genre-defying milestone returns with a long-awaited streaming premiere on Shudder, AMC+, and HIDIVE—offering a perfect moment to reflect on its enduring power.

Set in the far-flung future of 12,090 A.D., the film unfolds in a post-apocalyptic landscape where science and sorcery coexist, and humanity lives in fear under the rule of the vampire Nobility. At its centre is Doris Lang, a brave young woman marked for unholy matrimony by the ancient Count Magnus Lee. Her only hope lies in the hands of a mysterious wanderer known only as D—an enigmatic vampire hunter with a tragic secret etched into his very bloodline.

Directed by Toyoo Ashida and based on the novel by Hideyuki Kikuchi with iconic illustrations by Yoshitaka Amano, Vampire Hunter D was a revelation for its time. It merged the aesthetics of Western horror—Dracula, Frankenstein, Lovecraft—with a distinctly Japanese post-apocalyptic flair, opening a door to global audiences that had rarely encountered horror anime in this form. The film’s blend of violence, melancholy, and romanticism felt alien and refreshing—an animated Gothic western that flirted with sci-fi, body horror, and dark fantasy.

The horror in Vampire Hunter D is not just visual—it’s atmospheric. Shadowy castles, mutated creatures, and the decaying elegance of the vampire Nobility all serve to create an air of terminal beauty, where death and corruption linger in every frame. The film pulses with dread, not just from its antagonists, but from the melancholic burden D carries as a dhampir—caught between two worlds, never at home in either.

Manga, and later anime, would absorb and amplify these motifs. Vampire Hunter D helped normalise horror as a serious mode within manga storytelling, inspiring a lineage that includes Berserk, Hellsing, Claymore, and Attack on Titan. Its DNA can be traced through the decades, proving that gothic horror, when stylised with poetic nihilism and speculative world-building, could resonate far beyond Japan.

Though animation has since evolved in leaps and bounds, there’s a charm in Vampire Hunter D’s hand-drawn grit—a visual texture that feels inseparable from its era and identity. It may lack the polish of modern anime, but it makes up for it in atmosphere, tone, and mythic presence.

The Prognosis:

As it celebrates its 40th anniversary with a new generation of fans ready to rediscover it, Vampire Hunter D still holds its scythe high. Part horror, part tragedy, and wholly influential, it remains a cornerstone of horror anime—and proof that even in a world of monsters, the greatest fear often lies within the hero himself.

  • Retrospective Review by Saul Muerte

Vampire Hunter D premieres exclusively on Shudder, AMC+ and HIDIVE – Friday 30 May

From Killer to Filler: Fear Street’s Prom Queen Fails to Reign

24 Saturday May 2025

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

The crown may glitter, but this prom queen is all tulle and no terror.

Fear Street: Prom Queen stumbles into Netflix’s horror lineup with limp energy and even less imagination. Gone is the confident, genre-savvy edge that defined Leigh Janiak’s 2021 trilogy—a trio of interconnected films (1994, 1978, and 1666) that managed to surprise and delight by leaning into horror history while crafting its own mythology. That trilogy was vibrant, bloody, and bold—elevating RL Stine’s teen-friendly chills into something slick and cinematically compelling. With Prom Queen, the fall from Fear Street grace is as loud as it is underwhelming.

Janiak’s absence is keenly felt. What once felt like a love letter to horror has been reduced to a colourless cash-in, trading atmosphere and tension for hollow homage and tired tropes. Director Matt Palmer brings little visual flair or tonal conviction, and the script lacks the spark that made the earlier films feel alive with danger. There’s a fundamental disconnect between the material and its adaptation—as if it’s been lifted from the shelf and passed through a soulless streaming algorithm before making its way to screen.

And that’s a shame, because Prom Queen comes from decent stock. RL Stine’s original novel, while perhaps lighter on the bloodshed, delivered the kind of pulpy suspense and teen melodrama that made his work addictive for a generation. The story’s premise—deadly competition for the school crown—was ripe for a satirical or sinister update in the post-Carrie, post-Mean Girls horror landscape. Instead, the film barely flirts with either, delivering a painfully formulaic slasher that neither frightens nor surprises.

The kills, such as they are, feel half-hearted and predictable. Characters are introduced only to be dispatched minutes later, never afforded personalities beyond archetypes. Suspense is conspicuously absent, replaced by a mechanical rhythm of setup and slash that grows increasingly tiresome. It doesn’t help that the film plays it incredibly safe—never leaning into camp, nor darkness, nor even irony. It simply exists, like a photocopy of a photocopy, drained of the ink that once gave the franchise bite.

India Fowler stands out, her performance as Lori Granger offering flickers of emotion and control that the film doesn’t deserve. She does what she can with thin material and walks away mostly unscathed. The Newton Brothers’ score is another high point—synthy, nostalgic, and oddly elegant—almost a haunting echo of the trilogy’s sharper sound design. But these are isolated gems in an otherwise barren crown.

The Prognosis:

Fear Street: Prom Queen is a disappointing return to a once-promising franchise. It neither honours its roots nor pushes the story in new directions. Instead, it limps across the finish line with little to say and even less to feel. If this is the future of Fear Street, it may be time to turn back.

  • Movie Review by Saul Muerte

Letting Go Hurts: The Surrender Cuts Deep

18 Sunday May 2025

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

Grief, guilt, and resurrection collide in this modest but emotionally raw Shudder original, anchored by Colby Minifie’s compelling performance.

Shudder’s The Surrender, directed by Julia Max, delivers a slow-burn horror that uses its modest means to tell a deeply emotional—and at times unnerving—tale of grief, guilt, and letting go. While the film initially struggles under the weight of its low budget, it gradually finds its footing as it surrenders itself to the emotional and psychological turmoil at its centre.

At the heart of the story is the fraught relationship between a grieving mother and her daughter Megan (Colby Minifie), as they wrestle with the sudden death of their husband and father. Desperate and broken, the mother enlists a mysterious stranger to bring her husband back from the dead. What begins as a misguided act of love quickly spirals into something much more brutal and unnatural.

The supernatural elements are understated at first, and admittedly, the film’s visual limitations are most noticeable in its early scenes. But what The Surrender lacks in spectacle, it more than makes up for in its performances—particularly Minifie’s. As Megan, she delivers a performance grounded in realism and vulnerability, guiding the audience through the stages of grief with raw authenticity. Her arc—resisting, confronting, and eventually accepting the horror unraveling around her—anchors the film and gives its title real weight.

Director Julia Max plays with mood and silence rather than jump scares, and the atmosphere becomes more effective the longer we sit in it. The film’s title becomes a double-edged term: surrender to grief, surrender to love, and ultimately, surrender to what can’t be undone.

The Prognosis:

While it never fully transcends its genre or budget, The Surrender is a thoughtful entry in the grief-horror subgenre that lingers in the mind more than expected. For those patient enough to give in, there’s something genuinely resonant beneath the blood and shadow.

  • Movie Review by Saul Muerte

The Surrender is streaming on Shudder from Fri 23rd May.