Josh Ruben’s Heart Eyes (2025) continues the director’s increasing track record of blending horror with sharp comedic sensibilities. With a strong cast featuring Olivia Hoult, Mason Gooding, Jordana Brewster, and Devon Sawa, the film injects energy into a genre that thrives on familiar tropes but struggles to fully subvert them.
The film follows two co-workers working late on Valentine’s Day who find themselves mistaken for a couple by the elusive “Heart Eyes Killer.” What should have been a routine night of overtime turns into a desperate struggle for survival as they attempt to outwit a murderer with a romantic vendetta. Ruben, alongside the influence of Christopher Landon, crafts a thrilling yet darkly comedic atmosphere, elevating the film above standard slasher fare.
One of Heart Eyes’ strongest assets is its cast. Olivia Hoult and Mason Gooding deliver an engaging dynamic, their chemistry adding an element of screwball charm reminiscent of classic comedies like His Girl Friday, which fittingly plays at the local drive-in. Jordana Brewster and Devon Sawa add gravitas, balancing the film’s mix of humour and suspense. Each actor brings a spark that keeps the film’s momentum going, even when the script leans into predictability.
When it comes to slasher sequences, Heart Eyes delivers with some truly creative and intense set pieces. Ruben ensures that the kills are visually engaging and suspensefully executed, but the film often treads a fine line between homage and predictability. While it never loses its charm, seasoned horror fans may find the plot’s trajectory a little too easy to anticipate.
The Prognosis:
Heart Eyes is a fun, well-acted, and stylish slasher that balances humour and horror with flair. The chemistry of its leads and its nods to classic cinema add a refreshing touch, but it ultimately doesn’t push the boundaries of the genre enough to be truly groundbreaking. Nevertheless, it’s a solid entry in Josh Ruben’s growing filmography and a Valentine’s Day horror treat worth watching.
The year 2000 was a transitional time for horror—Scream (1996) had revitalised the slasher genre with its meta approach, but by the turn of the millennium, the self-aware horror trend was starting to wear thin. Enter Cut, an Australian entry into the post-Scream wave that embraces the familiar tropes while injecting a uniquely local flavour. With a modest budget, a playful premise, and some surprising casting choices—including pop icon Kylie Minogue and ’80s teen queen Molly Ringwald—Cut is far from a forgotten classic, but it does offer a fun, schlocky ride for slasher fans willing to embrace its rough edges.
At its core, Cut plays with the idea of a cursed film. The story follows a group of eager film students who attempt to complete an abandoned horror movie, Hot Blooded, which was left unfinished after its director was brutally murdered on set. As the students begin filming, they quickly realise that the film itself might be haunted—and that the masked killer from Hot Blooded may be more than just a character. What starts as a low-budget student project soon becomes a real-life bloodbath.
It’s a fun concept, riffing on the idea of cursed productions and the dangers of meddling with unfinished works. However, Cut never quite manages to go beyond the surface of its premise, leaning into standard slasher formula rather than fully exploring the more interesting implications of a film-within-a-film.
One of Cut’s biggest draws is its unexpected cast. Kylie Minogue appears in a brief but memorable role as the original film’s ill-fated director, giving the film a dose of star power in its early moments. However, it’s Molly Ringwald who truly stands out, playing Vanessa Turnbill, an actress from Hot Blooded who reluctantly returns to the set decades later. Ringwald brings some much-needed charisma and experience to the film, leaning into the role of a washed-up star who’s equal parts bitter and self-aware.
While the supporting cast is mostly filled with lesser-known Australian actors, there’s a sense that everyone involved is having a good time, even when the script doesn’t quite rise to the occasion.
Director Kimble Rendall (who would later work on Bait 3D) keeps things moving at a brisk pace, making the most of the limited resources. The film’s kills are gory enough to satisfy slasher fans, and while the special effects sometimes show their budgetary constraints, they add to the film’s scrappy charm.
The masked killer, known as “Scarman,” is a solid if unremarkable addition to the slasher villain roster. His design—a grotesque, stitched-up face—has potential, but the film never quite gives him a distinct enough personality or mythology to elevate him above the typical masked killers of the era.
Looking back, Cut is an interesting relic of its time. It leans heavily on Scream-inspired self-awareness but lacks the sharp writing or wit that made its American counterparts so memorable. Instead, it works best when embraced as a low-budget, locally made slasher that delivers enough fun moments to warrant a late-night viewing.
It may not have the legacy of Wolf Creek or other standout Australian horror films, but for those looking for a lesser-known slasher with an early-2000s vibe, Cut offers a nostalgic, if slightly uneven, experience.
The Prognosis:
Flawed but fun, Cut is a slasher oddity that benefits from its unique Australian setting, some unexpected casting choices, and a decent dose of bloody mayhem. It won’t be remembered as an essential entry in the genre, but it’s an entertaining curiosity for those who enjoy their horror with a bit of low-budget charm.
A quarter of a century has passed since Pitch Black crash-landed onto screens, delivering a gripping fusion of sci-fi, action, and horror that still holds its own today. In the years since, the film has spawned sequels, a devoted fanbase, and even further cemented Vin Diesel as a genre icon. But more importantly, Pitch Black remains a testament to the power of stripped-down, high-concept storytelling—proof that a simple premise, executed with precision, can stand the test of time.
The setup is deceptively straightforward: a transport ship carrying a diverse group of passengers crash-lands on a remote planet, forcing them to rely on the one man they fear the most—Richard B. Riddick (Vin Diesel), an escaped convict with surgically enhanced night vision. But as they struggle to survive, they quickly realise that Riddick isn’t the biggest threat. When the planet is plunged into total darkness during a rare eclipse, it becomes clear that they’re not alone—deadly creatures emerge from the shadows, picking them off one by one.
Director David Twohy crafted a film that defies expectations at every turn. What could have been a forgettable Alien clone instead became an exercise in atmospheric dread and moral ambiguity, where the supposed villain may be the only one capable of ensuring survival. The script is lean, the world-building is compelling without being over-explained, and the film wastes no time in establishing the stakes.
Riddick remains one of the most compelling antiheroes of modern sci-fi. Diesel, on the verge of superstardom at the time, gives a performance that simmers with controlled intensity. His Riddick is unpredictable, calculating, and, at times, genuinely terrifying. But as the film unfolds, it becomes clear that he isn’t just a brute force—he’s a survivor, and unlike the others, he understands the harsh reality of their predicament.
This role launched a franchise, leading to The Chronicles of Riddick (2004) and Riddick (2013), with a fourth installment, Riddick: Furya, in the works. While the sequels took the character in different directions, Pitch Black remains the most effective use of Diesel’s brooding screen presence, where his menace and reluctant heroism are balanced perfectly.
Beyond Diesel, Pitch Black is elevated by its supporting cast. Radha Mitchell delivers one of her best performances as Carolyn Fry, a pilot burdened with guilt and forced into leadership. Keith David brings gravitas as Imam, a man of faith struggling to reconcile belief with brutal reality. Cole Hauser plays the ruthless mercenary Johns, whose morality is as murky as Riddick’s, and Claudia Black—before her Farscape and Stargate SG-1 fame—adds depth in a smaller role.
One of the film’s strengths is how it handles its characters: no one is truly safe, and survival isn’t guaranteed. The film embraces the cruelty of its setting, reinforcing the theme that in extreme conditions, it isn’t just the monsters that are dangerous—human nature can be just as predatory.
Cinematographer David Eggby (Mad Max) gives Pitch Black a distinctive, almost surreal visual palette. The harsh, bleached-out daylight sequences contrast beautifully with the eerie, blue-tinged darkness, immersing the audience in an alien world that feels both hostile and eerily familiar. The decision to film in the Australian outback lends an authenticity to the barren landscape, making it feel truly isolated.
The creature design remains a triumph, blending practical and CGI effects to create monstrous, bat-like predators that feel genuinely threatening. The concept of light as both salvation and a fragile barrier between life and death adds an extra layer of tension, making every flickering torch or dwindling battery a source of dread.
Despite its relatively modest budget, Pitch Black has aged remarkably well. The film’s minimalist approach means it doesn’t rely on flashy effects or convoluted lore—it’s a tightly crafted survival thriller that still delivers genuine tension.
If there’s any flaw, it’s that Pitch Black set such a high bar that the later Riddick films struggled to recapture its magic. The Chronicles of Riddick attempted to expand the mythology but lost some of the rawness that made the original so compelling. Riddick (2013) brought things back to basics, but nothing quite matched the unpredictable intensity of Pitch Black.
But 25 years on, none of that diminishes its impact. Whether you’re revisiting it or discovering it for the first time, Pitch Black remains one of the best sci-fi horror films of the 21st century—lean, mean, and never afraid of the dark.
Abel Ferrara’s The Addiction (1995) is a vampire film like no other—more existential crisis than gothic horror, more philosophical discourse than blood-drenched carnage. Shot in stark black and white, it feels like an arthouse fever dream, blending horror with academia, addiction with enlightenment. At 30 years old, the film remains a fascinating, if occasionally pretentious, exploration of power, control, and oppression, anchored by a magnetic performance from Lili Taylor.
Kathleen Conklin (Lili Taylor) is a New York philosophy student whose life takes a sinister turn after she is attacked and bitten by a mysterious woman. As she spirals into an insatiable thirst for blood, she begins to see vampirism as more than just a physical affliction—it becomes a metaphor for oppression, complicity, and the nature of evil itself. Along the way, she encounters a seasoned vampire (Christopher Walken) who warns her of the dangers of surrendering completely to her cravings. But can she resist, or is she doomed to embrace the darkness?
Ferrara, never one for convention, uses vampirism as an allegory for addiction—whether to power, drugs, or ideology. The film’s dialogue is dense with references to philosophers like Nietzsche, Sartre, and Heidegger, which can sometimes feel like a graduate-level seminar more than a horror movie. But if you can push through the intellectual posturing, The Addiction offers a compelling and, at times, harrowing dissection of human nature.
Ferrara’s New York is a city of shadows, the grainy cinematography by Ken Kelsch lending a sense of grimy realism that recalls his earlier works like Bad Lieutenant (1992). The vampires here aren’t glamorous or seductive; they are sickly, ravenous, and desperate, resembling junkies more than supernatural beings.
Lili Taylor delivers a phenomenal performance as Kathleen, bringing both fragility and ferocity to the role. Her transformation from quiet intellectual to cold predator is gradual but chilling, culminating in scenes of nihilistic bloodletting that are as horrifying as they are thought-provoking.
Christopher Walken makes a brief but unforgettable appearance as Peina, a vampire who has learned to suppress his hunger. His cryptic monologues add to the film’s philosophical underpinnings, but his performance, dripping with Walken’s signature charisma, keeps things engaging rather than didactic. The supporting cast—featuring Annabella Sciorra, Edie Falco, Paul Calderon, and a young Michael Imperioli—further enriches the film’s grim world.
Thirty years later, The Addiction remains a divisive film. Some see it as a brilliant deconstruction of horror tropes and a biting commentary on societal power structures; others find it insufferably self-indulgent. But regardless of where one stands, there’s no denying its uniqueness.
Its themes—oppression, complicity, the cycle of violence—are as relevant today as they were in 1995. The film asks difficult questions: Can we resist our darker impulses, or are we all fated to succumb? Are we victims, perpetrators, or both? In true Ferrara fashion, no easy answers are given.
While The Addiction may alienate some with its academic-heavy dialogue and overtly intellectual leanings, those willing to engage with it will find a mesmerising, deeply unsettling film. Lili Taylor’s powerhouse performance, Ferrara’s uncompromising vision, and the film’s stark aesthetic make it a fascinating entry in the vampire canon—one that still bites, 30 years later.
Scott Derrickson’s The Gorge (2025) is a film brimming with promise, a high-concept action thriller that attempts to blend existential depth with pulse-pounding survival horror. Known for his ability to balance terror and emotion (The Exorcism of Emily Rose, Sinister, Doctor Strange), Derrickson crafts an ambitious narrative, but despite its stunning visual execution and compelling leads, the film struggles to fully immerse the audience before it reaches its true stakes.
Miles Teller and Anya Taylor-Joy bring a welcome chemistry to the screen, embodying two highly trained operatives assigned to opposite sides of a seemingly insurmountable gorge. Their dynamic is at the heart of the film, offering a blend of tension and reluctant camaraderie that gradually builds into something more profound. Teller’s rugged intensity contrasts well with Taylor-Joy’s ethereal yet steely resolve, making their interactions compelling even when the story falters.
