Creature features are always a bold enterprise to undertake; reveal the beast to soon and you lose all suspension of disbelief; bring the creature into the fold too late, you may lose the interest of the viewer; and if once it is revealed, the monster has to satiate one’s desires or lose impact entirely. Thankfully writer, director Scott Walker (The Frozen Ground) is in good hands for his sophomore feature length outing, teaming up with Weta Workshop to bring the wretches to life on the screen.
To harness his vision, Walker fuels the narrative with a small family unit, thrust into the wilderness against a dark presence to tie our interests and connect with them in their plight.
When we meet the trio of father, Ben (Matt Whelan – Narcos); mother, Jules (Lucianne Buchanan – The Night Agent); and daughter Reia (Zara Nausbaum) they are fighting to make ends meet in a rundown pet store, when they inherit an abandoned coastal property with its own secluded beachfront. What seems like an opportunity to reap from their new abode, the family look to fix it up and sell for a tidy profit, but there is something sinister lurking beneath them. As Ben sets to work repairing the water tank that is tied to the property and reconnecting the fresh water supply, Jules begins to unearth a disturbing past that is tied to the house and Ben’s family. What lies dormant, finds new life and begins to rise to the surface, stalking and laying claim to its territory.
As Walker carves out a fairly satisfactory tale, building up atmosphere and introducing neighbouring characters that can be suitably killed off by the wee beastie, he also chooses the approach of saving the creature reveal until the characters on screen have time to be established. The indicators set up to the final climax are a little easy to spot however, including initiating Jules’ own strength and resilience earlier on when we witness her capturing a pet rat in the afore-mentioned pet store. Sure she can handle herself against smaller creatures but how will she fare when she comes face to face with a far greater foe?
The Prognosis:
There is plenty to draw you in on the surface value, with strong performances, beautiful scenery, and decent creature effects, and the story weaves an ecological moral with greater depth than The Black Demon deigned to inflict upon us. The execution however, stays a little too close to predictability with some of the plot choices. It’s engaging enough however and sits nicely in the middle of the road. playing it safely, placing the family under threat, despite not offering anything new.
Alice Maio Mscksy is fast making conversation with her much needed voice for the transgender community. Where she made a significant impact with her low budget directorial feature debut, So Vam, Mackay has evidently built on her learning to tackle her next outing, Bad Girl Boogey with a lot more swagger, and a tightly knit package from which to orchestrate her vision. There is still some edge to her guerilla style shooting tactics though to ground the supernatural narrative into a believable world, as she weaves a topical and relevant dialogue with characters that ooze raw appeal.
Using the slasher genre as her playing field, Mackay is able to cut to the bone on a subject that seems close to the heart; one of oppression and ostracisation. Where So Vam focused on the victimisation of drag queen culture through vampiric lore, Bad Girl Boogey opens up the vein of societies’ so-called misfits to expose the dark side that all of humanity is vulnerable to. In fact, the facade that is placed on the characters and us voyeurs to the ordeal, make us all subjectable to the atrocities when we are left to feed on these human deficiencies while it is left to fester. We have masks that we wear, to try and conform to society, but if we rely on hiding behind them and not facing up to what it means to have empathy and understanding of our fellow People, then we’ll be forever doomed as a society.
As we follow our lead protagonist, Angel (Lisa Fanto) following her own traumatic experience in the wake of losing her mother from a brutal murder. The trauma that Angel carries with her is still crude in its healing, and has left her drifting through life. It also leads her on the path of a deranged killer, who wears a parasitic mask, fuelled by dark magic to curse anyone who should wear it. If this isn’t a metaphor for Mackay’s whole agenda, I’m not sure what is. The audience are then treated to a troubling tale that identifies us all as potential killers unless we face up to the demons of a traumatic or scarred past and deal with it head on. The darkness can shed light on our most harboured trepidations and give rise to greater fears, but in doing so fosters conversation and in some cases hope. Alice is forced to do so when her best friend is killed and is suddenly subjected to overcoming her struggles, find the killer, and stop them before all those she holds dear are left in the toils of malice.
The Prognosis:
Alice Maio Mackay’s sophomore feature is just as painful and raw as her predecessor, but armed with knowledge and a strong core message, she manages to craft a tale that resonates. The gritty and dark side of humanity is exposed behind the mask we all wear, and Mackay proves once again that she not only has a message to share, but can do so with an impact that will make you sit up and listen.
Saul Muerte
Bad Girl Boogey is currently available on DVD at Umbrella Entertainment while stocks last and will release on digital platforms July 4 and DVD release on July 11 through Dark Star Pictures.
We need a name for a genre of horror that features a supernatural Macguffin that latches itself onto someone and puts them through hell, to the – and this can’t be underlined enough – disbelief of all those around them. In these films the outcome for the lead actor (or usually actress) is that they die. Or they “beat” the phantom thing only to be taken out in the coda, because these creatures are supernatural herpes. You can put ém down, but they’ll always come back… Anyway – we can cite a number of these movies, which I’ll leave Saul Muerte to fill out…
Gee, thanks Ant, I’m guessing from your description that you’re talking about Supernatural Horrors. In which case, here’s a bunch of descent ones… (SAUL)
The Orphanage (2007)
The Innkeepers(2011)
The Babadook (2014)
Under The Shadow (2016)
His House (2020)
… but suffice to say The Boogeyman is the latest iteration. Based on the Stephen King short story of the same name, it follows the above formula to a tee, and so threatens to be a snooze fest of paint-by-numbers proportions. What it does – being an adaptation from the Master of Horror himself, and therefore makes total sense – is make it character focused. Which on paper straight away causes it to be better for the effort alone. Or it would be if it were not for a few irritating touchstone cliches that the film hits pretty hard (but more on that later). The lead is Sadie Harper (Sophie Thatcher who played the young Regan in The Exorcist TV Series) – a teenage girl whose mother was killed in a car accident a year earlier. Her father is a psychiatrist, Will (Chris Messina), who of course deals with the passing of his wife by NOT talking about it with his children, which equals cliché #1 – a psyche doc who is terrible at being a psychologist to his own family. Sadie has a younger sister – Sawyer (Viven Lyra Blair – Birdbox) – who can’t sleep at night without a nightlight (and is a bed wetter to boot) and of course is afraid of monsters lurking in her closet. (Although not enough to CLOSE the door and barricade it with a chair or anything… but kids are notorious non-planners). So what happens to these Harpers? Well, the dad gets a visit from a clearly disturbed man wanting to make a walk-in appointment – Lester Billings (David Dastmalchian – Boston Strangler) (has there EVAH been a more Stephen King sounding name than “Lester Billings”? :P). Lester tells Will his three children have died. The first from what would appear to be natural but tragic circumstance (SIDS) but the other two… not so much. So of course, all eyes are now on him ala Kathleen Folbigg (for non-Aussie readers out there, please feel free to Google) and poor Lester is at his wits end. Especially once he reveals that what he believes killed child 2 and 3 was… not of this world… Once that’s done – Lester, now that he has served his story purpose – promptly kills himself (or DID HE…..? Dun dun….blaaaaah!!!) and we are off to the races. Because of course what’s really at play here is a demon like creature that is visible only in shadow. It attacks you and makes you seem crazy as it’ll only present itself to victims it targets. After running through Lester’s kids like a laxative through a colon, it soon finds the Harpers a delicious temptation because it likes to zero in on a family struck by natural tragedy (remember the mum?) since such pain leaves them “vulnerable” (or sum such) and it wants to feed off their terror. I honestly may have zoned out at that point, ‘cause when do they don’t do that? Anyway, the stage is set, from small scares to bigger ones, as Sadie & Sawyer slowly believe the creature is real …to finding out more about it….to fighting off the scepticism of all the disbelieving side characters around them (including their dad. Natch). And of course, we get The Plan to defeat the creature, followed by the inevitable climax as we see if this film is one where the plan works, or doesn’t, or does, then doesn’t… (you know how the variables go). Sadie is ably played by Sophie Thatcher and Sawyer is excellently played by Vivien Lyra Blair. Sadie has a best friend who is a pretty poor one as she aligns herself with a clique of nasty bullies straight out of the mean-girl formula playbook, and Lester’s distraught wife provides the movie with the monster exposition scenes that tell us (in vague terms) what it is, and what can be done to kill it. Although just once it’d be nice for these sorts of films to break the format and have the demon creature do its shit in front of cops and a news crew. That way a concerted effort can be made to capture/kill it by more than a single exhausted & terrified protagonist. Mind you, in this day & age, even if the media filmed such a creature half the world would instantly brand it fake news. Maybe that’s what a really smart Boogeyman would (& should) do? Attack its victim by first confusing them, and then gaslighting them. Big time.
