Sixty Screams of the ’60s: The Ultimate Horror Countdown Part 4

26 Saturday Jul 2025

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

,

Part 4: #30–21 – Madness, Demons, and Psychological Dread

#30. Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed (1969, dir. Terence Fisher) ★★★½

Arguably Hammer’s darkest Frankenstein entry, this time Peter Cushing’s Baron is more villain than anti-hero, orchestrating blackmail, body-snatching, and worse. Fisher brings a chilly intensity, and the film’s cold-blooded tone marks a grim evolution in the studio’s legacy. It’s intelligent, brutal, and emotionally bleak.

#29. Horrors of Malformed Men (1969, dir. Teruo Ishii) ★★★½

A nightmarish swirl of Edogawa Rampo adaptations and Ishii’s unique perversity, this Japanese cult classic was banned for decades. Full of surreal grotesquerie, body horror, and identity confusion, it’s a fever dream drenched in taboo. Not for the faint-hearted, but a fascinating genre provocation.

#28. Dracula: Prince of Darkness (1966, dir. Terence Fisher) ★★★½

Christopher Lee returns (wordless, no less) in this elegant continuation of Hammer’s Dracula mythos. While the pacing is deliberate, the imagery is stunning, and Lee’s physical performance makes Dracula all the more monstrous. An important sequel that cemented the Count’s terrifying legacy.

#27. The Devil Rides Out (1968, dir. Terence Fisher) ★★★½

Hammer’s finest foray into Satanic horror, led by a commanding Christopher Lee performance as the heroic Duc de Richleau. Black masses, possession, and a tense battle of good vs. evil play out in bold, colourful fashion. Elevated by Richard Matheson’s script and Lee’s conviction.

#26. Viy (1967, dir. Konstantin Ershov & Georgi Kropachyov) ★★★½

The first Soviet-era horror film, Viy is a folk tale brought to glorious life. A seminary student must spend three nights in a chapel with a witch’s corpse, leading to unforgettable supernatural chaos. Innovative effects and bizarre imagery make this a true one-of-a-kind.

#25. Goke, Body Snatcher From Hell (1968, dir. Hajime Satô) ★★★½

Aliens, gore, and political subtext crash-land in this wild Japanese sci-fi horror hybrid. A hijacked plane, a crashed UFO, and gooey body possession form the backbone of a sharp, cynical allegory about humanity’s self-destruction. Vivid, vicious, and wonderfully unhinged.

#24. Tales of Terror (1962, dir. Roger Corman) ★★★★

Three Poe tales, three Price performances. From the lugubrious “Morella” to the boozy brilliance of “The Black Cat,” this anthology shows Corman and Price at their most playful. Peter Lorre steals the middle segment, but the whole film is stylish, macabre fun.

#23. The Pit and the Pendulum (1961, dir. Roger Corman) ★★★★

One of Corman’s finest. Vincent Price gives a tormented turn as a man unraveling in a Spanish castle haunted by murder and legacy. Lavish set design, expressionistic visuals, and a killer twist ending mark this as a highlight of the AIP-Poe cycle.

#22. Strait-Jacket (1964, dir. William Castle) ★★★★

Joan Crawford wields an axe in this deliciously over-the-top slasher prototype. Playing with themes of madness, motherhood, and misdirection, Castle delivers more than gimmicks here. Crawford’s performance is both unhinged and heartbreaking—a camp classic with surprising depth.

#21. Eye of the Devil (1966, dir. J. Lee Thompson) ★★★★

A deeply strange and haunting occult thriller with an aristocratic chill. Starring Deborah Kerr, David Niven, and a hypnotic Sharon Tate, the film channels folk horror vibes before it was fashionable. Mysterious rituals and fatalism make this a forgotten gem worth resurrecting.

Part 5: #20–11 – The Heavy Hitters of Horror’s New Age coming soon.

  • Saul Muerte

Sixty Screams of the 60s: The Ultimate Horror Countdown Part 3

26 Saturday Jul 2025

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Stylised Madness and Monstrous Worlds

As we claw our way through the middle of the countdown, the films take on bolder styles and more abstract fears. Japanese erotica, Italian gialli, sci-fi nightmares, and gothic grandeur all make their presence known here, proving that the 1960s were just as experimental as they were eerie.