The film’s core themes—uncertainty, forced isolation, and the necessity of connection—are its most intriguing elements. The gorge itself serves as both a physical and metaphorical chasm, a representation of the vast emotional and ideological distances that separate us. Derrickson is no stranger to exploring the psychological strains of confinement and survival, and The Gorge is at its best when it leans into this existential unease. The idea that we must plunge into the abyss together to find true connection is a powerful one, but the film often stumbles in delivering this emotional payoff.
The emergence of the mysterious evil lurking below should serve as the catalyst for a gripping second half, yet the film lingers too long on its setup. While tension builds effectively, the story meanders in its attempt to establish a connection between the leads, losing narrative momentum before the stakes fully materialise. By the time the horror takes centre stage, the audience’s investment feels slightly strained, making the ultimate conflict feel less urgent than it should.
The Prognosis:
Derrickson’s visual craftsmanship and the undeniable chemistry between Teller and Taylor-Joy elevate The Gorge, making it an intriguing but flawed experience. Its themes of human connection and survival resonate, yet the film struggles under the weight of its own philosophical ambitions, delaying the inevitable descent into true terror. By the time the audience is fully engaged, it feels as though the film has only just begun to reveal its true depths. A fascinating misstep, but a misstep nonetheless.
Premiering exclusively on Shudder and AMC+, Little Bites is the latest horror offering from director Spider One, known for his work on Allegoria. This time, he crafts a slow-burn psychological horror that takes its time unraveling its mysteries—perhaps too much time. While the film eventually delivers a striking conclusion, the road to get there is uneven, relying on atmosphere and suggestion rather than sustained tension or narrative drive.
At the heart of the film is Krsy Fox, who also edited the feature. She delivers a subdued but emotionally raw performance as a single mother grappling with an unseen force, her weary expressions and hushed delivery emphasising the toll of her situation. The film leans heavily on her ability to carry the story, and while she does an admirable job, the script doesn’t always give her enough to work with. For much of the runtime, she feels trapped in a cycle of quiet suffering, with little forward momentum until the film’s final stretch. When she finally gets the chance to break free in the climax, she commands the screen—but by then, some viewers may have already checked out.
One of Little Bites‘ most notable draws is the inclusion of horror icons Barbara Crampton and Heather Langenkamp. Unfortunately, their roles are brief, more like cameo appearances than substantial contributions to the narrative. While their presence adds credibility and a nostalgic thrill for genre fans, it’s ultimately underutilised, leaving the film feeling like a missed opportunity to fully embrace its horror lineage.
Visually, the film is draped in a bleak, muted aesthetic, reinforcing the protagonist’s isolation and dread. Spider One’s direction is methodical, favoring slow, creeping tension over jump scares or overt horror spectacle. While this approach has the potential to be effective, the film struggles with pacing, often lingering on scenes that don’t add much beyond mood-setting. The ambiguity of the horror elements is intriguing at first but becomes frustrating as the film continues to withhold key developments for too long.
Despite these flaws, Little Bites does have its moments, particularly in its final act. The slow burn finally ignites into something far more compelling, delivering a climax that is both visceral and visually impactful. It’s a glimpse of what the film could have been had it maintained that level of engagement throughout.
The Prognosis:
Ultimately, Little Bites is a film that asks for patience—perhaps too much. While Krsy Fox gives a solid performance and the conclusion lands with force, the journey to get there is underwhelming. For those who appreciate methodical psychological horror, there’s something to admire here, but for most, the film’s lethargic pace and lack of urgency may leave them craving something with more bite.
Saul Muerte
Little Bites will be streaming on Shudder from Fri 21st Feb.
Enrique López Eguiluz’s Frankenstein’s Bloody Terror (La marca del Hombre Lobo) might seem like a misstep of marketing rather than a monumental moment in horror, but it marked the start of one of Spain’s most enduring contributions to the genre. Starring the legendary Paul Naschy, this film introduced audiences to the character of Waldemar Daninsky, a tormented werewolf who would go on to become a staple of Spanish horror cinema. Despite its narrative shortcomings and modest budget, the film’s legacy lies in its role as a launchpad for Naschy’s prolific career and his significant impact on the genre.
The story follows Waldemar Daninsky, a man cursed with lycanthropy who seeks aid from a seemingly kind doctor and his wife. Unbeknownst to him, they are vampires, leading to an inevitable showdown between werewolf and vampire in a battle of supernatural forces. While the plot is more convoluted than compelling, the film is more about the atmosphere, performances, and sheer enthusiasm for the genre than a tightly crafted narrative.
Paul Naschy (born Jacinto Molina) was the driving force behind Frankenstein’s Bloody Terror and Spanish horror at large. Inspired by Lon Chaney Jr.’s The Wolf Man and Universal’s classic monsters, Naschy not only played the titular werewolf but also penned the script under his real name. His dedication to the genre and his character, Waldemar Daninsky, would lead to a series of werewolf films that spanned decades, solidifying him as an icon of Spanish horror cinema.
What sets Naschy apart is his unabashed love for horror and his commitment to his craft, even when working with limited resources. His portrayal of Daninsky blends physicality, melancholy, and pathos, echoing the tragic monsters of Universal’s golden age. While Frankenstein’s Bloody Terror might not showcase his best work, it laid the foundation for a career that brought Spain’s horror scene to international prominence.
Frankenstein’s Bloody Terror became the first in the Hombre Lobo series, which would see Naschy reprise his role as Daninsky in films like Werewolf Shadow (1971) and The Beast and the Magic Sword (1983). Each entry brought new layers to the character and often leaned into gothic horror tropes, with crumbling castles, fog-drenched landscapes, and a revolving door of supernatural foes, from witches to zombies.
While not every film in the series is a classic, the Hombre Lobo saga became a defining feature of Spanish horror, rivaling the works of Italy’s giallo masters and Britain’s Hammer Films. Naschy’s dedication to the genre and his character ensured that Spain had a unique voice in the horror landscape of the 20th century.
Though Frankenstein’s Bloody Terror is notable for its place in history, the film itself is far from flawless. The story often feels like a patchwork of horror clichés, with minimal cohesion. The addition of “Frankenstein” to the English title was a purely marketing-driven decision, as no such character exists in the film. The low-budget effects and some uneven performances don’t help, though they do add a certain charm for fans of campy horror.
What saves the film is its gothic atmosphere, a strong sense of visual style, and Naschy’s earnest performance. The battle between werewolf and vampire, though somewhat clunky, is a highlight and hints at the potential that would be better realised in later films.
While Frankenstein’s Bloody Terror may not rank among the greats of 1960s horror, it deserves recognition for what it represents. It’s the birth of a legend—Paul Naschy’s Waldemar Daninsky—and a pivotal moment for Spanish horror cinema. The film’s flaws are undeniable, but its ambition and Naschy’s passion shine through, making it a must-watch for fans of cult horror history.
With Frankenstein’s Bloody Terror, the seeds of an enduring legacy were sown. Though not the best in the Hombre Lobo series, it is an important first step in Paul Naschy’s journey as the face of Spanish horror—a journey that would cement his place among the genre’s most iconic figures.
Released in 1968, Hajime Sato’s Goké, Body Snatcher from Hell (吸血鬼ゴケミドロ) stands as one of the most unique entries in Japan’s 1960s sci-fi and horror boom. Combining apocalyptic dread, alien invasion, and vampiric terror, Sato crafts a surreal, nightmarish vision that is as bold in its execution as it is bleak in its messaging. Though the film is far from polished, its stylistic flourishes and nihilistic tone leave an indelible mark on genre cinema.
The story begins with a plane crash in a remote, barren wasteland after a bizarre red glow in the sky signals something ominous. The crash survivors, an eclectic group of characters ranging from a politician to a widow, soon find themselves hunted by gelatinous alien creatures. These beings possess their victims, turning them into bloodthirsty vampires with grotesque gashes on their foreheads. As paranoia and distrust spread among the group, the alien menace reveals a chilling intent that transcends mere survival horror.
Hajime Sato, known for his work in genre films like The Golden Bat, injects Goké with a singular style that sets it apart from other 1960s horror. The film’s striking visuals—vivid orange skies, the eerie glow of the alien blobs, and the stark, desolate landscapes—create a surreal atmosphere that feels like a waking nightmare. The opening plane sequence alone, with its unnatural lighting and creeping tension, sets the tone for the otherworldly horror to come.
Sato’s direction balances campy elements with genuine dread, a challenging feat given the film’s low budget. The alien creatures, while rudimentary in design, are unsettling in their simplicity. The imagery of the possessed victims, with their blood-drained pallor and grotesque forehead wounds, leaves a lasting impression.
While the film revels in its sci-fi and horror tropes, it also serves as a biting commentary on humanity’s darker instincts. The survivors’ descent into selfishness, betrayal, and moral collapse mirrors the grim inevitability of the alien threat. In a post-war Japan still grappling with nuclear anxieties and Cold War tensions, Goké reflects a society haunted by existential dread and the spectre of its own self-destruction.
The film’s apocalyptic ending—bleak even by horror standards—underscores this nihilistic worldview. The aliens’ ultimate plan to extinguish humanity feels less like a villain’s scheme and more like a cosmic inevitability, hammering home the film’s themes of futility and doom.
While Goké excels in atmosphere and thematic ambition, its narrative can feel uneven, with some character dynamics coming across as contrived or underdeveloped. The cast, while serviceable, struggles at times to elevate the more melodramatic moments. Yet, these shortcomings are overshadowed by the sheer audacity of the film’s vision.
The film’s mashup of sci-fi, horror, and social allegory was undoubtedly ahead of its time, influencing later works like Alien and even The Thing. Its rawness and unpolished charm lend it a distinct identity, making it a standout in Japan’s rich genre cinema of the 1960s.
Fifty-five years later, Goké, Body Snatcher from Hell remains a fascinating artifact of 1960s genre filmmaking. Hajime Sato’s unique vision elevates what could have been a campy B-movie into a surreal and unsettling experience. Its themes of paranoia, human frailty, and inevitable doom feel as relevant today as they did in the turbulent era of its release.
Though not without its flaws, Goké is a testament to the power of bold storytelling and stylistic ambition, earning its place as a cult classic of cosmic horror.
When The Stepford Wives premiered in 1975, it cast a satirical and sinister gaze on the idealised vision of suburban life, blending feminist critique with psychological horror. Based on Ira Levin’s 1972 novel, the film holds a mirror to societal anxieties, much like Levin’s earlier masterpiece, Rosemary’s Baby. Directed by Bryan Forbes and starring Katharine Ross in one of her finest performances, The Stepford Wives remains a provocative yet imperfect exploration of gender roles, technology, and societal conformity.
The story follows Joanna Eberhart (Ross), a photographer and mother who relocates to the seemingly idyllic community of Stepford, Connecticut, with her husband and children. As Joanna tries to settle into her new surroundings, she becomes uneasy about the other women in town, whose personalities are unsettlingly uniform and whose behaviour borders on robotic servitude. The unsettling truth about Stepford is slowly unveiled, exposing a malevolent force lurking beneath the neighbourhood’s polished exterior.
Much like Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Stepford Wives trades on Levin’s ability to turn domestic spaces into suffocating prisons. Both stories centre on a woman whose autonomy is systematically stripped away by patriarchal forces disguised as loving partners or harmless neighbours. In Rosemary’s Baby, the terror lies in the spiritual exploitation of Rosemary, whereas Joanna’s nightmare is grounded in technological domination and societal expectations of perfection.
Levin’s sharp critiques of power dynamics, gender politics, and the veneer of progressiveness still resonate. However, The Stepford Wives lacks some of the timeless bite of Rosemary’s Baby. While the film is eerily prescient about the commodification of women and the pressures to conform to societal ideals, its dated portrayal of second-wave feminism and its white, upper-middle-class focus limits its broader cultural relevance today.
Ross’s portrayal of Joanna is the beating heart of the film. She imbues the character with a sense of independence and vulnerability, making her gradual realisation of the truth all the more harrowing. Her performance captures both the relatable frustrations of being a woman in a male-dominated world and the existential dread of losing oneself to that world.
Ross’s naturalistic acting helps ground the film’s more fantastical elements, making the Stepford women’s eerie perfection all the more jarring. Her chemistry with Paula Prentiss, who plays Joanna’s free-spirited friend Bobbie, adds a spark to the narrative, making Bobbie’s eventual “transformation” into an obedient housewife one of the film’s most haunting moments.
Viewed through a modern lens, The Stepford Wives is both progressive and outdated. Its critique of patriarchal control and the erasure of individuality remains potent, particularly in the era of social media perfection and AI technologies. However, its framing of gender politics feels rooted in a specific 1970s feminist context that doesn’t fully align with today’s intersectional conversations about gender, race, and class.
The film’s focus on affluent white women navigating the suburbs excludes broader discussions about marginalised groups, whose struggles with autonomy and societal expectations differ vastly. Additionally, the technological aspect of the Stepford wives feels charmingly anachronistic in a world where AI and robotics have advanced far beyond what the film envisioned.
Fifty years later, The Stepford Wives remains an important, if flawed, cultural artifact. It showcases Ira Levin’s talent for turning societal anxieties into gripping, horrifying stories while featuring a standout performance from Katharine Ross. Though its themes feel both ahead of their time and tied to a specific cultural moment, the film’s critique of conformity and gender dynamics continues to spark reflection.
In the end, The Stepford Wives is a chilling reminder that even the most idyllic façades often conceal darker truths. While not as timeless as Rosemary’s Baby, it endures as a cautionary tale about the dangers of idealised perfection and the cost of erasing individuality in pursuit of a false utopia.
Few names in the horror world conjure the same visceral unease and fascination as Junji Ito. Revered as a master of manga horror, Ito’s works delve into the grotesque, the surreal, and the psychologically unnerving. In 2000, the world saw two cinematic interpretations of his creations: Tomie: Replay, an unsettling sequel in the Tomie franchise, and Uzumaki, a kaleidoscopic nightmare of spirals and obsession. These films, though vastly different in tone and execution, highlight both the brilliance and challenges of adapting Ito’s unique vision for the screen.
Junji Ito’s manga are renowned for their unsettling blend of cosmic horror and body horror, underpinned by his meticulous artwork and narrative unpredictability. Whether it’s the unrelenting reincarnation of the titular Tomie or the creeping madness of spirals in Uzumaki, Ito’s work probes the fragile boundaries of sanity and reality. His influence extends far beyond the printed page, inspiring filmmakers, artists, and writers to explore the darker corners of human experience.
The Eternal Allure of Tomie: Replay
Tomie: Replay, directed by Fujirō Mitsuishi, is the second installment in the Tomie film series and continues the tale of the titular femme fatale—a supernatural being who seduces and destroys everyone in her path. Like the manga, the film captures Tomie’s unnerving ability to return from the dead, her beauty masking her monstrous nature.
While Replay carries the eerie charm of Ito’s narrative, it doesn’t quite capture the full dread of the source material. The film leans heavily into its psychological horror roots but struggles to elevate itself above its predecessor, offering an uneven pace and a more subdued atmosphere. That said, the concept of Tomie herself—a perfect blend of beauty and horror—remains fascinating and serves as a testament to Ito’s knack for creating unforgettable characters.
The Surreal Horror of Uzumaki
If Tomie: Replay is unsettling, Uzumaki is outright hypnotic. Directed by Higuchinsky, this adaptation of Ito’s infamous manga is a surreal, visually arresting journey into a town cursed by spirals. From snail-like mutations to hair that twists and tangles into impossible shapes, the film embraces the bizarre and grotesque, embodying the manga’s descent into madness.
What makes Uzumaki stand out is its commitment to the surreal. The film translates Ito’s intricate, haunting artwork into a dreamlike atmosphere, creating a sense of unease. While budgetary constraints occasionally limit the impact of its visuals, Uzumaki successfully captures the spirit of Ito’s work, making it a standout among adaptations.
The 2000 releases of Tomie: Replay and Uzumaki highlight the enduring appeal of Junji Ito’s stories. While Tomie explores personal obsession and destruction, Uzumaki delves into a more abstract, cosmic terror, reflecting the breadth of Ito’s imagination.
Ito’s works have continued to inspire adaptations, from live-action films to anime series, but they remain notoriously difficult to translate perfectly to the screen. The detailed, otherworldly visuals of his manga often defy conventional filmmaking, and the oppressive atmosphere he creates is difficult to replicate outside the confines of his inked panels.
Twenty-five years on, Tomie: Replay and Uzumaki remain milestones in the cinematic exploration of Junji Ito’s horror. While Tomie: Replay offers a glimpse into the franchise’s continuing appeal, Uzumaki achieves something greater—an almost hallucinatory dive into the nightmarish. Together, these films serve as a testament to the power of Ito’s stories and their ability to disturb and captivate audiences across mediums.
For fans of Junji Ito, these adaptations are essential viewing, flawed yet fascinating pieces that showcase why his works continue to haunt the imagination of horror enthusiasts worldwide.
Surgeons of Horror 