The Prognosis.
Starts slow. Starts cliched. Starts too hard. But you do stick around to see how it ends.
Anubys Lopez (Those Who Call) has been slowly crafting stories that unfold dark and disturbing mysteries for the low budget horror film scene. His sophomore feature, Aged, is no exception building a slow, tense thriller with a harrowing climax.
There are paranormal elements at play, constantly lurking beneath the surface of the narrative, be it spiritual or fantastical. These facets unfold with bitterness, shifting and changing the audiences’ perspective and leading us to a conclusion that poses questions around your character allegiance.
Veronica Grey (Morgan Boss-Maltais – Stray) seems to be drifting through life with no clear direction. Her name even suggests how she may have faded from her surroundings, becoming pale in contrast to what life can offer. So when she is offered a temporary job as a caregiver for the elderly Mrs. Bloom (Carla Kidd – Black Widow Murders) from her son Charles (Dave McClain – The Curse of Professor Zardonicus) she reluctantly sets off for the remote abode. When she arrives all appears well, but before too long, the nooks and crannies start to expose a sinister and supernatural force at play.
The Prognosis:
Aged drifts along at a painfully slow pace, and the quiet and solitude of the sound editing echoes with unnerving stillness at the sacrifice of the script.
The performances are solid, despite the dialogue proving weak in places, there is a powerful conclusion that sparks a strong and definitive resolution.
Saul Muerte
Aged is available on streaming platforms from June 15.
When the name Ivan Reitman is mentioned, most cinephiles will bring to mind 80’s comedy films such as Meatballs, Stripes, or Ghostbusters, all of which star the great Bill Murray with the latter two featuring Harold Ramis. In the early seventies though, for his third feature, Reitman would direct another comedy great Eugene Levy as Clifford, a travelling guitar player who runs into trouble along with his girlfriend, Gloria (Andrea Martin – another Canadian comic alumni).
It’s evident that Reitman has a dark comic vein, especially notable in Cannibal Girls, which uses a low-budget to tell a grindhouse story about a couple who unwittingly stay at a house run by a woman with an appetite for human flesh.
This feature is integral to the style and approach to Reitman’s filmography that would pave the way to iconic cinema hits. It would provide the building blocks for the film director to recognise the need for the talent to shine on screen, when their natural comic ability resonates. None more so than with Levy here, who along with his co-stars was provided the opportunity to improvise their dialogue throughout.
As the film ebbs and flows through the outer rims of morbid humour, it struggles to lift itself in places, snagged under the weight of what is essentially a simple premise. It plays some typical traits in a dream sequence and and a few twists that also includes an untrustworthy narrator in the mix. Despite some of these flaws, it is fun to see Levy with some freedom to ad-lib and for Reitman to hone his craft, for movie lovers to delve into.
I wonder if there will ever be a time when the word Nazi or its image will ever be the go-to for symbolic evil? While WWII was one of the darkest times on human history, the subject is something of a tired cliche and almost lazy int the realms of Horror.
Having said that, I like the approach that Director/writer Ted Geoghegan (We Are Still Here; Mohawk) goes for in order to twist our expectations by trapping his characters in a sealed room during a seance. Not only does this amplify the tension and play with the concept of life in the trenches, but also exposes the darkest secrets through post-war trauma at its heart.