#40. Blind Beast (1969, dir. Yasuzo Masumura) ★★★½

A dark and disturbing study of obsession, art, and sensory overload. A blind sculptor kidnaps a model to create the ultimate work of tactile art in a room covered in human body parts. Erotic, surreal, and deeply unsettling—Masumura’s vision is uncompromising.

#39. Brides of Dracula (1960, dir. Terence Fisher) ★★★½

Despite the absence of Dracula himself, this Hammer gem remains a standout. Peter Cushing returns as Van Helsing, battling a suave, aristocratic vampire in a film loaded with atmosphere, stylised lighting, and gothic bravado. A masterclass in mood.

#38. The Curse of the Werewolf (1961, dir. Terence Fisher) ★★★½

Hammer’s only werewolf outing features a tragic Oliver Reed in a role bursting with animalistic energy. Beautiful production design and a uniquely Spanish setting give it flavour, even if the pacing isn’t as tight as Hammer’s best.

#37. Planet of the Vampires (1965, dir. Mario Bava) ★★★½

Sci-fi and horror converge in this visually stunning Italian thriller. Before Alien, Bava gave us cosmic terror, fog-drenched atmospheres, and mind-controlled astronauts. A template for space-bound horror, dripping in mood and style.

#36. The Flesh and the Fiends (1960, dir. John Gilling) ★★★½

Based on the real-life Burke and Hare murders, this British film stars Peter Cushing as Dr. Knox. With a gritty realism and moral ambiguity, it’s an early stab at true crime horror. More grounded than gory, but disturbing all the same.

#35. At Midnight I’ll Take Your Soul (1963, dir. José Mojica Marins) ★★★½

The debut of Coffin Joe, Brazil’s top-hatted, nihilistic horror icon. A mix of pulp philosophy, sadism, and folk terror, it shocked audiences and forged a new path for South American horror. A gritty, nasty little slice of cult legend.

#34. Dr. Terror’s House of Horrors (1965, dir. Freddie Francis) ★★★½

The granddaddy of British horror anthologies. Peter Cushing’s tarot reader dooms five strangers aboard a train in classic portmanteau fashion. It set the blueprint for Amicus’s horror output to come. Charming, spooky, and full of cobwebbed delights.

#33. Onibaba (1964, dir. Kaneto Shindō) ★★★½

A hypnotic mix of war, eroticism, and ghostly fear set in feudal Japan. Two women lure and kill soldiers in a ravaged swamp—until one dons a demon mask with tragic consequences. Stark, sensual, and utterly haunting.

#32. The Diabolical Dr. Z (1966, dir. Jess Franco) ★★★½

A strange, stylish revenge tale blending sci-fi, hypnosis, and pulp tropes. A female scientist uses a mind-controlled dancer to avenge her father’s death. With its cabaret horror tone, it’s one of Franco’s more coherent and visually rich outings.

#31. Black Sabbath (1963, dir. Mario Bava) ★★★½

Bava delivers three gothic tales of terror, with Boris Karloff hosting and starring. From cursed rings to vengeful spirits and vampiric folklore, this Italian anthology mixes moody lighting, eerie pacing, and operatic horror. Essential viewing.

Part 4: #30–21 – Madness, Demons, and Psychological Dread coming soon!

Sixty Screams of the ’60s: The Ultimate Horror Countdown Part 2

26 Saturday Jul 2025

Posted by in retrospective, Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

,

Haunted Villages, Ghost Cats, and Supernatural Schemes

With entries #50 to #41, we move deeper into international territory and find horror leaning into psychological dread, tragic spirits, and doomed villages. From Korea to Italy and Japan to the American heartland, the genre flexes new muscles as it breaks further from its gothic roots.

#50. Diary of a Madman (1963, dir. Reginald Le Borg) ★★★

Vincent Price headlines this adaptation of a lesser-known Guy de Maupassant tale. Possessed by a malevolent invisible entity, Price delivers delicious monologues while descending into madness. Though it never reaches the heights of his Poe roles, it’s an eerie morality tale worth rediscovering.

