The forest doesn’t care about you. It doesn’t care about your excuses, your regrets, your carefully constructed lies. Out there, among the trees, the world strips itself down to its bones — dirt, bark, roots, breath. That’s where Marc Schölermann drags us with Bark, a taut psychological thriller that ties both its protagonist and its audience to the raw elements of survival, guilt, and reckoning.
It begins with a man bound to a tree — a literal prisoner of nature and a figurative captive of his own sins. Charismatic Nolan Bentley wakes disoriented, tied down in the belly of a remote German forest. Enter the mysterious stranger, a figure both tormentor and liberator, whose taunting presence digs deeper than any rope ever could. The question isn’t just whether Bentley can escape. The question is whether he deserves to.
Bark is at its sharpest when it leans into this elemental battle: man vs. nature, man vs. stranger, man vs. himself. Schölermann uses the forest not as a backdrop but as a psychological weapon — the trees loom like silent judges, the soil feels heavy with secrets, and every snap of a branch echoes like a gavel slamming down in a cosmic courtroom.
At its core, the film isn’t about knots and ropes, it’s about consequences. You can’t disassociate from your own past forever; eventually the demons scratch their way through the bark and claw at your skin. Bark dramatises that inexorable truth with sweat, soil, and tension so tight it feels like the trees themselves are holding their breath.
The performances ground it — Bentley sells both desperation and denial, while the enigmatic outdoorsman needles and prods until every scab of guilt bursts open. And though the film runs its tension on a fairly narrow track, the payoff is a psychological unearthing that hits with the force of an axe to the trunk.
The Prognosis:
Bark is not just a thriller. It’s a meditation on accountability, guilt, and the way nature can strip us bare until we are nothing but the truth we tried to bury. Some secrets don’t stay hidden. Some forests don’t let you out.
This darkly feminist fairy tale slow-burns its way through vanity, envy, and the societal curse of beauty.
In Emilie Kristine Blichfeldt’s icy, melancholic The Ugly Stepsister, the velvet drapes and soft golden glows of the fairy tale kingdom mask something far more corrosive: the bitter ache of envy, inadequacy, and the impossible pressure to be seen. It’s a film that peers behind the glass slipper and turns the looking glass back on us—audiences raised on ideals of beauty, charm, and happy endings for the fairest of them all.
The titular “ugly” stepsister, Elvira (Lea Myren), is not the cackling caricature of pantomime lore. Played with aching restraint, she’s a quiet storm of desperation and longing—her plainness not exaggerated but perceptibly measured against the luminous perfection of her stepsister, who seems preordained to capture the prince’s attention. The film’s magic lies not in spells or transformations, but in its psychological excavation of a woman unraveling under the weight of expectation and invisibility.
Blichfeldt wisely avoids overt parody or satire. Instead, she leans into the fairy tale structure only to slowly erode it, exposing the emotional and societal cost of a world built on outward beauty. In Elvira’s quiet glances, her tightening posture, and her increasing willingness to bend morality in pursuit of admiration, we witness something tragic: not a villainess in the making, but a reflection of how warped self-worth becomes in a world that equates beauty with value.
The film’s pacing is deliberate, sometimes to a fault. It takes its time—almost too much—in building its portrait of simmering resentment and warped aspiration. But the stillness serves a purpose: The Ugly Stepsister is less concerned with plot propulsion than with emotional erosion. This is no Cinderella story, even if it steals her ballgown. It’s a study in marginalisation—of being the one never chosen, never seen, and never allowed to dream on her own terms.
Though the production design is gorgeously oppressive—regal and cold in equal measure—it’s the thematic spine that resonates: the film’s commentary on the female experience within patriarchal beauty myths. Elvira’s descent isn’t driven by malice, but by an internalised belief that to be loved, she must first be looked at. It’s a bitter irony that in pursuing visibility, she must become someone—something—unrecognisable.
The Prognosis:
The Ugly Stepsister doesn’t always land its punches with perfect clarity and might frustrate viewers expecting a more dramatic reversal or fantasy payoff. Blichfeldt isn’t rewriting a fairy tale—she’s exhuming it, pulling up what’s been buried beneath centuries of curated perfection.
