• About
  • podcasts
  • Shop

Surgeons of Horror

~ Dissecting horror films

Surgeons of Horror

Monthly Archives: April 2025

Ugly Truths and Unforgettable Performances: Revisiting Poor Pretty Eddie at 50

16 Wednesday Apr 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

blaxploitation, leslie uggams, poor pretty eddie, shelley winters

It’s been 50 years since Poor Pretty Eddie first bled onto grindhouse screens—an exploitation oddity so unrelenting in tone, it still rattles the nerves. Directed by Richard Robinson and David Worth, this backwoods fever dream masquerades as a cautionary tale but plays out more like a cultural endurance test. Yet, even within its murky execution and dubious intent, a pair of unforgettable performances rise above the muck.

Lesley Uggams, cast against type as jazz singer Liz Wetherly, is the emotional core of the film. Her portrayal is both defiant and devastating, as her character is stranded, isolated, and ultimately brutalised in a world thick with racial animosity and patriarchal cruelty. Shelley Winters, meanwhile, leans into grotesque Southern Gothic as Bertha, the deluded former starlet whose fading glamour and bitterness curdle into complicity. Together, these two women anchor the film with performances that are far more compelling than the script deserves.

The story is minimal—a wrong turn leads Liz to an isolated Georgia lodge where Eddie, a preening and dangerous wannabe Elvis (played with jittery menace by Michael Christian), holds sway under Bertha’s unstable watch. What follows is a grim and often exploitative descent into humiliation, abuse, and domination.

At the heart of Poor Pretty Eddie lies a scathing, if poorly handled, examination of systemic white supremacy in the American South. The film doesn’t shy away from making race the centerpiece of its tension—Liz’s every interaction is filtered through the hostile gaze of a white society determined to strip her of autonomy. There’s an ugliness to the way this is handled, and a leering sensationalism that taints the message, but the subtext is undeniably there: this is a tale about a Black woman’s body and spirit being colonised, scrutinised, and fought over in a place that sees her as nothing more than an intruder.

What’s most haunting, perhaps, is that the film’s ugliest behaviors and racist ideologies remain deeply relevant. In its raw depiction of institutional and interpersonal racism—especially how it is normalised, ignored, or celebrated by those in power—Poor Pretty Eddie still finds uncomfortable resonance in 2025.

Unfortunately, the exploitative style undermines much of the film’s thematic potential. The gratuitous nature of the violence, the sleazy tone, and the amateurish editing reduce powerful commentary to provocation. The direction is uneven, and the pacing is meandering, trapping viewers in a murky stew of misogyny and nihilism without offering a satisfying critique or catharsis.

As an artifact of its era, Poor Pretty Eddie is fascinating and infuriating in equal measure. But as a film, it buckles under the weight of its own grotesquery. Still, thanks to Uggams and Winters, the film leaves a mark—even if it’s more bruise than breakthrough.

  • Saul Muerte

Dead Mail Delivers Style, But Forgets the Substance

15 Tuesday Apr 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

shudder, shudder australia

An 80s-inspired mystery with a killer synth score gets lost in its own overwritten posturing.

There’s something undeniably intriguing about the premise of Dead Mail—a mysterious cry for help lands in a 1980s post office, pulling a dead letter investigator into the orbit of a kidnapped keyboard technician. It’s weird, it’s retro, and it’s got all the makings of an offbeat cult thriller. Unfortunately, it never quite delivers on that potential.

What starts as a stylised mystery told through a unique lens quickly buckles under the weight of its own self-importance. The dialogue, while initially compelling, becomes increasingly laborious—a dense and indulgent spiral of overwritten musings that feel more like cinematic wankery than meaningful character development. The film leans hard on its quirkiness, but instead of building tension or intrigue, it feels like it’s stalling for time.

Where Dead Mail does shine is in its sonic world. The synth-heavy score pulses with personality, creating an ambient hum of unease that subtly underscores the surreal premise. There’s a genuine love for the analog here—tape decks, clunky tech, and circuit boards become part of the storytelling language, and the music stitches it all together with a retrofuturist flair. The score doesn’t just support the film—it elevates it, becoming its own kind of character: detached, nostalgic, and oddly haunted.

That said, atmosphere alone can’t carry a film this narratively inert. As Dead Mail lingers in endless corridors of conversation and cryptic visuals, the tension flatlines. There’s too much effort in trying to sound profound and not enough substance to back it up. What could have been a tight, unsettling dive into lost messages and fractured identity ends up feeling like a late-night transmission from the Twilight Zone that didn’t quite come through.

The Prognosis:

For all its eccentricities, this dead letter is best returned to sender.