#49. The Ghost Cat of Otama Pond (1960, dir. Yoshihiro Ishikawa) ★★★

A fine example of Japan’s kaibyō eiga (ghost cat) subgenre, this film blends folktale with supernatural horror as a feline spirit exacts vengeance from beyond the grave. Eerie, painterly visuals and a chilling atmosphere elevate a haunting revenge story.

#48. Kiss of the Vampire (1963, dir. Don Sharp) ★★★

Hammer tried something a little different with this Dracula-adjacent tale, absent of Cushing and Lee but enriched with occult elements, eerie visuals, and a batty finale. Australian director Don Sharp lends a confident hand, offering a vampiric tale both eerie and off-kilter.

#47. The Phantom of the Opera (1962, dir. Terence Fisher) ★★★

Hammer’s take on Leroux’s classic replaces horror with pathos, casting Herbert Lom as a sympathetic Phantom. Visually impressive with strong performances, but it lacks the menace of its Universal predecessor. Still, a noteworthy variation on a familiar tragedy.

#46. The Horrible Dr. Hichcock (1962, dir. Riccardo Freda) ★★★

A controversial and stylish piece of Italian gothic horror featuring necrophilia, fog-drenched corridors, and morbid obsession. Barbara Steele is riveting as always, while Freda crafts an atmosphere of inescapable decay. More perverse than terrifying, but unforgettable.

#45. The Housemaid (1960, dir. Kim Ki-young) ★★★

A proto-psychological thriller from South Korea that slides from domestic drama into full-blown horror. A manipulative housemaid destabilizes a middle-class household in a tale of infidelity, class, and control. Tense, tragic, and way ahead of its time.

#44. Spirits of the Dead (1968, dirs. Vadim, Malle, Fellini) ★★★½

A lavish Poe anthology boasting segments from three European auteurs. Jane Fonda stuns in Vadim’s “Metzengerstein,” Malle brings eerie tension in “William Wilson,” but it’s Fellini’s phantasmagoric “Toby Dammit” that steals the show. A decadent, surreal trip.

#43. Mill of the Stone Women (1960, dir. Giorgio Ferroni) ★★★½

Italy’s answer to Hammer’s gothic boom. A mysterious sculptor uses a creepy windmill and his statuesque creations to cover a darker secret. Gorgeously shot and dripping with atmosphere, it’s a Euro-horror delight that deserves more love.

#42. Night of the Eagle (1962, dir. Sidney Hayers) ★★★½

Also known as Burn, Witch, Burn!, this British occult thriller follows a rational professor who discovers his wife is secretly using magic to protect him. Smartly written with creeping suspense and a strong anti-rationalist message. Low on gore, high on tension.

#41. The City of the Dead (1960, dir. John Llewellyn Moxey) ★★★½

An atmospheric gem often overshadowed by bigger titles. Christopher Lee lures a student into a New England town still ruled by witches. Fog, cobblestone, and stark monochrome make for a chilling morality tale steeped in black magic.

Sixty Screams of the ’60s: The Ultimate Horror Countdown

26 Saturday Jul 2025

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Part 1: #60–51 – The Cult, the Camp, and the Curious

We begin our descent into the blood-soaked heart of 1960s horror with the first ten entries in our countdown. These films may sit at the lower end of the list, but they offer vital glimpses into a decade where the genre was in transition, colliding with pulp, camp, and gothic revivalism. From transatlantic Poe adaptations to Euro oddities and genre hybrids, there’s plenty of strange flavour to taste.

#60. The Comedy of Terrors (1963, dir. Jacques Tourneur) ★★★

An all-star cast including Vincent Price, Peter Lorre, and Boris Karloff hams it up in this macabre farce about a failing undertaker who resorts to murder to boost business. While the comedy is a mixed bag, there’s a ghoulish charm and high production value that keeps it watchable. A fitting farewell for Tourneur’s horror career, though more chuckle than chill.

#59. Captain Clegg (1962, dir. Peter Graham Scott) ★★★

Hammer Horror goes high-seas with this smugglers-and-skeletons yarn starring Peter Cushing. It’s not pure horror in the traditional sense, but its ghostly marsh phantoms and gothic aesthetics earn it a place here. A rousing period piece with a horror-adjacent vibe.

#58. The Mask (1961, dir. Julian Roffman) ★★★

Canada’s first 3D horror film makes its mark with surreal sequences that still hold a hypnotic power. A psychiatrist receives a mysterious mask that unleashes violent hallucinations. Outside the trippy dreamscapes, it drags, but the psychedelic ambition can’t be denied.

#57. The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll (1960, dir. Terence Fisher) ★★★

Hammer flips the Hyde trope with a dashing, seductive monster and a tortured, bearded Jekyll. It’s a visually lush and bold take, though some melodramatic moments feel dated. Paul Massie’s dual performance divides audiences, but Christopher Lee provides solid menace in support.

#56. The Premature Burial (1962, dir. Roger Corman) ★★★

Ray Milland fills in for Price in this Poe adaptation about a man obsessed with being buried alive. Corman brings gothic flair, but this entry lacks the spark of the other AIP-Poe films. Still, Milland sells the existential dread with grim conviction.

#55. The Ghost (1963, dir. Riccardo Freda) ★★★

Barbara Steele commands the screen in this moody Italian chiller. A spiritual sequel to “The Horrible Dr. Hichcock,” it brings a fog-laced atmosphere, betrayal, and revenant revenge. Not as sharp as Bava or Margheriti, but full of grim style.

#54. The Tell-Tale Heart (1960, dir. Ernest Morris) ★★★

This British adaptation strips Poe’s tale down to its paranoid bones. Laurence Payne plays the guilt-ridden lodger unraveling under pressure. Shot with restraint and earnest intent, it lacks punch but offers a solid psychological slow burn.

#53. The Awful Dr. Orloff (1962, dir. Jess Franco) ★★★

Jess Franco makes his mark with this eerie, low-budget homage to “Eyes Without a Face.” Mad science, silent killers, and nightclub sleaze merge into a dreamlike noir-horror hybrid. The first of many Orloffs, this one remains unsettlingly poetic.

#52. The Cabinet of Caligari (1962, dir. Roger Kay) ★★★

A loose reinterpretation of the silent classic, this psychological thriller leans into twisty mind games and Freudian horror. Though not as expressionistic as its namesake, it taps into themes of control and identity with an eerie undercurrent.

#51. House of Usher (1960, dir. Roger Corman) ★★★

The first and arguably most iconic of Corman’s Poe cycle, with Vincent Price haunting the screen as Roderick Usher. Lavish sets, vivid colours, and doom-laden dialogue make for a melodramatic treat. A blueprint for American Gothic horror of the decade.

Stay tuned for Part 2 (#50–41) as we dive deeper into the dread-soaked shadows of the 1960s—from haunted villages to feline phantoms and the rise of psychological fear in international cinema.

“The Templars Take to the Sea: Ossorio’s Last Ride with the Blind Dead”

25 Friday Jul 2025

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

,

“Their Pagan God has Given his Command: 7 Nights, 7 Victims, 7 Human Hearts!”

With Night of the Seagulls, Amando de Ossorio closes the chapter on his eerie Tomb of the Blind Dead series—four films that occupy a strange, fog-drenched intersection between folk horror, Gothic surrealism, and undead mythology. While not the strongest entry in the franchise, this final installment remains a worthwhile watch for fans of Ossorio’s unique atmospheric touch and the continuing saga of his most iconic creations: the Blind Dead.

The plot once again centres around the cursed Templar Knights—now firmly transformed into deathless, eyeless revenants who rise nightly to fulfill blood rituals in the service of a mysterious sea-bound deity. This time, the setting shifts to a remote seaside village, where a young doctor and his wife arrive only to be swept into a grim local tradition: seven nights of ritual human sacrifice to appease the Templars and their dark god.

Stylistically, Ossorio leans fully into mood and menace. The windswept cliffs, mournful seagulls, and dilapidated coastal dwellings ooze decay. The Blind Dead themselves, with their skeletal forms and snail-paced advance, remain chilling in concept if not always in execution. They don’t just stalk—they haunt. And yet, despite the atmosphere, the film suffers from a slow pace and underdeveloped characters. The townspeople are largely silent archetypes, and the protagonists feel more like bystanders than participants in the horror.

Compared to the raw occultism of Tombs of the Blind Dead (1972) or the surreal train setting of Horror of the Zombies (1974), Night of the Seagulls is more subdued. The violence is ritualistic, not frantic; the horror more mythic than visceral. Ossorio seems less interested in terror and more in cementing the lore behind the Templars—giving them a vaguely Lovecraftian spin with the sea god and sacrificial rites.

As a finale, it doesn’t go out with a bang—but it doesn’t betray the spirit of the series either. Ossorio’s vision remains intact: sombre, strange, and stubbornly slow-burning. For devotees of Euro-horror and Spanish cult cinema, Night of the Seagulls is a worthy, if flawed, farewell to one of horror’s most original undead legacies.

The Prognosis: 

A moody, atmospheric end to the Blind Dead saga, best appreciated by those already invested in Ossorio’s unique brand of occult horror.

  • Saul Muerte

“Creepy Crawlies and Small-Town Suspicion: They Nest Delivers Buggy B-Movie Thrills”

24 Thursday Jul 2025

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , ,

If you’re even slightly squeamish about insects, They Nest might push you into full-blown entomophobia. This made-for-TV creature feature from director Ellory Elkayem (Eight Legged Freaks) creeps along with familiar B-movie beats but manages to burrow under your skin with some genuinely unsettling bug-based horror. Think Arachnophobia meets The Thing, but with cockroaches—and far less prestige.

Thomas Calabro plays Dr. Cahill, a stressed-out surgeon escaping city burnout by retreating to a quaint island in Maine, only to be greeted by hostility from the locals and the rising threat of flesh-eating, mind-controlling cockroaches. The infestation is discovered via a waterlogged corpse, and as you’d expect, nobody believes Cahill until it’s far too late. Add Dean Stockwell to the mix as a cranky islander, and you’ve got a reliable genre face to anchor the mayhem when it hits.

Despite some low-rent production values and a fairly predictable plot, They Nest offers a few effective chills, especially when the critters start crawling into the more intimate spaces of the human body. The practical effects are modest but used cleverly, and Elkayem leans into the paranoia of small-town denial with just enough flair to keep it from feeling entirely by-the-numbers.

The Prognosis:

Where the film stumbles is in its uneven tone and forgettable characters, who mostly serve as bug fodder. But for fans of creature features who enjoy a slow buildup and a grotesque payoff, They Nest has enough squirmy moments to satisfy. It never reaches cult classic status, but it’s an enjoyable slice of early 2000s horror that earns its place in the insect invasion subgenre—just don’t watch it during dinner.

  • Saul Muerte

“Tiny Terrors, Big Laughs: Attack of the Beast Creatures Is So Bad, It Bites”

24 Thursday Jul 2025

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Some films make you question how they ever got made. Attack of the Beast Creatures is one of those films — a gloriously inept, low-budget oddity that barely scrapes together a plot but delivers just enough unintentional hilarity to justify its cult following. Lost for years in VHS obscurity, it’s the kind of movie you stumble across late at night and convince yourself was a fever dream.

After a shipwreck leaves a group of survivors stranded on a remote island, they soon discover the land is crawling with tiny, screeching, flesh-eating puppet creatures. That’s pretty much the entire plot. These rubbery monsters — who look like dollar-store tiki dolls with bad attitudes — hurl themselves at their victims in slow-motion attacks that manage to be both hysterical and strangely charming. It’s amateur hour on all fronts: shaky camera work, soap opera-level acting, and a score that sounds like someone noodling on a Casio keyboard during a power outage.

And yet, for all its incompetence, Attack of the Beast Creatures has an earnestness that’s hard to hate. There’s no irony or winking at the camera — the filmmakers genuinely thought they were making a terrifying survival horror movie. That misplaced sincerity is part of what makes it so watchable, especially for fans of bad movie nights and VHS-era junk treasures.

The Prognosis:

It’s a slog in places, with padded scenes and cardboard characters, but the sheer absurdity of being hunted by screeching, knee-high monsters keeps things oddly entertaining. It’s terrible — make no mistake — but it’s also a prime example of ’80s regional horror going for broke with no money and too much imagination. You may not survive the terror, but you’ll definitely survive with a smirk.

