Tag Archives: horror

Movie Review: In A Violent Nature (2024)

02 Friday Aug 2024

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

There has been a lot of buzz circulating around the Canadian slasher film In A Violent Nature, written and directed by Chris Nash. The film’s simple yet intriguing concept of following the narrative from the killer’s point of view has drawn comparisons to horror classics like Friday the 13th and The Texas Chain Saw Massacre. However, while this unique perspective offers some fresh insights, it also reveals the film’s significant flaws.

The plot of In A Violent Nature centers on a silent, cold-blooded assassin who stalks his victims through the dense Ontario woodlands. Nash’s decision to frame the story from the killer’s viewpoint is both a stroke of genius and an Achilles heel. On one hand, it effectively highlights the calculative and methodical nature of the killer, providing a chilling glimpse into his mind. The killer finds unique and gruesome ways to dispatch his unsuspecting victims, adding a layer of intrigue to the narrative.

However, this one-note delivery can become tedious as the audience is forced to trawl along with the killer through the seemingly monotonous and meandering forest. The slow pace and lack of variation risk boring the viewers, pulling them out of the immersive world that Nash strives to create. The supporting cast’s poor acting exacerbates this issue, as their performances often feel forced and unrealistic.

While some might argue that over-the-top acting is a staple of slasher films, there is a fine line between deliberate campiness and simply bad acting. Unfortunately, In A Violent Nature falls into the latter category, with dialogue that feels stilted and characters that fail to come across as genuine or engaging. This stark contrast to Nash’s intended style and substance is jarring and detracts from the overall experience.

Despite its shortcomings, the film’s conclusion delivers a powerful key message. By the end, the killer’s actions reveal a bleak commentary on the nature of violence and the desensitization of society. This ending attempts to leave the audience with a thought-provoking reflection on the cyclical and inescapable nature of brutality, aligning with the grim tone set by its horror predecessors.

The Prognosis:

In A Violent Nature is a mixed bag. While its concept of following the killer’s perspective is innovative and offers some intriguing moments, the execution falls flat due to pacing issues and subpar acting. The film’s influences from horror classics like Friday the 13th and The Texas Chain Saw Massacre are evident, but it struggles to live up to the standards set by these genre-defining movies. For die-hard slasher fans, it might be worth a watch, but for others, it may not leave a lasting impression.

  • Saul Muerte

Movie review: Longlegs (2024)

20 Saturday Jul 2024

Posted by in Movie review

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

, , , , , , ,

There are some directors in the horror genre who make their mark with bold, fantastical statements. While their voices are initially impactful, by the third or fourth outing, their energy may begin to wane. However, Osgood Perkins, the director and writer of Longlegs, is playing the long game. Known for his meticulously slow pacing, strong leanings into paranormal and occult storytelling, and rich visual imagery, Perkins has been crafting a unique style that promises a lengthy and delightfully intriguing career.

His first two features, The Blackcoat’s Daughter and I Am The Pretty Thing That Lives in the House, were meticulously detailed, focusing on themes of isolation and desperation. His third feature, Gretel & Hansel, offered an offbeat twist on the classic fairytale with a focus on the feminine side of the story. While it may have strayed slightly from his usual tone, it still showcased incredible pacing and cinematography.

Longlegs may be his finest hour yet. It blends notable elements from thriller classics like Silence of the Lambs and David Fincher’s films, combined with the Lynchian vibe that permeates Perkins’ work. From its opening scenes, Longlegs sets a gripping pace and tone with a shocking opener and remarkable sound design that hooks you and never lets go.

Maika Monroe (It Follows) delivers a powerful performance as Lee Harker, an FBI agent with an uncanny knack for instinctively tuning into her environment. This trait quickly gets her noticed and involved in a curious investigation of a serial killer who leaves cryptic notes at his crime scenes. Harker’s birdlike mannerisms and quirky social awkwardness unfold as the inquiry unearths more than she anticipated, despite her possible psychic intuition.

And then there’s Nicolas Cage’s wondrous transformation as the titular Longlegs. The cinematography teases us with glimpses of his face, luring us deeper into the mythology that surrounds him.

The Prognosis:

Visually stunning and meticulously crafted, Perkins delivers yet another slow-burn feature that ensnares you. While the middle act may wane slightly, threatening to loosen its grip on the viewer, the final act pulls the trigger and leaves you reeling. Perkins’ style may not be for everyone, but Longlegs is the closest he has come to his best directorial stance. The journey he takes us on is always gripping, and the performances are phenomenally bright. May he continue to shine with the steady hand he has demonstrated so far.

  • Saul Muerte

Longlegs is currently screening at cinemas nationwide.

Movie review: Birdeater (2024)

19 Friday Jul 2024

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

To liken this movie to Talk To Me, as I’ve noticed in certain publications, is like comparing apples with oranges. Talk To Me deserves the praise it received for the manner in which it delved into the pursuit of lost youth, grief and desperation with a particular bent that tapped into the popular zeitgeist. Birdeater is a far different entity and the comparisons purely rest on the creators all being from Australia. Now I’m going to champion the dark heart of the Australian horror genre but let’s not paint them with the same brush when accolades and praise should be placed where it deserves. Now does Birdeater deserve its own positive praise from the festival circuits, such as SXSW Austin, Melbourne International Film Festival and CinefestOz, plus receiving the Audience Award for Best Australian Narrative Feature at Sydney Film Festival? Happily, yes.

Directed by the duo of Jim Weir and Jack Clark, it attempts to place the toxic masculinity that resides beneath the surface of Australian society firmly under scrutiny as they slowly turn the screw with unsettling and shocking results.

I’ve lived in this land of this savage-yet-loveable land for over 20 years now and while the so-called motherland from which I originally hailed has its own fair share of troubles and tribulations, it struck me how the Australian nation had a deeply embedded masculine identity at its core and this is the vein that the filmmakers have tapped into, exposing the fevered flow that pulsates through us all, waiting to be exposed.

As the film opens we see what on face value appears to be the kindling of a romantic encounter between Louie (Mackenzie Fearnley) and Irene (Shabana Azeez), and various short scenes indicating a solidified bond, but as the time passes we see that the cracks are starting to show with Irene housebound, dependent on Louie’s partnership. But what is truly hindering her and how genuine is Louie’s heart? The feature allows us to unearth the truth over a  bucks night, where Louie strangely asks Irene to be a part of. Is this romantic or controlling?

Accompanying them are Louie’s two best mates, Dylan (Ben Hunter), the larrikin of the group but who also hides behind the facade of bravado and humour; and Charlie (Jack Bannister), a devout Christian with pent up sexual frustration, who also brings along his partner, Grace (Clementine Anderson). Grace’s role as far as the men are concerned, is to keep Irene company, but again the plans to control or dictate proceedings will fall sour before the night is through. Also, among the retreat is Murph (Alfie Gledhill) a somewhat isolated figure from the troupe, who blends in well with the male-orientated pursuits brandishing a false hope and a pre-arranged task to carry out. And lastly is Sam (Harley Wilson), a friend of Irenes and fuel to the fire of emotions as Louie questions their motives and faithfulness.

With the players set to play their identified roles, the night has just begun, and the real identities will spring forth to reveal darker and subdued emotional privilege simmering beneath the surface.

The Prognosis:

The subject matter could easily have been overplayed, but both Weir and Clark offer a slow hand to strengthen their cause and allow the characters to sink into the mire. The revelations of the motives set by the players of the piece is masterful and with every ounce of dedication and respect by the acting troupe who portray them. The light is shone firmly on this toxic masculinity without much reprieve or solution, but once the gaze is cast, it’s hard to turn away from the core message. For that Birdeater is a topical and relevant piece that deserves your time and energy. It is another fine Australian feature that lifts above the noise and resonates with its wings, beating out a very clear and precise observation of Australia and its current culture.

  • Saul Muerte

Birdeater is currently screening at selective cinemas nationwide.

Maxxxine: A Stylish Nod to the 80s That Falls Short in Substance

12 Friday Jul 2024

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

We’re fast approaching 20 years since director Ti West released his first feature film, The Roost. Since then, he has meticulously crafted his signature style behind the lens, primarily in the realm of horror. Notable among these features are The House of the Devil, The Innkeepers, and The Sacrament. However, arguably his latest venture with actress Mia Goth in what has become the X film series has garnered the most attention. The first of these, X, was a significant hit in 2022, with its unique spin on the slasher genre and notable nods to the 70s films that marked the industry, such as The Texas Chain Saw Massacre. Just when we thought our horror appetite was satiated, West delivered another serving with Pearl, which arced back to 1918 with the titular villain, again played by Goth, and was infused with the birth of Technicolor films.

So, with the announcement that a third installment was on the horizon and would be set in the heart of the 80s—the era of big hair, big action, and high levels of glorious entertainment—needless to say, I was eager to see the finale and had highlighted this as one of the most anticipated movies of the year.

Upon watching Maxxxine, the final installment in Ti West’s trilogy, it’s evident that while the film possesses a lot of style and pays notable homage to the films of the 80s, it unfortunately falls short in substance. The era’s aesthetic is captured impeccably, from the vibrant neon lights to the pulsating synth-heavy soundtrack. The attention to detail in recreating the 80s is commendable, with West and his team clearly putting a lot of effort into making the film feel authentic to the time period.

Mia Goth once again delivers a strong performance, embodying the titular character with a raw intensity that has become a hallmark of the series. Her portrayal of Maxxxine is layered and compelling, and she brings a magnetic presence to the screen that is hard to ignore. The supporting cast also does a commendable job, with each actor fitting seamlessly into the world West has created.

However, where Maxxxine stumbles is in its narrative depth and impact. The plot feels somewhat thin, lacking the same level of intrigue and tension that made X and Pearl so engaging. While the film is packed with stylistic nods to the 80s and bursts of nostalgia, it doesn’t quite manage to weave these elements into a story that resonates on a deeper level. The themes explored in the previous films seem to be diluted here, and the emotional stakes never quite reach the heights that fans might have hoped for.

Additionally, the film’s climax, while visually impressive, doesn’t deliver the satisfying conclusion that the trilogy deserved. It feels restrained, not going as big or bold as one might expect for the final chapter of such an ambitious series. There are moments of brilliance scattered throughout, but they are often overshadowed by a sense of missed potential and unfulfilled promises.

The Prognosis:

Maxxxine‘s vibrant depiction of the 80s serves as a colorful facade, masking the deeper issues at hand—a fitting metaphor for the film itself, which dazzles with style but lacks the impactful substance beneath the surface.

  • Saul Muerte

Movie Review: A Quiet Place: Day One (2024)

01 Monday Jul 2024

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

The latest installment in the “A Quiet Place” franchise takes an interesting yet noteworthy sidestep within the world created by John Krasinski and Michael Sarnoski. Where the first movie shook the apocalyptic landscape to the core through the gaze of a family in crisis, grief, and fractured unity, evoking deep emotional reactions from its audience (and marking one of the best horror features released in 2018 for this reviewer), its follow-up arguably fell short. It followed the family dynamic, then searched for refuge via the ambiguous Emmet (Cillian Murphy). As good as Murphy is, the franchise was missing a little depth and, in doing so, trod familiar ground—still softly, mind you.

Now, in its third installment, “A Quiet Place: Day One” turns the dial back to the initial astronomical event that would bring about the invasion of the blind extraterrestrial creatures, who, despite not having an official name, go by the moniker Death Angels.

This premise makes one sit up, ready to dive back into the franchise with the hopes that it would signal more from these terrifying creatures… and yet… and yet.

As the feature begins, we’re presented with the ailing Samira (Lupita Nyong’o – “Us“), who is terminally ill with cancer, living in a hospice on the outskirts of New York with her service cat, Frodo. What I love about this notion is that we’re presented with a character who faces death daily, never knowing when her last breath will be, even poetically counting down her prediction in a prose she keeps in her notebook. When Samira travels to New York with her fellow hospice patients to see a marionette show, she comes face-to-face with an evil that has most of the human race running for their lives. Samira, however, only has one thought on her mind: to have pizza in Harlem, where her memories of listening to her father play the piano reside. This kernel drive epitomizes Samira’s character, knowing her time is near, she isn’t fearful of the end but wants to meet her maker on her own terms. It’s a performance that ebbs and flows through every ounce of energy as Samira struggles to hold onto the strength to see her through to the end—a performance that Nyong’o excels in, captivating the audience with every subtle change in her expressions throughout the movie.

Thrown into the mix is a lost English law student, Eric (Joseph Quinn – “Stranger Things“), who, like the audience, is drawn to the headstrong Samira for salvation amidst the anarchy that rains down around them. To Quinn’s credit, he delivers a credible performance to balance against Nyong’o’s and, at certain parts, provides the heart and empathy when Samira needs it most. But it is the strength of Samira’s will that supports their journey, often providing the rod to Eric’s back, juxtaposing her own declining health.

All this about performance, but what about those pesky Death Angels, I hear you cry… I mean whisper. Unfortunately, they almost become secondary to the narrative, and when they do appear, it is more of a swarm than a slow creeping dread. While this has an effect of its own, it never quite measures up to its predecessors. This could be forgiven to a degree, as I mentioned Nyong’o is phenomenal in this, but by relying too much on the humanity of the piece, the narrative suffers under the weight of the slow middle act.

The Prognosis:

While writer/director Michael Sarnovski does his best to add another chapter to the universe, and it’s clear to see where the film draws inspiration from “Children of Men” with its visual style, the slow pace tends to stretch a little thin and grows tedious. The film is owned by Lupita Nyong’o, though, who is able to captivate and engage with every interaction, drawing you in and keeping you hooked to her performance, wishing for the road to survival to be fruitful.

  • Saul Muerte

Remembering Donald Sutherland, A Legend of Horror

21 Friday Jun 2024

Posted by in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , ,

Donald Sutherland, the legendary Canadian actor whose prolific career spanned over six decades, left an indelible mark on the world of cinema, particularly in the horror genre. His recent passing has prompted a reflection on his vast body of work and the profound impact he had on film. Sutherland’s distinctive presence and formidable talent made him an icon, known for his compelling performances and the unique intensity he brought to his roles. Among his extensive filmography, Sutherland’s work in “Don’t Look Now” and “Invasion of the Body Snatchers” stands out as a testament to his exceptional ability to embody fear, paranoia, and vulnerability.

Sutherland’s journey in horror is punctuated by a series of memorable roles that showcased his versatility and depth. His role in Nicolas Roeg’s “Don’t Look Now” (1973) is particularly iconic. In this hauntingly atmospheric film, Sutherland portrayed John Baxter, a grieving father grappling with the tragic death of his daughter. His performance is a masterclass in conveying profound sorrow and mounting terror as John navigates the labyrinthine canals of Venice, haunted by visions and premonitions. Sutherland’s ability to portray raw emotion and psychological complexity added layers to the film’s eerie and unsettling narrative, making his character’s journey both heartbreaking and terrifying.

Similarly, Sutherland’s role in the 1978 adaptation of “Invasion of the Body Snatchers” further cemented his status as a horror legend. In this sci-fi horror classic, Sutherland played Matthew Bennell, a health inspector who slowly uncovers the horrifying truth about an alien invasion that replaces humans with emotionless duplicates. His portrayal of Bennell is marked by a gradual transformation from skepticism to sheer terror, mirroring the audience’s own journey through the film’s escalating tension. Sutherland’s performance is a tour de force of building suspense, and his ability to convey fear and paranoia with such authenticity made him a standout in an already stellar cast.

Donald Sutherland’s contribution to horror extended to numerous other films that have since become classics. His performances in “The Hunger Games” series as President Snow, although not purely horror, showed his ability to embody sinister characters with chilling effectiveness. Sutherland’s success in horror and thriller genres can be attributed to his unparalleled ability to tap into the human psyche’s darkest corners. His characters often embodied the everyman confronting unimaginable horrors, making his performances all the more relatable and terrifying.

Beyond his roles in horror, Sutherland’s career is marked by a remarkable range of characters and genres. From his early work in “M*A*S*H*” to his critically acclaimed performances in films like “Ordinary People” and “Klute,” Sutherland consistently demonstrated his versatility and depth as an actor. However, it is his work in horror that left a lasting impression, showcasing his unique talent for creating tension and fear.

Reflecting on Donald Sutherland’s career is to acknowledge a legacy that transcends the horror genre. His work in “Don’t Look Now” and “Invasion of the Body Snatchers” exemplifies his unique talent for embodying complex characters and creating unforgettable cinematic moments. Sutherland’s impact on cinema is undeniable, and his performances continue to inspire and captivate audiences, ensuring that his legacy lives on.

As we remember Donald Sutherland, we celebrate not only his contributions to horror but also his remarkable ability to bring complex characters to life. His work remains a benchmark for actors in the genre, a testament to his enduring talent and the indelible mark he left on the world of film.

  • Saul Muerte

Under Paris: A Sinking Shark Thriller with Fleeting Moments of Frenzy

06 Thursday Jun 2024

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , ,

Netflix’s Under Paris attempts to dive deep into the shark horror genre, but unfortunately, it mostly treads water. While the film does have its moments, it ultimately feels like a mish-mash of recycled tropes, CGI overload, and a lack of genuine tension that leaves viewers unsatisfied.

The premise of Under Paris is intriguing enough: in order to save Paris from an international bloodbath, a grieving scientist is forced to face her tragic past when a giant shark appears in the Seine. However, the execution falls flat. The movie churns out all the shark horror chum we’ve seen before, blending it into an uninspired and predictable narrative. The CGI sharks lack realism, making it hard to suspend disbelief, and their overuse detracts from any potential suspense.

One of the most glaring issues is the film’s inability to build and maintain tension. Scenes that should be pulse-pounding instead feel routine and lackluster. The constant reliance on jump scares and clichéd horror elements fails to evoke the kind of dread that makes for a memorable shark horror film.

That said, Under Paris isn’t without its redeeming qualities. The catacombs scene stands out as a highlight, offering a chaotic and entertaining spectacle. The claustrophobic setting, combined with the frenetic pace, injects a dose of much-needed excitement and mayhem. It’s a brief glimpse of what the film could have been with better execution and more imaginative storytelling.

However, these moments are few and far between. Too many scenes are visually disorienting, resembling the view from inside a washing machine. This shaky, swirling camera work detracts from the action and leaves viewers feeling more nauseous than thrilled. It’s a stylistic choice that might have aimed to enhance the sense of panic but instead contributes to the overall sense of disarray.

In conclusion, Under Paris sinks more than it swims. Despite a few fun moments in the catacombs, the film is bogged down by overdone CGI, lack of tension, and disorienting cinematography. While it may offer some superficial thrills for die-hard fans of the genre, it ultimately fails to leave a lasting impression.

The Prognosis:

Under Paris is now streaming on Netflix, but unless you’re a completist for shark horror films, you might find yourself diving into disappointment.

  • Saul Muerte

Movie Review: Frogman (2023)

04 Tuesday Jun 2024

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , ,

Anthony Cousins’ Frogman croaks its way onto Screambox with a premise that delves into the eerie legend of the Loveland Frogman. This found footage horror flick follows three friends on a quest to uncover the truth behind the local amphibious cryptid, only to discover that the legend holds more truth—and terror—than they could have imagined.

Frogman draws heavily from the influential found footage classic The Blair Witch Project. This influence is evident in both the film’s strengths and its weaknesses. On the one hand, the similarities lend Frogman a sense of nostalgic familiarity. The shaky camera work, the realistic portrayals of fear, and the gradual build-up of suspense all harken back to Blair Witch, grounding Frogman in a tried-and-true formula that successfully evokes a creeping sense of dread.

The found footage style effectively immerses the viewer in the trio’s journey. The film’s setting—dense, misty woods—adds to the atmosphere, with the natural sounds of the forest punctuated by unsettling croaks that hint at the lurking presence of the Frogman. The tension builds slowly but steadily, leading to several genuinely chilling moments as the friends inch closer to the truth.

However, the film’s adherence to the Blair Witch template also highlights some of its limitations. Frogman struggles to break new ground, often feeling like a retread of familiar territory rather than a fresh take on the found footage genre. The characters, while likable, sometimes fall into predictable patterns, and the plot occasionally meanders, losing momentum in places where it should be tightening the suspense.

Despite these issues, Frogman manages to carve out its own identity, thanks largely to the intriguing legend at its core. The Loveland Frogman is a fascinating figure, and the film’s exploration of this cryptid adds a layer of originality that helps to distinguish it from its predecessors. The climax, while somewhat conventional, delivers enough thrills to satisfy fans of the genre.

In conclusion, Frogman is a solid entry into the found footage horror canon. It may not fully escape the shadow of The Blair Witch Project, but it leverages its similarities to craft an engaging and eerie experience. For those who enjoy cryptid lore and slow-burn horror, Frogman is worth a watch—just don’t expect it to completely revolutionize the genre.

The Prognosis:

The croaks are no hoax! Frogman hops onto Screambox exclusively on June 7. Don’t miss this ribbiting found footage curio as it explores the chilling local legend of the Loveland Frogman.

  • Saul Muerte

“Sink or Swim: Night Swim Struggles to Stay Afloat in Murky Waters of Horror”

23 Thursday May 2024

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

Night Swim fails to make a splash in the horror genre, sinking beneath the weight of its own ambitions. Director Bryce McGuire’s debut feature struggles to maintain momentum, ultimately drowning in a sea of clichés and narrative inconsistencies.

The film’s premise, though initially intriguing, quickly loses its grip, failing to deliver on its promise of supernatural terror. What begins as a potentially compelling exploration of family dynamics and sinister forces lurking in suburbia devolves into a muddled mess of predictable scares and convoluted mythology.

One of the film’s major shortcomings lies in its inability to fully explore its central concept. Despite hints of a chilling backstory involving sacrifices and demonic entities, Night Swim never delves deep enough to provide a satisfying payoff. Instead, it treads water, recycling tired tropes without adding meaningful depth.

While the performances by Wyatt Russell and Kerry Condon are serviceable, their characters feel underdeveloped and fail to engage the audience beyond serving as vessels for jump scares.

The pacing suffers from a lack of tension, with scenes dragging on without purpose, leaving viewers feeling adrift rather than immersed in the narrative.

Even the technical aspects of the film fall short. While the underwater sequences are competently shot, they lack the immersive quality needed to captivate audiences.

The Prognosis:

Night Swim proves to be a forgettable addition to the horror genre. Despite moments of genuine tension, it ultimately fails to leave a lasting impression, leaving viewers longing for a more engaging and coherent experience.

  • Saul Muerte

“Surviving the Night: The Strangers Return in a Relentless Battle for Survival – A Review of The Strangers: Chapter 1”

21 Tuesday May 2024

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

The Strangers: Chapter 1, the latest installment in the iconic horror franchise, attempts to resurrect the chilling atmosphere of the original while introducing fresh faces and a new narrative arc. Directed by Renny Harlin and penned by Alan R. Cohen and Alan Freedland, this film marks the beginning of an ambitious standalone trilogy, set within the same universe as its predecessor.

The plot follows Maya (Madelaine Petsch) and Ryan (Froy Gutierrez), a couple on a road trip celebrating their five-year anniversary. Their journey takes a sinister turn when they encounter three masked strangers in a small town. Stranded in an Airbnb for the night, they find themselves hunted by these psychopaths, leading to a nightmarish fight for survival.

While The Strangers: Chapter 1 boasts the iconic look of its villains and promises of a revitalized franchise, it struggles to break free from the formulaic constraints of its predecessors. The plot feels like familiar territory, relying on well-worn horror tropes without offering much in terms of innovation. However, the film’s tense atmosphere and relentless pacing keep viewers on the edge of their seats, even if the narrative feels somewhat predictable.

The performances by Petsch and Gutierrez anchor the film, portraying a couple caught in a terrifying ordeal with believable fear and desperation. The supporting cast, including Gabriel Basso and Ema Horvath, adds depth to the ensemble, although their characters feel underdeveloped amidst the chaos.

Visually, the film delivers a gritty and claustrophobic experience, effectively capturing the sense of dread and isolation permeating the narrative. Harlin’s direction keeps the tension high, utilizing tight spaces and ominous lighting to heighten the suspense.

Despite its shortcomings, The Strangers: Chapter 1 serves as a decent entry in the franchise, setting the stage for future installments. With promises of more to come, it remains to be seen if the subsequent chapters will offer a fresh take on the familiar premise or succumb to the pitfalls of repetition.

The Prognosis:

The Strangers: Chapter 1 may not reinvent the horror genre, but it offers enough thrills and chills to satisfy fans of the series while leaving room for improvement in its sequels.

  • Saul Muerte