All five characters that unite are military veterans and all have experienced the trepidation of war in their own unique way. So when one of their group, Lt. Col. Clive Hockstatter (Larry Fessenden – Depraved) invites them to his place, in the wake of his wife’s passing, the childhood friends drop it all to be with him. Little do they know that Hockstatter has plans to reunite with his love through the psychic medium of a seance. Once they have opened the portal to the other side, other forces come into play and the group are forced to expose their demons or spend their eternity in psychotic limbo. What extremes will they go to to win ther freedom and at what cost, in this microscopic scrutiny of humanity.
The feature takes some time to ramp up to the seance in question with characters that are a little hard to engage with. It feels a little forced and laboured to get to this point but once it does, the shifts and changes start to resonate and a truly harrowing ordeal lay before them. By the films’ conclusion you’re even left pondering the choices made and whether we can ever be forgiven for our sins. Is redemption possible no matter how disturbing our past actions may be?
The Prognosis:
You have to be patient with this potboiler as it can be quite easy to zone out in the first act. If you stick with it though, an entertaining period crime drama starts to sizzle with nice effects and strong performances from Anne Ramsay, Fessenden and the cast.
The Black Demon threatened to dominate the big screen cinemas with its theatrical trailer and megladon of epic proportions tied in with a family under threat vibe. The casting of Josh Lucas as its lead was also a relatively safe choice as he knows how to deliver in front of the camera. Yet the appointment of Director Adrian Grunberg was a worrying one despite being no stranger to action he clearly struggles with a decent execution if Rambo: Last Blood was anything to go by.
Oilman Paul Sturges has grand plans for an idyllic family holiday off the coast of Baja, Mexico whilst combining with a job trip to quality check an oil rig called “El Diamante’. The name given to this derrick should serve as a metaphor for the film; a facade that is all glitz and no glamour.
Likewise Sturges is not all he seems to be, harbouring a secret that has helped fuel the lifestyle that he has provided for his family.
The location itself is one that Sturges and his wife Ines (Fernanda Urrejola) hold strong memories with, having shared some quality time there, but upon arrival they find that it has been run to the ground and unsavoury characters are ruling the roost.
While the family in peril provides the bait for viewers to hook onto, the mode that we are expected to traverse soon becomes tiresome and predictable and this paint by numbers approach to the story combined with dire dialogue is tiring to watch unfold. While I applaud the idea of the local paganistic views being explored, this theme is saturated by the ecological viewpoints of the writers, who continuously ram them down our throats to the point that you wish they just take us out of our misery with a carefully triggered shot with a strategically placed scuba tank. Instead we’re subjected to painfully overplayed fodder with a mega shark that only casually graces us with an appearance when the tension needs to be mounted.
The Prognosis:
The films’ creatives need to seriously go back to the drawing board and reevaluate their storytelling methods because this film is seriously going to need a bigger plot.
The Black Demon slaps its morals and predictable narrative round the face like a… a 60ft gigantic megaladon.
Saul Muerte
The Black Demon is in cinemas from June 8th and streaming on VOD from June 21st.
Where unrest lies around remakes and sequels, there also comes the age-old response of untouched gold concerning “classic’ features that come into effect. Among them is undoubtedly Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho, based on Robert Bloch’s novel. The feature is so embedded in masterly terrain that the very notion of going near such material would be scorned upon, even Gus Van Sant’s controversial shot-for-shot remake was lambasted for daring to go into the material. So, when Bloch himself ventured with a novelised sequel back in 1982, that lambasted slasher films, Hollywood decided to strike back and carve out their own Norman Bates return some 22 years after its predecessor was released.
Psycho II would even struggle at first to entice its star Anthony Perkins to reprise the infamous role, but upon reading the script by Tom Holland, he agreed to do so. Holland himself had only been tied to screenwriting duties and would cameo as Deputy Norris here. It would only be another 3 years before Holland would capture horror enthusiasts further with his directorial role for Fright Night.
Helming the directorial duties for Psycho II would be Hitchcock student and heavily influenced by the auteur, Richard Franklin, who had already made Patrickand Roadgames using similar styles and techniques that the Master of Suspense came synonymous for. It would seem then that Franklin was the perfect choice to steer the ship and blend this continuation for the Norman Bates storyline.
Part of the appeal for this narrative would be the magnificent Vera Miles also returning for her role of Lila Loomis, although the treatment of her character arc is brought to contention which sees her on a malicious vendetta to put Bates behind bars again. Whilst you can understand her views, it is her gruesome demise that gets fans fuming a little. Personally, I like this journey and the subject of nature vs nurture that is brought to the helm. Can a man really change or is he doomed to repeat himself when constantly subjected to forced opinions and spectacle?
Throw in the mix, some great supporting roles in Meg Tilly as Mary Loomis (slightly biased opinion on my count as I adored her when I was younger… and still do), Robert Loggia as Dr. Bill Raymond to cast the psychological scrutiny, and Dennis Franz as the drunk motel caretaker.
The question remains though, is Psycho II a worthy sequel?
Well let’s look at Surgeons of Horror’s own six step criteria to place the feature under the microscope.
1, Identify the ideas, themes & executional elements that make the first film great. Or at least good. Or at least worthy of being sequelised.
The original movie was the epitome of suspense, filled with certain twists and turns in storytelling technique. It also posed an intriguing antagonist in serial killer Norman Bates and his alter ego “Mother”, that would lead some to ponder what happened to him and did he remain in the confines of a psychiatric ward?
2. Pay homage and do not violate/ignore said ideas and themes and elements.
It helps to have a visionary such as Franklin at the helm to carry out the look and feel of the original Bringing back Perkins and Miles to resurrect their character also lends weight to carry the torch, but with the worthy depth to character also forces the direction into a different stance in order to establish the narrative. There is also a lot of set design and props taken from the original that features here to recapture the look and feel.
3. Introduce new/expanded themes, ideas and elements that will NATURALLY ALIGN to your first ideas, themes & elements. (Ie: Don’t use your second movie to discredit & contradict your first).
Set 20 years later lays the grounds for further expansion by placing Bates in the position of rehabilitation. The subject matter of can a person be truly reformed when they were fundamentally unhinged is ripe to explore and Perkins does a magnificent job of placing Bates with the usual “innocent’ wonder combined with a slow descent into madness. Introducing a second generation of Loomis also explores shared trauma but under a new, more sympathetic outlook that contrasts her mother’s. Both Mary and Norman have a similarity in dominant mother’s and try to shirk their control to their own detriment. By placing the psyche under scrutiny, and twisting the perspectives of all throughout, the audience is kept guessing as to which way the knife will turn. In this respect it more than ticks the fourth rule.
4. To underline point 3 – DO NOT rehash the first film and just give people “more of the same”.
5. DO NOT-NOT rehash the first film by giving more of the same…. BUT “BIGGER”.
To support this choice of direction, the slow unravel of psychosis on our central characters and in doing so, grounding the narrative, the larger than life component that some sequels suffer under, is thankfully absent here.
And finally…
6. Be a good enough stand-alone film by itself.
Can this film truly stand alone without the impact of the first? In short, no, not without the same kind of delivery. The film does carry a narrative that is strong enough, and with the flashback placed in the prologue, enough is provided for an audience member to come in cold and still value the film by its own worth,
While it’s clear that one can’t merely replicate the quality and vision of a classic, the team behind Psycho II give a damn good crack at pushing into new terrain without scarring the original vision too greatly. For me, the film is a decent attempt at exploring Bates’ character and I am grateful that Perkins was given a fairly tight storyline and subject matter to expand and explore this character in more detail. Some forty years have passed now since its release, and looking back it’s well worth a revisit.
There is an inherent fear that we hold deeply of our fellow ‘man’ and the extremes of depravity that we go to away from the confines of urban security. It seems that the further or deeper we go into the backwoods or remote locations, the greater our fear becomes. At the turn of the seventies, now prominent film director Steven Spielberg exposed those fears in the open road, hauling ass from an unknown truck driver across the vast landscape of the US for Duel; John Boorman took the love of adventure and male bonding across the riverways into more dark terrain in Deliverance; and Terence Malik offered up a slice of teenage runaways on a killing spree in South Dakota in Badlands, but it didn’t stop on US soil. In Britain they amped up the fear of folk stories by subjecting its audience to the remote Scottish island of Summerisle in The Wicker Man; and in Australia Peter Weir was serving up some outback disturbance as political commentary for The Cars That Ate Paris. It was a growing trend that was steadily getting darker.
Arguably it was in 1974 that close scrutiny was cast on the unknown and sheltered parts of the country, and a family feasting on travellers to fuel their appetite in The Texas Chain Saw Massacre that would throw turmoil into the mix and slowly craft out the slasher sub-genre. A master of horror, Wes Craven would pick up that agitation baton and run with it for The Hills Have Eyes, casting everyday white American family against a mutant inbred family set in the heart of the Californian desert to really shake us to the core. From here on in, the audience had hillbilly horror to contend with as a new playing field for the genre.
As we etch our way into the late seventies and early 80s, the raw appeal was on show to explore through I Spit On Your Grave; Tourist Trap; and the birth of slasher itself in Friday the 13th. The eighties would then play around with this concept with similar fodder in The Burning; Don’t Go In The Woods; and Just Before Dawn. It wouldn’t be long before the subject would be made lightly and Troma Entertainment didn’t disappoint with the horror comedy, Redneck Zombies to combine this trepidation and mix it with the undead.
The nineties would prove a lonely trail until we would be taken off the road and onto an unbeaten track in 2003’s Wrong Turn, a film that has somehow spawned six follow up features. Now, this may be a contentious point but it still stands strong twenty years on to me for nostalgic purposes and no amount of tree-leaping naysayers can sway me from this opinion. And while part of my reasoning may swiftly be driven by the casting of Eliza Dushka its heroine (still a Faith fan and not in the Buffy camp), but also with a pre-Dexter Desmond Harrington and a post Clueless Jeremy Sisto in its fold. And that’s not to mention a Queens of the Stone Age track in the soundtrack to complete the auditory reckoning, and some of the team from Stan Winston studios to add the gloss and gore. Sure it’s twee horror, but it continued this trend of hillbilly horror, satiating those needs and passing on the baton again for more comedy visions in Tucker and Dale vs Evil, and full out gross horror in the remake of The Hills Have Eyes by Alexandre Aja, bringing us full circle again.
The subject is here to stay as long as our fear remains, and in a post COVID world combined with our isolated lives, surviving or not through cyber connections, surely that fear will only grow stronger and thrust us into a whole new realm of revulsion. Hopefully this will pave way for more creativity to force us on the path of destruction and desolation.
Every so often, Shudder releases a smart and provocative feature on its Exclusive and Original platform, and Influence certainly fits that bill.
Using social media influencers as the basis for contemporary horror isn’t necessarily an original format for a storyline to unfold but its the manner in which Director Kurtis David Harder and his writing partner Tesh Guttikonda weave through the psychological, thriller narrative that resonates so deeply.
We initially follow one of these social media influencers, Madison (Emily Tennant) as she struggles on a backpacking trip in Thailand. Here she meets a coil, calm and collected CW (Cassandra Naud), who despite her pleasant manner, may not as she seems to appear. In fact, the whole premise shifts and changes through perspectives and misconceptions throughout, playing with the audience viewpoint. Each character we’re introduced to have their dark traits, but then show glimpses of light too. As we then follow a murderous personality, we’re left wondering where our allegiance and loyalty should lie.
The prognosis:
There’s more than meets the eye to this mysterious thriller. Beneath the beautiful facade of the Thailand scenery and behind the exterior of the personalities we portray on the social platform is a dark and sinister tale. Cassandra Naud is particularly gripping as the mysterious CW. Surprisingly hooked me into the web of deceit.
Surgeons of Horror 