  • Saul Muerte

“Scars and Scales: Monster Island Delivers Heart with its Horror”

21 Monday Jul 2025

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , ,

Directed by: Mike Wiluan | Starring Dean Fujioka, Callum Woodhouse | Premieres on Shudder & AMC+ July 25

In Monster Island, Shudder’s latest exclusive creature feature, wartime survival collides with Southeast Asian myth in a film that smartly blends old-school monster thrills with an unexpected emotional core. Inspired by Creature from the Black Lagoon and rooted in Malay folklore, the story drops a Japanese soldier and a British POW onto a seemingly deserted island following a submarine attack. But peace is short-lived, as the island is home to the Orang Ikan — a fearsome aquatic predator who’s as territorial as it is terrifying.

What sets Monster Island apart from many of its creature feature contemporaries is its willingness to slow down and explore the human side of horror. Rather than lean solely on blood and beasts, the film builds tension from cultural divides and post-traumatic wounds, forcing its two leads into a fragile alliance. Dean Fujioka and Callum Woodhouse bring depth and vulnerability to roles that could have been flat archetypes. Their chemistry makes the film’s central theme — that survival often means facing not just monsters, but your own past — all the more resonant.

Admittedly, the film’s ambition sometimes outpaces its resources. Pyrotechnic effects and digital enhancements can look rough around the edges, and the pacing dips during some mid-island soul-searching. But the film’s practical effects — particularly the creature design — are strong, evoking a rubber-suited charm without feeling dated. There’s enough gore to keep horror hounds engaged, but it never overpowers the human drama, and that balance is key to its charm.

The Prognosis:

While it might not revolutionise the genre, Monster Island shows there’s still plenty of room for creature features with a conscience. By grounding its mythological terror in real-world history and emotional stakes, the film claws its way out of B-movie cliché and into something far more sincere. For fans of wartime horror, international folklore, or just old-school monster mayhem with a pulse, this island trip is worth the ferry.

  • Saul Muerte

Alice Maio Mackay Sheds The Serpent’s Skin at Fantasia 2025

21 Monday Jul 2025

Posted by in Australian Horror

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

Trans horror’s fiercest voice returns with her most personal and spellbinding film yet

Australian filmmaker Alice Maio Mackay returns to the Fantasia International Film Festival with the Canadian premiere of her latest genre-defying feature, The Serpent’s Skin, screening July 23 and 25. Already hailed as her most emotionally resonant and stylistically bold film to date, The Serpent’s Skin fuses supernatural romance with visceral horror, balancing the grotesque and the intimate in true Mackay fashion.

With nods to The Craft, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and Charmed, Mackay’s newest film conjures millennial teen nostalgia while grounding its witchy terror in the urgent realities of Gen-Z identity, trans survival, and queer resilience. The Serpent’s Skin follows Anna, a trans girl who escapes her stifling, bigoted hometown only to find both romance and horror in a new city—where she falls for goth tattoo artist Gen and accidentally unleashes a demon that begins feeding on their chosen family. What follows is a chilling exploration of trust, self-doubt, and love under supernatural pressure.

Mackay’s voice is unmistakable—raw, punk, defiantly queer—and in The Serpent’s Skin, she harnesses everything she’s learned across her rising career.

From her debut So Vam (2021), Mackay immediately caught the attention of the indie horror world. Described as “a perfect metaphor for transitions and change” and “crafted with a learned voice,” the film positioned Mackay as a filmmaker to watch. Her follow-up, Bad Girl Boogey (2023), was no less impactful—“gritty and raw,” it revealed a sharpened focus and a stronger command of message-driven horror, showing that Mackay could “resonate” beyond just subculture circles.

With T-Blockers (2024), she made perhaps her most personal statement yet. Reviewers called it “fresh,” “unifying,” and “awakening,” applauding how Mackay used her own lived experience to channel communal anger and hope, all while clearly “having a ball” pushing genre boundaries. Her rapid creative output continued with Satranic Panic, another bold and timely entry praised for placing “real characters dealing with real issues in surreal circumstances.”

Produced by Dark Star Pictures, the company that has stood behind each of Mackay’s last five films, The Serpent’s Skin stars Alexandra McVicker (Vice Principals), Scott Major (Heartbreak High), Charlotte Chimes (Neighbours), and Jordan Dulieu (Before Dawn). It also features Fantasia alumni cameos from Avalon Fast (Honeycomb), Joe Lynch (Suitable Flesh), and Betsey Brown (Assholes), with Emmy-nominated Vera Drew (The People’s Joker) returning as editor and Louise Weard (Castration Movie) joining as producer.

