• About
  • podcasts
  • Shop

Surgeons of Horror

~ Dissecting horror films

Surgeons of Horror

Author Archives: surgeons of horror

Your Monster – A Tale of Monsters Within and Without

24 Sunday Nov 2024

Posted by surgeons of horror in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

caroline lindy, film, horror, melissa barrera, movies, Rialto Distribution, Rialto Entertainment, tommy dewey

Melissa Barrera’s undeniable star power is the cornerstone of Your Monster, a feature-length adaptation of Caroline Lindy’s acclaimed short film. For fans of Barrera (Scream, In the Heights), her magnetic screen presence alone may be reason enough to watch, as she brings depth and relatability to a tale rooted in personal struggle and societal neglect. As Lindy’s script expands from its original short-film premise, it wrestles with maintaining focus, resulting in uneven pacing, but Barrera keeps the emotional center intact, inviting viewers into the stormy psyche of her character.

Your Monster reimagines the archetypal Beauty and the Beast tale, twisting its romantic elements into a metaphor for mental health—a beast that both protects and consumes its host. For this reviewer, the premise evokes nostalgia for the 1980s TV series starring Ron Perlman and Linda Hamilton, though Lindy’s darker approach is very much a product of modern anxieties. The film’s strength lies in its exploration of neglected mental health, illustrating how inner demons, if left unaddressed, can fester into something monstrous. However, the film’s genre-blending between psychological drama and fantastical horror doesn’t always land, leaving the metaphor sometimes muddled. Still, with Barrera’s compelling performance and moments of heartfelt reflection, Your Monster offers a thoughtful, if flawed, glimpse into the monsters we create—and the possibility of taming them.

Visually, the film delivers an atmospheric experience that balances between eerie intimacy and fantastical surrealism. The titular monster’s design—a blend of shadow and human-like features—is both unnerving and strangely sympathetic, embodying the duality of its role in the protagonist’s life. Caroline Lindy’s direction demonstrates a strong grasp of mood and symbolism, though some of the film’s extended sequences veer into indulgence, stretching its central conceit thin.

The Prognosis:

Despite its flaws, Your Monster is a bold, heartfelt exploration of inner turmoil and resilience, buoyed by Barrera’s standout performance and a narrative that dares to wade into murky emotional depths. It’s imperfect but worth a watch for those seeking a horror story with a poignant emotional core.

  • Saul Muerte

Your Monster will be screening in Australian cinemas nationwide from 28th Nov.

Night of the Big Heat (1967): A B-Horror That Fails to Sizzle

23 Saturday Nov 2024

Posted by surgeons of horror in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

1960s horror, 1960s retrospective, christopher lee, film, horror, john lymington, movies, peter cushing, terence fisher

With the dynamic pairing of Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing at its core, Night of the Big Heat seems poised for greatness, especially for fans of mid-century British horror. Directed by Terence Fisher, a Hammer Films mainstay, the movie adapts John Lymington’s novel about an unexplained heatwave plaguing a small island off the British coast. From the outset, the setup brims with potential: the mysterious weather anomaly and its connection to extraterrestrial forces create an intriguing framework. However, despite the gravitas brought by Lee and Cushing, the film fails to rise above its status as a modestly entertaining B-movie.

The charm lies primarily in its retro appeal, with limited special effects and a tone that leans into the quirks of low-budget 1960s sci-fi horror. Christopher Lee’s authoritative portrayal of scientist Godfrey Hanson adds depth, even when the plot veers into absurdity, while Peter Cushing delivers his signature polish, albeit in a more understated role than usual. However, the movie is let down by a slow pace and underwhelming tension, as well as budget constraints that reduce the alien threat to little more than glowing orbs. The production’s ambition to create atmospheric horror feels stifled by its resources, though the oppressive heat and rural isolation add some unease.

Ultimately, Night of the Big Heat offers mild entertainment but fails to distinguish itself in the pantheon of 1960s genre cinema. For devoted fans of Lee, Cushing, or nostalgic B-horror, it holds some charm, but for broader audiences, it’s more of a lukewarm experience that may not burn bright but flickers enough for the curious viewer.