  • Saul Muerte

Dead Mail will be streaming on Shudder from Fri 18th Apr.

Murder, Money, and Misfires in Daniel’s Gotta Die

14 Monday Apr 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Dysfunction, greed, and a body count—what could go wrong?

On paper, Daniel’s Gotta Die has all the ingredients for a riotous dark comedy: a wealthy family reunion set in the Cayman Islands, a fortune up for grabs, and a protagonist too pure for the backstabbing world around him. But despite a promising premise and a few moments of eccentric charm, this madcap tale of familial betrayal rarely hits the mark, stumbling more often than it soars.

Following the sudden death of the Powell family patriarch, Daniel (Joel David Moore) is named sole heir to the family fortune—on one condition. His estranged siblings must survive a bonding weekend together at the family’s lavish beach house. What Daniel envisions as a healing reunion quickly spirals into a murder-fueled farce, as his greedy relatives plot to eliminate him and claim the inheritance for themselves.

The setup is ripe for biting satire, but Jeremy Lalonde’s direction never fully leans into the chaos or emotional core the story seems to reach for. The pacing drags, the tonal shifts are jarring, and the comedic timing often feels off. Despite the colourful cast—including Mary Lynn Rajskub, Carly Chaikin, and the late Bob Saget in one of his final roles—the performances feel underutilised, lacking the punch needed to elevate the material. Even Iggy Pop’s brief appearance registers more as novelty than narrative necessity.

Joel David Moore gives Daniel an endearing naïveté, and the film’s central question—whether goodness can survive in a world poisoned by greed—has potential. But the sincerity clashes with the film’s broader, more cartoonish elements. It’s a movie at odds with itself, unsure whether it wants to be a zany murder comedy or a morality tale with heart.

The Prognosis:

Daniel’s Gotta Die may amuse some viewers with its outlandish premise and offbeat energy, but it ultimately feels like a missed opportunity. It aims for a twisted family portrait but delivers a sketch that’s only half-filled in.

  • Saul Muerte

The Amityville Horror (2005): Twenty Years Later, Still All Flash, No Chill

14 Monday Apr 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Ryan Reynolds brings the rage, but this remake forgets what made the original so haunting.

Two decades on, The Amityville Horror (2005) still stands as one of the more prominent attempts to resurrect a horror legacy that’s seen more sequels, spin-offs, and reboots than most franchises could survive. But while this glossy reimagining may boast higher production values and a memorable performance from Ryan Reynolds, it ultimately trades away the creeping dread of the 1979 original for jump scares and visual bombast.

Directed by Andrew Douglas, the remake wastes no time in dialing up the intensity, diving into its supernatural beats with an urgency that’s both jarring and oddly hollow. Gone is the patient, simmering tension of Stuart Rosenberg’s original film—where James Brolin’s slow unraveling added genuine unease. Reynolds, to his credit, gives it his all, and while he captures the transformation into the increasingly unhinged George Lutz with gusto, there’s a lack of the brooding gravitas that Brolin effortlessly embodied. He’s intense, yes, but intensity without nuance quickly becomes noise.

As for Melissa George, this reviewer will admit a soft spot—she brings an emotional steadiness to the role of Kathy Lutz, and her presence elevates scenes that might otherwise collapse under the weight of Douglas’ heavy-handed direction. But even her grounded performance can’t escape the remake’s overarching flaw: its overreliance on style over substance.

The original Amityville Horror succeeded not just because of its infamous “true story” marketing hook, but because it knew how to build atmosphere. The 2005 version, unfortunately, seems determined to blow the doors off the house from the start. Any notion of slow-burn psychological torment is bulldozed by jump scares, flickering spectres, and flash-cut haunted house theatrics.

In the years since, many have tried to return to Amityville with diminishing returns. Oddly, it was filmmakers like James Wan and Leigh Whannell—clearly inspired by this brand of haunted house horror—who came closer to the spirit of what made the original chilling. Their Conjuring universe didn’t just pay homage; it refined the formula and found a new audience hungry for the quiet dread and escalating horror the Amityville franchise once promised.

The Prognosis:

At twenty years old, The Amityville Horror (2005) remains a sleek but soulless retelling. It may still attract casual horror fans and those nostalgic for mid-2000s supernatural thrillers, but it serves mostly as a reminder that atmosphere, patience, and suggestion often haunt the mind far longer than a house full of CGI ghosts.

  • Saul Muerte

Fear No Evil (1969) – A Reflective Look at Occult TV Horror

12 Saturday Apr 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

1960s horror, 1960s retrospective, louis jourdan

By the late 1960s, television horror was beginning to dip its toes into more psychological and supernatural territory, often embracing the occult with varying degrees of success. Fear No Evil (1969), directed by Paul Wendkos, fits squarely into this mold, offering a made-for-TV horror experience that flirts with interesting ideas but ultimately feels constrained by its small-screen limitations.

The story follows Dr. David Sorell (Louis Jourdan), a psychiatrist with a particular interest in the supernatural, as he becomes entangled in a case involving an antique mirror with a sinister history. The mirror’s influence extends beyond the realm of the living, allowing a grieving fiancée to reconnect with her deceased former lover. What begins as a promising supernatural mystery soon devolves into a predictable exercise in TV-movie theatrics, relying more on melodrama than genuine chills.

Jourdan, ever the consummate professional, carries the film with an air of refined authority. His performance elevates the material slightly, making even the more overwrought moments watchable. He leans into the gothic atmosphere with conviction, though the film itself doesn’t always support his efforts. The occult elements, while intriguing, never reach their full potential, often feeling more like window dressing than integral components of the plot.

Visually, Fear No Evil does what it can within its limited budget, employing shadowy lighting and moody cinematography to create an eerie ambiance. However, the production values betray its television origins, making it difficult to shake the feeling that this could have been an episode of an anthology series rather than a standalone feature. The film lacks the polish and cinematic depth of its theatrical contemporaries, and its pacing suffers as a result—dragging when it should build tension.

Despite its shortcomings, Fear No Evil was notable enough to warrant a spiritual follow-up, Ritual of Evil (1970), which continued Dr. Sorell’s supernatural investigations. This suggests that there was an audience for this type of made-for-TV horror, even if it never quite managed to transcend its format.

The Prognosis:

In the end, Fear No Evil is a passable, albeit forgettable, occult thriller that never fully commits to the weight of its premise. While Louis Jourdan gives it his all, the film struggles to break free from its “cheesy TV movie” trappings, leaving it as little more than a curiosity for genre enthusiasts rather than a must-see classic.

  • Saul Muerte

Cat’s Eye at 40: Stephen King’s Underrated Anthology Still Scratches the Horror Itch

11 Friday Apr 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

drew barrymore, horror anthology, james woods, lewis teague, Stephen King

By the mid-1980s, Stephen King had already become a powerhouse name in horror cinema, with adaptations of Carrie (1976), The Shining (1980), and Christine (1983) cementing his influence. Cat’s Eye (1985), directed by Lewis Teague, took a different approach by presenting a horror anthology linked by a wandering feline. While it may not reach the same heights as King’s most revered works, Cat’s Eye remains a solid genre effort, offering a mix of psychological tension, supernatural horror, and dark humour.

The film’s triptych of tales begins with “Quitters, Inc.,” starring James Woods as a desperate man who enrolls in a sinister program to quit smoking, only to find the methods more terrifying than expected. Woods delivers a strong performance, balancing paranoia with nervous energy, making his character’s predicament all the more gripping. The second story, “The Ledge,” follows Robert Hays as a gambler forced to traverse the narrow ledge of a high-rise building by a vengeful crime boss. This segment is packed with suspense and effectively utilises vertigo-inducing cinematography to heighten the tension.

The final segment, “General,” shifts into a more supernatural realm, with a young Drew Barrymore playing a girl tormented by a malevolent gnome that only her stray cat, General, seems to understand. Barrymore, fresh off E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982) and Firestarter (1984), once again proves herself a strong child actor, giving the film a heart amid its more macabre elements. Her presence adds emotional weight to an otherwise whimsical horror entry, ensuring the audience remains invested in her fate.

Director Lewis Teague, who had previously helmed Cujo (1983), brings a polished visual style to Cat’s Eye, ensuring each segment has its own distinct atmosphere. While the stories vary in intensity, the film remains engaging throughout, aided by King’s darkly humorous and inventive storytelling. The anthology format allows for quick pacing, though it also means that not all segments leave a lasting impact.

The Prognosis:

As a whole, Cat’s Eye is a respectable entry in the pantheon of King adaptations, offering enough thrills and memorable performances to make it a worthwhile watch. While it may not be the most iconic of King’s cinematic ventures, its mix of psychological horror, dark comedy, and supernatural tension make it a unique entry in his filmography. Forty years later, it remains an enjoyable, if somewhat underrated, slice of 80s horror cinema.

  • Saul Muerte

Preachy and Painless: Shadow of God Lacks Spirit

08 Tuesday Apr 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

jacqueline byers, mark o'brien, shudder, shudder australia

An exorcism film with nothing to exorcise but your patience.

Exorcism horror is a subgenre rich with potential—questions of faith, frailty, and fear, all wrapped in layers of the unknown. Unfortunately, Shadow of God, the latest Shudder original, squanders that potential with glacial pacing, overwrought storytelling, and bargain-bin visual effects that break whatever immersion its lofty premise tries to build.

The film follows Father Mason Harper (Mark O’Brien), a Vatican exorcist drawn back to his hometown after a mysterious string of clergy deaths. What should be a chilling homecoming quickly devolves into a murky theological slog, especially when Mason’s long-thought-dead father, Angus (Shaun Johnston), reemerges—changed, and possibly possessed… not by the devil, but something supposedly divine. It’s a neat inversion on paper, but in execution, it’s all empty sermon and no soul.

Director Michael Peterson leans heavily into a tone of self-importance, mistaking laborious dialogue for depth. The film drowns in exposition and symbolism so on-the-nose it feels like you’re being bludgeoned by scripture. What could have been a taut, unsettling exploration of corrupted holiness instead becomes an exercise in patience.

Worse still are the effects. When Shadow of God tries to finally erupt into spectacle—visions, possessions, biblical cataclysm—it falters hard. Cheap CGI and awkward choreography undercut whatever tension might’ve remained, ejecting the viewer from the already tenuous atmosphere. It doesn’t help that the performances, while earnest, are often lost in the noise of a bloated script and uncertain direction.

Mark O’Brien does what he can with a lead role that demands more whispery brooding than range, while Shaun Johnston’s Angus never fully sells the “divine possession” angle. Jacqueline Byers, so compelling in Prey for the Devil, is underused here. And while the supporting cast (Josh Cruddas, Adrian Hough, David Haysom) put in respectable work, they’re ultimately swallowed by the film’s somber, meandering tone.

The Prognosis:

Shadow of God wants to wrestle with grand themes—faith, legacy, divine intervention—but the execution is so leaden and clunky that it all feels like a sermon no one asked to hear. Instead of soul-searching, we get soul-sapping.

  • Saul Muerte

Grafted (2025) review: A Haunting Exploration of Beauty and Identity

08 Tuesday Apr 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

body horror, sasha rainbow

Sasha Rainbow’s Grafted is an unsettling body horror film that blends themes of identity, beauty standards, and cultural pressure with grotesque yet effective visuals. The film explores the psychological and physical toll of striving for perfection, offering an eerie commentary on how far one might go to fit in.

The story unfolds at a deliberate pace, which can feel sluggish at times, making it difficult to fully connect with the protagonist’s journey. However, the film’s strong pulse comes from its commitment to disturbing imagery and practical effects, which elevate the horror elements. The lead performance is commendable, portraying both vulnerability and a creeping sense of detachment as the character undergoes a grotesque transformation.

Visually, Grafted is striking, utilising cold, sterile environments that contrast with the organic and unsettling nature of the body horror sequences. The cinematography and lighting work to create an almost dreamlike quality, amplifying the protagonist’s descent into obsession. However, the screenplay struggles to maintain a gripping narrative, often losing momentum in its quieter moments.

Despite its flaws, Grafted offers enough unsettling moments to leave an impression. Fans of slow-burning horror with a focus on psychological and body horror will find much to appreciate, even if the film doesn’t fully capitalise on its intriguing premise.

The Prognosis:

A visually striking yet sluggish horror film that explores beauty and obsession through an unsettling lens. While Grafted may not resonate with all audiences, its strong effects and eerie atmosphere make it worth a watch for genre enthusiasts.

  • Saul Muerte

Dead Sea (2025) Review – A Tense Maritime Thriller That Treads Familiar Waters

07 Monday Apr 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

alexander wraith, eagle entertainment, Eagle Entertainment Australia, isabel gravitt, phil volken

Phil Volken’s Dead Sea takes the tried-and-true formula of oceanic survival horror and blends it with a grim and unsettling reality of human trafficking. While the film doesn’t reinvent the genre, it provides a tense and serviceable thriller that delivers a slow-building dread, punctuated by moments of sheer brutality.

The performances elevate the film above its straight-to-home-entertainment origins. Kaya, played with conviction by Isabel Gravitt, anchors the film with a blend of vulnerability and resilience. The dynamic between the three stranded friends feels natural, making their plight all the more gripping. The real standout, however, is the ship’s captain, Ray (Alexander Wraith)—portrayed with an eerie mix of menace and charm, making him a truly detestable villain.

Despite its strengths, Dead Sea treads a somewhat predictable path. The film borrows heavily from survival horror tropes, and seasoned viewers will see many of the twists coming. While the tension remains effective, the screenplay doesn’t fully capitalise on the psychological terror that could have been explored in such a confined setting. The cinematography, though competent, lacks the stylistic flair that could have made the film visually more memorable.

That said, Dead Sea still delivers enough suspense to keep audiences engaged. The film does well to maintain a sense of claustrophobic dread aboard the trawler, and when the violence erupts, it doesn’t hold back. The film’s commentary on human trafficking and black-market organ trade adds an extra layer of horror, making it more unsettling than your average lost-at-sea thriller.

For fans of survival horror and maritime thrillers, Dead Sea offers a solid—if not groundbreaking—entry into the genre. It’s a film that will keep you engaged but likely won’t linger in your mind.

The Prognosis:

A solid effort in the home entertainment space, Dead Sea delivers competent performances and steady tension but ultimately follows a familiar course without breaking new ground.

  • Saul Muerte

Available to rent or buy on Digital at Apple TV, Prime Video, Google TV, YouTube, and Fetch (AU). Own it on DVD at JB Hi-Fi and Sanity from April 9th.

Late Night Trains (1975) – A Familiar Journey into Unrelenting Terror

07 Monday Apr 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

aldo lado, ennio morricone

Aldo Lado’s Late Night Trains (L’ultimo treno della notte, 1975) arrived at the height of Italy’s exploitation boom, a time when filmmakers weren’t shy about pushing boundaries. A clear product of the era’s fascination with transgressive horror, the film wears its influences on its sleeve—most notably Wes Craven’s The Last House on the Left (1972). While it doesn’t reinvent the formula, Late Night Trains still manages to carve out its own identity, delivering a nihilistic nightmare that lingers in the mind, even as it struggles to justify its existence beyond sheer brutality.

The setup is all too familiar: Two young women, Margaret and Lisa, board a train home for Christmas, unaware that their holiday journey will become a waking nightmare. As the train moves through the cold European night, they fall prey to two sadistic criminals and a demented woman who seems to relish the violence as much as they do. The film unfolds as an exercise in cruelty, culminating in the expected revenge-fueled third act.

Lado’s direction is both slick and suffocating, using the cramped confines of the train to heighten the claustrophobia. Unlike Craven’s grimy, almost documentary-like approach, Late Night Trains boasts a more polished aesthetic, with an unsettling score by Ennio Morricone that contrasts its horrors with an eerie, melancholic beauty. This visual and auditory elegance makes the film’s brutality hit even harder, though it never quite transcends its exploitation roots.

Where Late Night Trains stumbles is in its lack of depth. While The Last House on the Left (for all its flaws) attempted to grapple with themes of cyclical violence and societal decay, Lado’s film largely exists to shock. The social commentary feels tacked on rather than fully explored, and the violence, while effectively harrowing, leaves little room for nuance. Still, as a piece of grindhouse cinema, it succeeds in delivering an experience that’s undeniably disturbing.

Fifty years later, Late Night Trains remains a controversial and haunting film, albeit one that struggles to differentiate itself from the many Last House imitators of the era. It’s a rough watch—not just for its unrelenting cruelty but for its sense of inevitability. There’s no escape here, just an unrelenting descent into torment. While not a masterpiece of the genre, its cold, methodical savagery ensures that once seen, it’s not easily forgotten.

  • Saul Muerte
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016

Categories

  • A Night of Horror Film Festival
  • Alien franchise
  • Alliance Francaise French Film Festival
  • Australian Horror
  • Best Movies and Shows
  • Competition
  • dark nights film fest
  • episode review
  • Flashback Fridays
  • Friday the 13th Franchise
  • Full Moon Sessions
  • Halloween franchise
  • In Memorium
  • Interview
  • japanese film festival
  • John Carpenter
  • killer pigs
  • midwest weirdfest
  • MidWest WierdFest
  • MonsterFest
  • movie article
  • movie of the week
  • Movie review
  • New Trailer
  • News article
  • podcast episode
  • podcast review
  • press release
  • retrospective
  • Rialto Distribution
  • Ring Franchise
  • series review
  • Spanish horror
  • sydney film festival
  • Sydney Underground Film Festival
  • The Blair Witch Franchise
  • the conjuring franchise
  • The Exorcist
  • The Howling franchise
  • Top 10 list
  • Top 12 List
  • Trash Night Tuesdays on Tubi
  • umbrella entertainment
  • Uncategorized
  • Universal Horror
  • Wes Craven
  • wes craven's the scream years

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Surgeons of Horror
    • Join 228 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Surgeons of Horror
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar