Tag Archives: Dracula

Drained of Dread: Abraham’s Boys Offers a Tepid Take on the Van Helsing Curse

05 Wednesday Nov 2025

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Joe Hill’s short story Abraham’s Boys offered a quietly haunting coda to the Dracula mythos — a modern Gothic in miniature, soaked in melancholy and generational trauma. Unfortunately, this Shudder-exclusive adaptation struggles to translate that restrained power to the screen. What emerges is a film that mistakes heavy exposition for emotional weight and loses the eerie ambiguity that made Hill’s prose hang in the air.

Set in the American Midwest, the film imagines Abraham Van Helsing as a broken patriarch trying to protect his sons, Max and Rudy, from the supernatural horrors he once fought. It’s a bold premise — relocating Stoker’s world from the fog of Europe to the dust and decay of small-town America — but in doing so, the film sheds the very atmosphere that defined the Gothic. The Midwest may hold its ghosts, but here it feels oddly sterile, a backdrop devoid of menace or mystique.

Even more jarring is the notion that Van Helsing, once defined by faith and obsession, would settle down with Mina Harker and start a family. The choice feels not only implausible but thematically tone-deaf, undercutting the tragic consequences of their shared history. The result is a domestic melodrama stitched awkwardly to a monster myth that deserved grander treatment.

There are flashes of something worthwhile — the strained father-son dynamic occasionally hints at the emotional brutality Hill conjured in his story, and the film’s final moments attempt to reclaim some of its literary melancholy. But it’s too little, too late. Abraham’s Boys: A Dracula Story is a gothic without a heart, a reimagining that leaves both the horror and the humanity of its lineage drained.

The Prognosis:

A well-intentioned expansion of Joe Hill’s world that fails to capture his haunting tone or Stoker’s legacy. The bloodline runs thin.

  • Saul Muerte

Abraham’s Boys: A Dracula Story will be streaming on Shudder from Thurs 6th Nov.

The Dhampir Rises Again: 40 Years of Vampire Hunter D’s Haunting Influence

28 Wednesday May 2025

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

Premiering Exclusively on Shudder, AMC+ and HIDIVE – Friday 30 May
“In a world ruled by vampires, only a half-blood dares to hunt them.”

When Vampire Hunter D premiered in 1985, few could have predicted the cultural ripple effect it would have across manga, anime, and horror for decades to come. Now, forty years later, this gothic, genre-defying milestone returns with a long-awaited streaming premiere on Shudder, AMC+, and HIDIVE—offering a perfect moment to reflect on its enduring power.

Set in the far-flung future of 12,090 A.D., the film unfolds in a post-apocalyptic landscape where science and sorcery coexist, and humanity lives in fear under the rule of the vampire Nobility. At its centre is Doris Lang, a brave young woman marked for unholy matrimony by the ancient Count Magnus Lee. Her only hope lies in the hands of a mysterious wanderer known only as D—an enigmatic vampire hunter with a tragic secret etched into his very bloodline.

Directed by Toyoo Ashida and based on the novel by Hideyuki Kikuchi with iconic illustrations by Yoshitaka Amano, Vampire Hunter D was a revelation for its time. It merged the aesthetics of Western horror—Dracula, Frankenstein, Lovecraft—with a distinctly Japanese post-apocalyptic flair, opening a door to global audiences that had rarely encountered horror anime in this form. The film’s blend of violence, melancholy, and romanticism felt alien and refreshing—an animated Gothic western that flirted with sci-fi, body horror, and dark fantasy.

The horror in Vampire Hunter D is not just visual—it’s atmospheric. Shadowy castles, mutated creatures, and the decaying elegance of the vampire Nobility all serve to create an air of terminal beauty, where death and corruption linger in every frame. The film pulses with dread, not just from its antagonists, but from the melancholic burden D carries as a dhampir—caught between two worlds, never at home in either.