  • Saul Muerte

The Creep Tapes: Episode 3 (Jeremy) Review

22 Friday Nov 2024

Posted by surgeons of horror in episode review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

creep, horror, mark duplass, patrick brice, reviews, shudder, shudder australia, the creep tapes

Shudder Original Series
Series Premiere Date: November 22, 2024

In “Jeremy,” The Creep Tapes continues its deep dive into unsettling territory with a narrative that centers on lust, shame, and deceit. The titular character Jeremy is a burgeoning YouTuber who hosts a show titled Gotcha!, dedicated to exposing controversial figures. His latest subject, a self-proclaimed priest, leads him directly into the orbit of Josef, the infamous serial killer from the series. What begins as a seemingly bold exposé unravels into a chilling game, with Jeremy’s curiosity and hubris placing him squarely in Josef’s sights.

Mark Duplass returns as Josef, delivering a character performance steeped in manipulative charm and sinister undertones. While it’s always intriguing to see Duplass breathe life into this calculating villain, the narrative risks becoming repetitive. Josef’s tactics, while terrifying, are increasingly predictable, stripping some of the tension that earlier episodes had so masterfully constructed. Jeremy’s arc, though compelling in concept, doesn’t quite break the mold, relying on familiar tropes of an unsuspecting victim lured by a dangerous predator.

Where the episode shines is in its exploration of themes. Lust and shame are woven into the fabric of Jeremy’s interactions with Josef, underscored by a theological backdrop that highlights the dangers of blind faith and deception. Unfortunately, these elements are undermined by uneven pacing and a lack of innovation in the series’ now-established formula.

At its halfway point, The Creep Tapes risks stagnation unless it takes bold narrative leaps to freshen Josef’s story. While “Jeremy” is a serviceable entry with moments of dread and intrigue, it doesn’t quite match the impact of earlier episodes. If the series can shift gears and surprise viewers, there’s hope it will regain its momentum.

  • Saul Muerte

The Creep Tapes Series are currently streaming Exclusively on Shudder and AMC+

Rita (2024) – A Missed Opportunity in Dark Fantasy Storytelling

22 Friday Nov 2024

Posted by surgeons of horror in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2017 Guatemala ophanage fire, Giuliana Santa Cruz, jayro bustamante, shudder, shudder australia

Jayro Bustamante’s Rita is a visually ambitious yet emotionally shallow re-imagination of the horrifying 2017 Guatemala orphanage fire. While its foundation—a melding of real-world tragedy with a dark fantasy lens—seems ripe for compelling storytelling, Rita stumbles in its execution, failing to deliver on its potential. The film presents a 13-year-old girl’s harrowing escape from an abusive father, only to find herself in a dystopian state-run institution. Here, fantastical beings and super-powered girls take center stage, attempting to rebel against the malevolent forces controlling their world.

The film’s premise is undeniably intriguing, and Bustamante’s attempt to incorporate fantasy elements, like Rita joining groups called Angels, Wolves, and Rainbows, is conceptually interesting. However, the narrative falters under the weight of sluggish pacing and dialogue-heavy sequences that neither propel the plot nor deepen the characters. Giuliana Santa Cruz gives a commendable performance as Rita, but even her earnest portrayal cannot breathe life into a script that feels meandering and disjointed. While one might hope for the emotional resonance and symbolic depth of a film like Guillermo del Toro’s Pan’s Labyrinth, Rita instead comes across as lacklustre and uninspired.

The film’s biggest misstep lies in its failure to honour the gravity of its source material. The 2017 tragedy is a stark and deeply troubling piece of recent history, yet Rita struggles to balance its fantastical re-imagining with the weight of the real events. The result is a narrative that feels hollow and disconnected from the emotional core it seeks to explore.

The Prognosis:

Despite its commendable ambition and some striking visual moments, Rita ultimately lacks the substance and cohesion to leave a lasting impact. It’s a disappointing venture that falls far short of its promising premise.