In this world, beauty is not a blessing. It’s a prison. And for those left outside its gates, the fairy tale is a nightmare told in soft pastels and sharpened smiles.
La Bête (1975), directed by Walerian Borowczyk, remains one of the most controversial films in the history of French cinema, and for good reason. An unsettling blend of horror, fantasy, and eroticism, the film challenged societal norms by confronting the taboo subject of bestiality, while also exploring themes of sexual repression and the dark recesses of human desire. While its provocative subject matter may have shocked audiences at the time, La Bête‘s impact on the fairytale genre is undeniable, as it distorts and dismantles the traditional, innocent imagery typically associated with fables.
The film’s plot centres on a young woman, played by Sirpa Lane, who is sent to an isolated mansion to care for a family member, only to discover that the house’s bizarre and sexually charged atmosphere hides a deeply unsettling secret. It is there that she finds herself drawn into a surreal and grotesque relationship with a monstrous beast, played by the infamous animal actor, the titular “beast.” The beast’s primal instincts are interwoven with the protagonist’s sexual awakening, creating a narrative that is both disturbing and strangely hypnotic.
One of La Bête‘s most striking features is how it blends the fantastical with the grotesque, challenging the audience’s expectations of what a fairytale is supposed to represent. In a genre traditionally known for its innocence, purity, and moral lessons, La Bête flips the narrative on its head, replacing magical creatures and romantic ideals with sexual depravity and psychological torment. The fairytale-like setting—lush, lavish, and seemingly enchanted—becomes a place of perverse fantasy, where innocence is stripped away, and dark, hidden desires come to light. The sexualization of the beast and the protagonist’s complex relationship with it force the viewer to confront uncomfortable questions about the nature of desire, fantasy, and the human psyche.
At the heart of the film is its exploration of sexual repression. The characters, both human and animal, seem locked in a struggle with their desires, attempting to navigate the constraints imposed by society, and by their own identities. The beast, though monstrous in form, is portrayed as a creature driven by raw, unfiltered lust, a force of nature beyond human control. The woman, in contrast, is initially portrayed as a character torn between fear and fascination, unable to suppress her own desires, despite the taboo nature of the relationship. In its own strange way, La Bête highlights the violence inherent in both human and animal instinct, suggesting that society’s repression of such instincts can lead to horrifying outcomes.
However, it is this very subject matter that also invites criticism. The film’s depiction of bestiality, while artfully filmed and purposefully provocative, can be difficult to watch. The boundary-pushing nature of the film has drawn its fair share of ire over the years, with some arguing that it borders on exploitation. Whether La Bête’s treatment of its controversial subject matter is exploitative or merely an exploration of human sexuality’s most forbidden corners is open to interpretation, but what remains clear is that Borowczyk’s approach was undeniably daring.
The film’s visuals are haunting and surreal, filled with long, lingering shots of the beast, the protagonist’s vulnerable expressions, and the haunting, otherworldly beauty of the mansion. The lavish, often dreamlike atmosphere creates an intoxicating mood, one that’s simultaneously erotic and nightmarish, as if the fairytale itself is slowly being suffocated by darker forces. The performances, particularly from Sirpa Lane, manage to convey both the fragility and complexity of her character, even in the most uncomfortable of situations.
La Bête is a deeply unsettling film that works on multiple levels—visually, emotionally, and intellectually. Its exploration of taboo desires and its subversion of the traditional fairytale makes it an unforgettable piece of cinema, though one that is not for the faint of heart. While its controversial content may overshadow its artistic merits for some viewers, there’s no denying that Borowczyk’s audacious approach remains a unique entry in the genre. La Bête is both disturbing and beautiful, and it forces the audience to confront the darker aspects of human sexuality in a way few films have ever dared to do.
Ultimately, La Bête is a bold, fascinating work that demands a careful, critical eye. It may not be for everyone, but for those willing to engage with its challenging themes, it remains a haunting exploration of desire and the grotesque.
Surgeons of Horror 