Manga, and later anime, would absorb and amplify these motifs. Vampire Hunter D helped normalise horror as a serious mode within manga storytelling, inspiring a lineage that includes Berserk, Hellsing, Claymore, and Attack on Titan. Its DNA can be traced through the decades, proving that gothic horror, when stylised with poetic nihilism and speculative world-building, could resonate far beyond Japan.

Though animation has since evolved in leaps and bounds, there’s a charm in Vampire Hunter D’s hand-drawn grit—a visual texture that feels inseparable from its era and identity. It may lack the polish of modern anime, but it makes up for it in atmosphere, tone, and mythic presence.

The Prognosis:

As it celebrates its 40th anniversary with a new generation of fans ready to rediscover it, Vampire Hunter D still holds its scythe high. Part horror, part tragedy, and wholly influential, it remains a cornerstone of horror anime—and proof that even in a world of monsters, the greatest fear often lies within the hero himself.

  • Retrospective Review by Saul Muerte

Vampire Hunter D premieres exclusively on Shudder, AMC+ and HIDIVE – Friday 30 May

Dracula Has Risen from the Grave (1968) – A Gothic Sequel with B-Movie Charm

08 Saturday Mar 2025

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

By 1968, Hammer Films had firmly established itself as the home of Gothic horror, and Dracula Has Risen from the Grave arrived as another entry in the studio’s blood-soaked saga. Directed by acclaimed cinematographer-turned-director Freddie Francis, the film saw Christopher Lee return as the Prince of Darkness in a stylish, if somewhat uneven, sequel.

At its core, Dracula Has Risen from the Grave weaves in themes of religion, revenge, and the ever-present battle between good and evil. Religion is front and centre, with the story emphasising Christianity’s role in morality, yet its presentation often borders on heavy-handed. Dracula’s revenge plot—a vendetta against a Monsignor who has attempted to bar him from his castle—feels petty, making the stakes seem less dire than in previous installments. There’s also an undercurrent of atheism versus faith, represented through the character of Paul (Barry Andrews), a young man forced to confront the supernatural despite his disbelief.

The film’s Gothic atmosphere is undeniably one of its strengths. Francis’ eye for striking visuals ensures that the production is filled with rich, saturated colours and ornate imagery, making for some truly memorable sequences. However, the narrative itself is more loosely structured than its predecessors, favouring style over substance. While some fans appreciate its looser, almost dreamlike quality, others find it lacking the tight plotting that made earlier Hammer Draculas more engaging.

As always, Christopher Lee dominates every scene he’s in, exuding menace with his piercing gaze and towering presence. Unfortunately, his Dracula is given little to do beyond the usual bloodletting and brooding stares. Still, his performance alone elevates the material.

While Dracula Has Risen from the Grave is a fun Hammer entry with B-movie charm, it doesn’t quite hold up to its predecessors in terms of narrative weight. It’s reactionary in its simplistic framing of good versus evil, yet it delivers enough Gothic atmosphere and unique set pieces to be enjoyable. Ultimately, it’s a solid but unremarkable addition to Hammer’s Dracula series.

The Prognosis:

A beautifully shot but narratively thin sequel, Dracula Has Risen from the Grave is worth watching for its Gothic aesthetic and Christopher Lee’s performance. However, its weaker plot and lack of high stakes keep it from being one of Hammer’s best.

  • Saul Muerte

Blood of the Virgins: A Lustful Bite of 60s Horror That Misses the Mark

14 Thursday Nov 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

Blood of the Virgins (1967) is an interesting attempt at vampire horror that stumbles through its narrative despite its atmospheric promise. Directed by Emilio Vieyra, the film tries to capitalise on the familiar gothic elements of betrayal, seduction, and the eternal curse of vampirism, but its low budget and muddled storytelling prevent it from fully sinking its teeth into viewers.

The film opens with Ofelia, who’s set to marry Eduardo but finds herself in a tangled web with her lover Gustavo. Despite some pre-wedding jitters, Ofelia goes through with the marriage, only for Gustavo to interrupt their wedding night with murder and a fateful bite, turning her into a vampire. Fast-forward to the 1960s, where a group of travellers takes refuge in a deserted lodge after their van breaks down. Ofelia reappears, now a tragic figure caught between the pull of seduction and her growing weariness with the vampire’s curse.

While the setup is promising and echoes classic vampire tales, Blood of the Virgins falters in its execution. The transition from Ofelia’s tragedy to the modern-day storyline is rough, leaving viewers with little investment in the new characters. The young travellers quickly fall into horror stereotypes, and their interactions feel shallow, making it hard to care about their fates as they encounter Ofelia. The central mystery surrounding the vampire’s motives and how the group will survive unfolds predictably, with suspense largely absent and horror scenes lacking bite.

Visually, Blood of the Virgins does manage to capture some atmospheric shots with moody lighting and a dreamy, surreal quality. However, it doesn’t do enough to maintain tension or provide any significant scares. Vieyra’s direction seems uncertain, as if torn between crafting a horror film and leaning into the film’s more exploitative elements. The horror never reaches the eerie or unsettling, instead landing in a kind of melodrama that drags down the pacing.

Ofelia, the story’s would-be tragic heroine, lacks the depth that might make her journey compelling. Her transformation and internal conflict about her cursed life could have added emotional weight, but they’re skimmed over in favour of a few romanticised seduction scenes that lack nuance. The attempt at sensual horror falls flat, feeling more like an obligatory nod to the eroticism associated with vampire lore than an organic part of the story.

While Blood of the Virgins holds some intrigue as a piece of Argentinian horror cinema from the 1960s, it ultimately fails to deliver as either a compelling vampire story or an effective horror film. It’s an uneven experience best suited for those curious about vintage Latin American genre cinema, but for most viewers, it’s likely to feel like a missed opportunity. Vieyra’s vision doesn’t quite come together here, leaving Blood of the Virgins feeling more like a hazy, half-formed nightmare than a film that truly haunts.

  • Saul Muerte

Dracula: Prince of Darkness (1966): Reviving a Legend

09 Wednesday Oct 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

, , , ,

Dracula: Prince of Darkness marked Hammer’s triumphant return to its most iconic villain—Dracula. After an eight-year hiatus, the gothic lord of the undead was brought back to life by Christopher Lee in a film that leaned heavily on mood, atmosphere, and terror, despite Lee’s notable absence of dialogue throughout the film. Directed by Terence Fisher, this third entry in Hammer’s Dracula series was a definitive moment for Hammer, reaffirming their dominance in gothic horror.

Christopher Lee, now an international horror icon, reprises his role as the infamous Count with effortless menace. While Dracula’s silence in the film has drawn some criticism, this choice imbues the character with a primal, almost animalistic aura. Stripping Dracula of speech makes his presence all the more haunting, amplifying the tension whenever he appears on screen. It’s a testament to Lee’s performance that even without dialogue, Dracula’s terror is palpable.

The film’s plot follows four travelers who unknowingly awaken Dracula from his death-like slumber after taking refuge in his abandoned castle. The narrative may be simple, but it serves as the perfect vehicle for the film’s true strength: its atmosphere. From the moment the travellers enter Dracula’s castle, the audience is immersed in a world of gothic dread. The sprawling, decaying castle, the candlelit corridors, and the mist-shrouded landscapes create an eerie, foreboding mood that is quintessentially Hammer.

Visually, Dracula: Prince of Darkness is a stunning achievement. Hammer’s mastery of gothic aesthetics is on full display, with vibrant color contrasts—particularly the deep reds of blood—against shadowy backdrops. Every frame is designed to heighten the sense of terror and isolation, pulling viewers deeper into Dracula’s dark domain. Terence Fisher’s direction ensures that the tension builds gradually, with a creeping sense of inevitability as Dracula’s resurrection draws near.

While the film may not break new ground in terms of plot, it delivers everything that fans of Hammer horror crave: suspenseful pacing, terrifying villains, and a heavy dose of gothic style. Lee’s performance, though wordless, conveys pure menace, and the supporting cast adds enough personality to keep the story engaging.

As the flagship film in Hammer’s 1966 lineup, Dracula: Prince of Darkness set the tone for what would be a banner year for the studio. It’s not a reinvention of the vampire mythos, but rather a confident refinement of everything Hammer had mastered up until that point. This return to Dracula not only revitalised Hammer’s most beloved franchise but also proved that, when it came to gothic horror, Hammer was still the undisputed leader.

  • Saul Muerte
1966: The Year Hammer Owned Horror

Movie review: Dracula: Voyage of the Demeter

10 Thursday Aug 2023

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

Sandwiched between the opening act of Bram Stoker’s Dracula where Jonathan Harker is imprisoned by the titular dark lord, and the events that unfold in London, there is a chapter centred on the transportation of the Count across the seas to Whitby. For four pages we read the account of this perilous trip courtesy of the captains’ log on the ship The Demeter.

For such a small amount in the novel, the diarised account would have a profound impact on the reader as the crew are picked off one by one before the ship finally reaches its destination, so it’s little wonder that it would draw inspiration in the celluloid artform. The concept holds a lot of promise, with the original narrative detailing a treacherous voyage with a crew of nine sailors, all prey for the beast that has boarded the ship. One can imagine a similar telling to Alien, where a confined space where there is nowhere to run other than to confront the demon can elevate the fears, driving a wedge between sanity and madness, thrusting the crew to fall deeply into the latter.

And so we embark on Director André Øvredal’s vision of this tale, who is no stranger to paranormal and twisted stories in a remote setting as The Autopsy of Jane Doe can attest to. Boasting a strong cast at its helm, leading with Corey Hawkins (Straight Outta Compton) as the trained doctor Clemens, marred in society because of the colour of his skin, bargaining his way on board the ship for the chance to return to his homeland; There’s Liam Cunningham (Game of Thrones) as the stoic captain; David Dastmalchian (The Boston Strangler) as the loyal-yet-disbelieving first mate, Wojchek; Jon Jon Briones (Ratched) as the cook and religious zealot; and Aisling Franciosi (The Nightingale) as the stowaway Anna, who has an intricate connection to the predator. But it is Woody Norman as the young cabin boy Toby who pivots the heart of the story and portrays a captivating character that belies his years.

As for the titular villain of the piece… his presence is always felt throughout the film but his impact is not as telling, nor confronting as one would have hoped for, despite some decent effects.

The Prognosis:

There is plenty of intrigue from a fairly untapped segment in one of Gothic literature’s finest tales, one that would pull me into the arena with willing anticipation. Yet, for all the talent on screen, there is surprisingly little in the way of building up the ambience and dread from someone as fearful as Dracula. So focused are the writers in embellishing the plot with background and character development, (some with the licence that creatives can afford to keep the audience captivated) that they neglect to draw out the fear and trepidation that the Prince of Darkness deserves. While the journey is still an enjoyable one, the course is easily traversed and never delves into the realms of immorality in order to stir the senses, or shake you to the core.

  • Saul Muerte

Dracula: Voyage of the Demeter is currently screening in cinemas nationwide.

Movie review: Renfield (2023)

27 Saturday May 2023

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , ,

It is clear when watching Renfield that Director Chris McKay has channelled his comedic knowledge working on Robot Chicken and The Lego Batman movie to produce a film gilled with high energy and tongue firmly planted in cheek.  This in part is due to Robert Kirkman’s (The Walking Dead) pitch following Universal Dark Universe reboot, but box office failure of The Mummy.

Using Bram Stoker’s Dracula as source material novel, the film centres on one of the price of darkness’ familiars, RM Renfield to build a modern setting upon. In the novel itself, Renfield is an important-yet-minor character in the grand scheme of things, but is ripe for exploration into a contemporary perspective.

Set in modern times, our protagonist played by Nicholas Hoult (Warm Bodies) finds himself drained by the everyday/night demands by his master to sustain the food supply and keep his power and strength to its fullest.

Renfield then takes himself to a voluntary self help group of people in codependent relationship with the plan to rid his peers from those who’ve been wronged and bring their abusive partners before Dracula.

A worthwhile plan that rewards his nobleness that is until he meets and falls for police officer Rebecca Quincy (Akwafina). Rebecca is also hellbent on proving her worth in the police community, striding to climb out of the shadows of her father and sister. It is here that thus unlikely duo team up against the forces of evil and stand up to their domineering counterparts.

The Prognosis:

All eyes will no doubt focus on Nicolas Cage’s portrayal of Dracula, which is suitably amped up to the nth degree and with plenty of nods towards Max Shreck and Bela Lugosi incarnations. Cage tips it onto the right side of camp without taking it too much into the extreme.

Nicholas Hoult also taps into bumbling Britism to bring a modern Renfield to the screen and when combined with Akwasfina’s dry wit, a fun, comic journey unfolds between them.

The action sequences are also gory and packed with humour, and decide a fairly mediocre storyline, the afore-mention3d elements allow for a decent flick that does just enough to entertain without being clouded by ridicule

– Saul Muerte

Renfield is currently screening in cinemas nationwide.

Retrospective: Dracula (1958)

06 Sunday Nov 2022

Posted by in retrospective

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

It’s 1958 and Hammer Films has slowly been making its mark on the horror celluloid scene, but they are about to cement their place forever with their iconic take on Bram Stoker’s Dracula as part of a deal between Seven Arts and Universal International. Iconic in that they would produce one of the most infamous images of the titular character thanks to the commanding presence of Christopher Lee. It would also see Lee don the fangs a total of seven times for Hammer, the last being The Satanic Rites of Dracula in 1973. His blood red eyes and performance as a sexual predator would set the image of modern Dracula up for life, but it would also be one that would irk Lee over time, becoming tiresome of the watered down versions he would ultimately play.

To add weight to the original feature (entitled The Horror of Dracula in the US as Universal wanted to distinguish the British version from their own 1931 feature starring Bela Lugosi), Hammer would cast Peter Cushing to play Dracula’s foe Van Helsing. A worthy and notable performance once again which would see Cushing insisting on performing his own stunts throughout.

It would once again herald Jimmy Sangster on writing duties, and the ever-dependable Terence Fisher in the directors chair following his success with The Curse of Frankenstein.

Upon review, the film still holds up well with solid performances throughout and the sexual undertone lays heavy with palettes of red, producing some well-handled effects. It’s also of note, the omission of key character Renfield from the novel, and the amalgamation of Jonathan Harker (John Van Eyssen) and Arthur Holmwood’s (Michael Gough) role in the storyline too.  

Upon release, the film did well despite heavy criticism from certain avenues of the media, dubbing the X certificate a pale option and cries for a new classification to be ordered. Either way it didn’t stop the punters from going to see it, and paved the bloody path for Hammer to walk along for another two decades.

– Saul Muerte

Movie review: The Invitation (2022)

07 Wednesday Sep 2022

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , ,

The lure of Dracula entices moviegoers to the cineplex once more with this latest adaptation of Bram Stoker’s tale. This time the setting has a modern approach with the idea that the notorious nosferatu has been living all this time and set up his abode in new Carfax Abbey.
The wheels that turn in order to pull us into the narrative are a little slow and cumbersome, placing our focus on orphan,  Evie Jackson (Nathalie Emmanuel) who resides in New York, struggling to make ends meet in the catering business, when she receives the result of a DNA test through a new software programme. This leads to a connection with an estranged cousin and his family who live in England, and the promise of another life with wealth and romance to entice her further into their world. So Evie and her streetwise ways land her in prominent society into the path of Walter De Ville (Thomas Doherty), the charismatic lord of the manor. Behind the visage though is something more sinister with old world rules at play.

Australian director, Jessica M. Thompson does well to craft this new vision of an age-old Gothic tale for her sophomore feature length outing, but it has to be said that the writing is clumsy and falls prey to cliches all too often. There are bold attempts at providing this fresh spin, but in doing so, there are choices made that leave one groaning in response. Perhaps I am showing my age, but The Invitation succumbs to modern trappings, where some of the details and depth are glossed over for the sake of image, but this comes at the destruction of the story’s essence. As such, one is more likely to fall into a sense of lull as we are guided through each of the steps towards the film’s climax.

The ending even feels a little mismatched too, as if trying to force a potential franchise out of this. The way it is handled makes no sense whatsoever. If it were not for Emmanuel’s performance, who is once again showing that she is a force to reckon with on screen and more than deserves the lead status here, this film would be positively dormant with no hope of resurrection throughout. 

The Prognosis:

The Invitation is a bold attempt at reinventing an old tale for a modern audience. Its delivery however leaves you wanting, missing the mark on numerous occasions. Nathalie Emmmanuel shines in an otherwise lacklustre narrative that rests too easily on its laurels, failing to drive the direction into a riveting new place.

  • Saul Muerte

Retrospective: House of Dracula (1945)

07 Monday Dec 2020

Posted by in retrospective, Universal Horror

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

Celebrating its 75th anniversary this year is Universal’s second Monster mash up, House of Dracula, and being one of the last movies to feature these iconic creatures also indicated that the times were changing and a new shift in horror was about to occur.

Treated as a direct sequel to House of Frankenstein, this feature would once again Count Dracula, The Wolf Man, Frankenstein’s Monster, and a mad scientist together.

This time though, it is the Count (once again played by John Carradine) that seeks a cure for his vampirism. Although there are questions around the legitimacy of his intentions as he seems to still go about his day (or should I say night?) without a care. This in complete contrast to the doomed and tragic figure, Larry Talbot (Lon Chaney Jr reprising his role once more). Dracula approaches Dr. Edelmann (Onslow Stevens) to aid him in his quest for a cure, who believes he can do so using a mysterious plant that can reshape bone. It is Dr. Edelman’s belief that using a series of blood transfusions, he can assist Dracula.

It is at this point that Larry Talbot enters the scene, also hoping that the Doctor can help him. Dr. Edelmann however is too consumed with the Count and so Talbot gets himself incarcerated by the police for fear that he will turn into a wolf and kill again. Whilst imprisoned, Inspector Holtz (Lionel Atwill in one of his last film roles) and Dr. Edelmann witnesses the transformation, with the latter now convinced, and promises he will try to find a cure.

Larry Talbot continues to be one of the most fascinating characters in the Universal Monster franchise, with his inner conflict and turmoil, the characteristics that Chaney Jr played so well. Here Talbot is driven to suicide, throwing himself off the cliff into the waters below, only to survive the ordeal. Dr. Edelmann finds Talbot in the caves beneath the castle and in doing so stumbles across Frankenstein’s monster (Glenn Strange) still clutching the skeletal remains of Dr. Neimann from the previous movie. Edelmann takes the monster back to his castle but swears not to revive him for fear that it will only cause ruin.

Through all these distractions, the Count has been using his charms on the Doctor’s assistant Milizia (Martha O’Driscoll) but is prevented by the good old cross. The Doctor’s other assistant, Nina, (Jane Adams) a hunchback, witnesses the Count’s attempts and notices the absence of his reflection. Time for another blood transfusion, only Dracula turns the tables, hypnotising Nina and Edelman and then reversing the transfusion, so that Edelmann is given the vampiric blood. 

This action proves to be the Count’s downfall however as Edelmann exposes Dracula’s coffin to sunlight, killing him. This is just beyond the half an hour mark leaving the question again as to the true danger that Dracula exhibits when he doesn’t last the entire feature.

With the Wolf Man being treated and the Dracula out for the… count (ahem), this leaves a hole for a villain to fill. In steps a transformed Edelmann, struggling with the vampiric blood in his system that sends him crazy and a climax that brings about the rise of Frankenstein’s creature, a horde of angry villagers, and only a cured Talbot to bring down the house.

House of Dracula serves up a much neater storyline compared with its predecessor, House of Frankenstein, and the performances are strong. It still struggles to incorporate all the different aspects, but considering it’s short running time of just over the hour mark, there’s enough packed in to entertain, and ultimately became a commercial success as a result.

  • Saul Muerte