  • Saul Muerte

Rita is streaming on Shudder from Fri 22nd November

Sleepy Hollow: Tim Burton’s Gothic Love Letter to Horror’s Golden Era

17 Sunday Nov 2024

Posted by surgeons of horror in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tim Burton’s Sleepy Hollow is a gothic horror masterpiece that perfectly encapsulates the director’s penchant for dark, brooding aesthetics and his thematic preoccupation with the macabre. A reimagining of Washington Irving’s classic tale, the film transforms the sleepy, supernatural folklore into a grand, cinematic spectacle drenched in gothic horror. Burton’s love for the gothic era is evident in every meticulously crafted frame, from the towering, skeletal trees that encroach on the titular town to the shadow-laden interiors that seem to whisper ghostly secrets. His flair for eerie visuals is amplified by Emmanuel Lubezki’s stunning cinematography, where shades of gray and muted tones evoke a sense of dread and melancholia, interrupted only by the vivid splashes of blood. The world of Sleepy Hollow feels alive with gothic energy, and the intricate production design, including its Victorian costumes and haunting set pieces, adds a layer of authenticity to the era Burton so deeply admires.

A crucial strength of Sleepy Hollow lies in its cast, which includes legends of British horror, lending the film a rich pedigree. Christopher Lee’s commanding cameo as a magistrate adds gravitas, while Michael Gough and Ian McDiarmid deliver performances that harken back to the golden age of British gothic cinema. Johnny Depp’s portrayal of Ichabod Crane as a quirky, science-driven investigator brings a modern vulnerability to the character, contrasting beautifully with Christina Ricci’s ethereal presence as Katrina Van Tassel. The film also showcases Burton’s regular collaborator, Danny Elfman, whose haunting score weaves seamlessly into the narrative, heightening the film’s blend of eerie suspense and dark whimsy.

Thematically, Sleepy Hollow leans heavily into Burton’s fascination with the boundary between rationality and superstition. The story pits the cold logic of Depp’s Ichabod against the inexplicable terror of the Headless Horseman, culminating in a narrative that embraces the supernatural as an intrinsic force within its world. While some may critique the film for prioritising style over substance, it remains a quintessential Tim Burton offering—visually arresting, rich in atmosphere, and deeply rooted in gothic tradition. Sleepy Hollow stands as a loving tribute to the genre, earning its place as one of Burton’s most iconic works and a cherished piece of gothic cinema.

  • Saul Muerte

Frankenstein Created Woman: Science Meets Soul in Hammer’s Boldest Frankenstein Entry Yet

16 Saturday Nov 2024

Posted by surgeons of horror in retrospective

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

1960s horror, 1960s retrospective, film, Frankenstein, horror, movies, peter cushing

By its fourth entry in Hammer’s Frankenstein saga, Frankenstein Created Woman veered into uncharted thematic territory, exploring the transference of the soul rather than focusing solely on the reconstruction of flesh. The film’s roots trace back to an abandoned concept for the Tales of Frankenstein television series, which was later resurrected as a collaboration between Hammer and Twentieth Century Fox. Loosely inspired by Roger Vadim’s And God Created Woman, the feature delved into theological and philosophical dimensions, examining identity, morality, and the repercussions of manipulating the human essence. This ambitious narrative shift elevated it among Hammer’s catalog and gained recognition from cinephiles such as Martin Scorsese.

Central to the film’s success is Peter Cushing’s commanding reprisal of Baron Frankenstein. Cushing’s nuanced performance lends gravitas to the morally ambiguous doctor, whose unrelenting pursuit of scientific discovery transcends ethical boundaries. Opposite Cushing is Susan Denberg as Christina, a woman resurrected with a fractured identity. The tragic duality of Christina and her lover Hans, whose soul is embedded within her, provides a poignant underpinning to the grotesque premise. Denberg, a former Playboy Playmate immersed in the vibrant “It” crowd of the 1960s, including Roman Polanski, brought an uncanny mix of fragility and menace to her role. To bolster the film’s appeal, she was featured in a high-profile publicity campaign, though her career in film was short-lived. With its innovative focus on the isolation of the soul and a revenge-driven narrative, Frankenstein Created Woman became a bold and emotionally charged addition to the Hammer canon.

  • Saul Muerte

The Mummy’s Shroud (1967): A Cursed Shroud, a Creature’s Wrath, and a Studio’s Farewell

16 Saturday Nov 2024

Posted by surgeons of horror in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

hammer films, horror, Movie review, mummies, The Mummy

As the third entry in Hammer’s Mummy series, The Mummy’s Shroud faced an uphill battle to live up to the studio’s past successes. Despite its chilling premise involving a cursed shroud and the inevitable vengeance it unleashes, the film struggled to achieve the tension and excitement expected from Hammer’s golden age. Its release coincided with the closing chapter of an era, marking the final Hammer production to be filmed at the iconic Bray Studios. Unfortunately, the lackluster performances of the lead cast diminished the impact of the film’s otherwise atmospheric storytelling.

One saving grace was the work of Hammer veteran Michael Ripper, whose performance as the beleaguered Longbarrow stood out amid the weaker portrayals of the principal characters. Ripper’s innate charm and subtlety helped maintain audience engagement, even as the narrative faltered. While some gory scenes were cut to meet censorship demands, the special effects used in the Mummy’s demise were exceptional for their time. The climactic disintegration scene became a technical highlight, showcasing Hammer’s ingenuity in visual effects design. Despite its shortcomings, the film retains nostalgic appeal and is notable for its craftsmanship, though it remains overshadowed by Hammer’s more compelling creature features. Released alongside Frankenstein Created Woman as part of a double bill, The Mummy’s Shroud paled in comparison, offering modest thrills but failing to achieve the same level of ambition or resonance.

  • Saul Muerte

Into the Depths of Darkness: Coffin Joe’s Twisted Quest Continues in This Night I’ll Possess Your Corpse

15 Friday Nov 2024

Posted by surgeons of horror in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

1960s horror, 1960s retrospective, coffin joe, jose mojica marins, ze do caixao

This Night I’ll Possess Your Corpse (1967), José Mojica Marins’ sequel to At Midnight I’ll Take Your Soul, dives deeper into the twisted world of Coffin Joe, expanding on themes of existential defiance, legacy, and brutal self-justification. The film builds on the reputation of the sinister undertaker, who now intensifies his search for the “perfect” mother of his progeny. With higher stakes, more explicit brutality, and an even stronger commitment to thematic audacity, This Night I’ll Possess Your Corpse pushes the boundaries of Marins’ original vision.

The film’s plot follows Coffin Joe (Zé do Caixão) as he continues his obsessive quest for a worthy woman to bear his child, a pursuit that becomes even darker and more violent. After surviving the retribution faced in At Midnight I’ll Take Your Soul, Joe, unrepentant and emboldened, begins torturing and testing women, pushing them through horrifying trials to determine if they meet his twisted criteria. While his earlier blasphemy and moral nihilism painted him as a provocateur, Joe now appears even more ruthless, embodying a sort of twisted Darwinism as he justifies his crimes in the name of securing his legacy. The sequel effectively ups the ante, making Coffin Joe’s deranged quest for immortality and control over fate feel more visceral and disturbing.

The film’s visual style expands as well, reflecting the broader canvas Marins had to work with. There’s a particularly memorable scene where Coffin Joe dreams of Hell, shot in lurid colour, providing a startling contrast to the film’s otherwise stark black-and-white palette. This scene remains one of the most striking and surreal moments in 1960s horror cinema, reinforcing the film’s surrealist roots and adding a vivid, almost expressionistic element to Joe’s nightmarish world. Marins used his limited resources creatively, and this bold use of colour makes an already intense story feel even more haunting and visually ambitious.

In terms of character, Coffin Joe is more complex here, though still equally loathsome. Marins’ portrayal captures Joe’s internal contradictions—the philosophical musings, violent nihilism, and brazen self-confidence—that make him such a compelling anti-hero. Joe’s obsession with purity and genetic perfection not only reflects his ego and disregard for human life but also serves as a grim satire of authoritarian ideals. His monologues delve further into his worldview, questioning religion, morality, and society, challenging the audience directly as he did in the first film, but now with even greater force. Marins’ unhinged commitment to the role provides a dark charisma that keeps the viewer hooked, even if the character’s acts are nothing short of monstrous.

The film’s pacing and plot structure, however, have their challenges. While This Night I’ll Possess Your Corpse benefits from a clearer narrative arc than its predecessor, some scenes feel repetitive, with certain trials and tortures overstaying their welcome. The intense focus on Coffin Joe’s sadistic “experiments” on the women he encounters might leave some viewers feeling fatigued, as the shock value loses impact with repetition. Additionally, the sequel’s reliance on violence and shock elements over psychological horror can sometimes feel less innovative than the original’s eerie atmosphere and unstructured approach.

Nevertheless, This Night I’ll Possess Your Corpse is a provocative work that explores the darker sides of human nature with a gleeful defiance of conventional morality and cinematic norms. While not perfect, the film stands as a testament to Marins’ singular vision, and his fearless approach makes this entry a cult classic in its own right. For those willing to venture into Coffin Joe’s demented quest, the film delivers a rare and unique horror experience that continues to resonate as both an unsettling thriller and a pointed critique of authoritarian ideals.

For fans of At Midnight I’ll Take Your Soul, the sequel is a must-watch, pushing Coffin Joe’s story further into the realm of mythic horror while reflecting the raw inventiveness of 1960s horror cinema.

  • Saul Muerte

The Creep Tapes: Episodes 1 & 2 Review

15 Friday Nov 2024

Posted by surgeons of horror in episode review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

creep, mark duplass, patrick brice, shudder, shudder australia, the creep tapes

Shudder Original Series
Series Premiere Date: November 15, 2024

The double-episode premiere of The Creep Tapes plunges us back into the disconcerting world of Mark Duplass’s chilling serial killer. In Mike, the first episode, a familiar formula greets us as Mike, a hopeful videographer, accepts a job to shoot an acting reel for a prospective client. The twist? That “client” turns out to be none other than Duplass’s now-iconic antagonist, bringing with him all the self-deprecating charm and unsettling humor we’ve come to expect. Episode two, Elliot, introduces a shift in tone, as a hapless birdwatcher stumbles into the killer’s orbit, sparking a disturbing game of manipulation.

The Good
The series premiere hits the ground running with Mike, diving into territory fans of the original films will relish. Duplass’s performance anchors the episode, weaving humor, unpredictability, and genuine menace into every interaction. The callbacks to Creep and Creep 2—from Josef’s cinephile tendencies to his darkly comic musings—strike a nostalgic chord while setting a brutal tone. The climax delivers a shocking punch, ensuring audiences won’t underestimate this series’ capacity for horror.

In Elliot, the series ventures into slightly more harrowing emotional terrain. The gentle, unassuming Elliot proves a sharp contrast to his tormentor, heightening the tension and giving Duplass even more room to showcase his character’s manipulative prowess. The second episode suggests a broader exploration of the killer’s impact on different personality types, teasing the psychological depth the series might delve into as it progresses.

The Less Good
While Mike benefits from familiarity, it treads so close to the original Creep that it risks feeling derivative. The reliance on established beats could leave some viewers wanting more innovation in its approach. Meanwhile, Elliot is a more engaging departure but lacks the humor and levity of its predecessor, leaning heavily into discomfort without providing much narrative payoff.

Key Standouts
Duplass once again proves he’s the linchpin of this series. His ability to balance Josef’s disarming charm with an undercurrent of malice remains compelling, ensuring viewers are as entertained as they are unnerved. The visual style—grainy, intimate, and voyeuristic—draws audiences into the killer’s unsettling perspective, reminding us why Creep thrived as a cult favorite.


The Prognosis:

The premiere of The Creep Tapes captures the essence of what made the original films so effective: a low-budget, character-driven approach to horror that feels personal and claustrophobic. While Mike sticks closely to the formula, Elliot hints at darker, more introspective possibilities. Together, these episodes lay a solid foundation for a series that promises to unsettle and entertain in equal measure.