Premiering earlier this year at Frameline and heading next to FrightFest this August, The Serpent’s Skin is more than just a new chapter in Mackay’s filmography—it’s a culmination of her growth as a director, writer, and creative force. She’s built a canon that pulses with identity, rage, humour, and style, always speaking directly to those who need it most.

As she returns to Fantasia—a festival that helped champion her earliest work—it’s clear Alice Maio Mackay is no longer just a promising talent. She’s a defining voice in trans cinema and genre storytelling. And with The Serpent’s Skin, she reminds us that transformation, no matter how painful, can be power.

  • Saul Muerte

The Devil’s Rejects: Dust, Blood, and Diminishing Returns

20 Sunday Jul 2025

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , ,

Rob Zombie trades haunted house horror for outlaw grime — but is it worth the ride?

Rob Zombie is, and always has been, a divisive filmmaker. For some, he’s a torchbearer of grimy grindhouse horror—a provocateur unafraid to rub blood and sleaze directly into the viewer’s face. For others, he’s a glorified fanboy with a fetish for exploitation cinema, offering violence without insight and style without restraint. This polarising vision is both The Devil’s Rejects’ biggest asset and its greatest liability.

A sequel to House of 1000 Corpses, this follow-up trades in the surreal, comic-book splatter of its predecessor for a meaner, dust-choked revenge western soaked in nihilism. It’s Rob Zombie unfiltered—gleefully anarchic and unrepentantly ugly. And while the ambition to shift tone and expand the universe deserves credit, the end result still feels like a self-indulgent mixtape of Texas terror clichés, Southern rock needle drops, and white-trash sadism.

There’s no denying Zombie has an eye for raw texture, and performances from Sid Haig, Bill Moseley, and Sheri Moon Zombie are all-in on the grotesque charisma of the Firefly clan. The inclusion of William Forsythe as the vengeful Sheriff Wydell adds a sense of fatalistic grit to the narrative. But underneath the sweaty aesthetic and outlaw theatrics, there’s little emotional depth or meaningful commentary to sustain the film’s relentless cruelty. Moments of potential introspection—particularly around the blurred lines between good and evil—are drowned in nihilism, and by the time Free Bird plays over the climactic slow-motion gunfight, it feels more like an empty pose than a cathartic send-off.

Sequel Scorecard: Does The Devil’s Rejects Work as a Sequel?

  1. Is it a clone of the original?
    No. This is one of the film’s few clear strengths. The Devil’s Rejects ditches the carnival-horror weirdness of House of 1000 Corpses for a stripped-down, road-movie vibe that’s closer to The Texas Chain Saw Massacre 2 meets Bonnie and Clyde.
  2. Is it a clone of the original but simply more and just bigger?
    No. In fact, it goes smaller and leaner in structure, avoiding elaborate set pieces for a more grounded aesthetic.
  3. Does it expand the universe/lore of the original?
    Yes, but selectively. We get a deeper look at the Firefly family’s dynamic and how they function outside their lair—but the mythology is thin, and the expansion often feels like just an excuse to keep the violence rolling.
  4. Is it a good standalone film without relying too heavily on the original?
    Mostly. While prior knowledge enhances the experience, it’s not strictly necessary. The film functions as a sadistic chase thriller even if you’ve never seen House of 1000 Corpses.
  5. Does it have a cool new gimmick or element that’s not in the original film, but sits well within the universe of the first film?
    Yes. The tonal shift from psychedelic splatter to dusty outlaw epic is bold, even if not entirely successful.
  6. Does it identify the SPIRIT of the original, and duplicate it?
    Partially. Zombie retains his love for depravity, exploitation and transgressive figures—but loses the lurid fun and surreal horror that made the original at least feel unpredictable.

The Prognosis:

The Devil’s Rejects is an uncompromising sequel that deserves recognition for its tonal shift and character focus. But its descent into brutality-for-brutality’s-sake leaves little room for nuance, and its adoration for nihilism can grow tiresome. Rob Zombie knows exactly what kind of film he wants to make—and fans of his aesthetic will defend this to the bitter end—but for others, it may feel like style over substance… with a soundtrack.

  • Saul Muerte