  • Saul Muerte

The Creep Tapes Series are currently streaming Exclusively on Shudder and AMC+

Blood of the Virgins: A Lustful Bite of 60s Horror That Misses the Mark

14 Thursday Nov 2024

Posted by surgeons of horror in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

1960s horror, 1960s retrospective, Dracula, horror, movies, vampire, vampires

Blood of the Virgins (1967) is an interesting attempt at vampire horror that stumbles through its narrative despite its atmospheric promise. Directed by Emilio Vieyra, the film tries to capitalise on the familiar gothic elements of betrayal, seduction, and the eternal curse of vampirism, but its low budget and muddled storytelling prevent it from fully sinking its teeth into viewers.

The film opens with Ofelia, who’s set to marry Eduardo but finds herself in a tangled web with her lover Gustavo. Despite some pre-wedding jitters, Ofelia goes through with the marriage, only for Gustavo to interrupt their wedding night with murder and a fateful bite, turning her into a vampire. Fast-forward to the 1960s, where a group of travellers takes refuge in a deserted lodge after their van breaks down. Ofelia reappears, now a tragic figure caught between the pull of seduction and her growing weariness with the vampire’s curse.

While the setup is promising and echoes classic vampire tales, Blood of the Virgins falters in its execution. The transition from Ofelia’s tragedy to the modern-day storyline is rough, leaving viewers with little investment in the new characters. The young travellers quickly fall into horror stereotypes, and their interactions feel shallow, making it hard to care about their fates as they encounter Ofelia. The central mystery surrounding the vampire’s motives and how the group will survive unfolds predictably, with suspense largely absent and horror scenes lacking bite.

Visually, Blood of the Virgins does manage to capture some atmospheric shots with moody lighting and a dreamy, surreal quality. However, it doesn’t do enough to maintain tension or provide any significant scares. Vieyra’s direction seems uncertain, as if torn between crafting a horror film and leaning into the film’s more exploitative elements. The horror never reaches the eerie or unsettling, instead landing in a kind of melodrama that drags down the pacing.

Ofelia, the story’s would-be tragic heroine, lacks the depth that might make her journey compelling. Her transformation and internal conflict about her cursed life could have added emotional weight, but they’re skimmed over in favour of a few romanticised seduction scenes that lack nuance. The attempt at sensual horror falls flat, feeling more like an obligatory nod to the eroticism associated with vampire lore than an organic part of the story.

While Blood of the Virgins holds some intrigue as a piece of Argentinian horror cinema from the 1960s, it ultimately fails to deliver as either a compelling vampire story or an effective horror film. It’s an uneven experience best suited for those curious about vintage Latin American genre cinema, but for most viewers, it’s likely to feel like a missed opportunity. Vieyra’s vision doesn’t quite come together here, leaving Blood of the Virgins feeling more like a hazy, half-formed nightmare than a film that truly haunts.

  • Saul Muerte
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016

Categories

  • A Night of Horror Film Festival
  • Alien franchise
  • Alliance Francaise French Film Festival
  • Australian Horror
  • Best Movies and Shows
  • Competition
  • dark nights film fest
  • episode review
  • Flashback Fridays
  • Friday the 13th Franchise
  • Full Moon Sessions
  • Halloween franchise
  • In Memorium
  • Interview
  • japanese film festival
  • John Carpenter
  • killer pigs
  • midwest weirdfest
  • MidWest WierdFest
  • MonsterFest
  • movie article
  • movie of the week
  • Movie review
  • New Trailer
  • News article
  • podcast episode
  • podcast review
  • press release
  • retrospective
  • Rialto Distribution
  • Ring Franchise
  • series review
  • Spanish horror
  • sydney film festival
  • Sydney Underground Film Festival
  • The Blair Witch Franchise
  • the conjuring franchise
  • The Exorcist
  • The Howling franchise
  • Top 10 list
  • Top 12 List
  • top 13 films
  • Trash Night Tuesdays on Tubi
  • umbrella entertainment
  • Uncategorized
  • Universal Horror
  • Wes Craven
  • wes craven's the scream years

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Surgeons of Horror
    • Join 218 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Surgeons of Horror
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar