• About
  • podcasts
  • Shop

Surgeons of Horror

~ Dissecting horror films

Surgeons of Horror

Author Archives: surgeons of horror

“Fangs of the Living Dead: A False Start from the Father of the Blind Dead”

22 Sunday Jun 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

1960s horror, 1960s retrospective, amando de ossorio, anita ekberg

Before the eerie, hooded knights of Tombs of the Blind Dead rode out from the graveyards of Spanish horror cinema, director Amando de Ossorio dipped his toes into the genre with Fangs of the Living Dead—a gothic curiosity that plays more like a confused homage than a fully-formed fright fest. Released in 1969 under the alternate title Malenka, this early effort is notable less for its quality than for the glimmers of talent that would soon flourish in his later, more celebrated work.

The premise is classic Euro-horror: a young woman (played by the ever-enigmatic Anita Ekberg) inherits a crumbling castle from a mysterious uncle, only to find herself surrounded by alluring women, dark legends, and hints of vampirism. So far, so Hammer-lite. But where the British studios leaned into blood, mood, and menace, Fangs of the Living Dead waffles between gothic horror and awkward melodrama, never quite settling on a tone or identity.

Ekberg is game, and her presence gives the film a touch of continental class. But the supporting cast is uneven, and the plotting stumbles through cliché after cliché without much conviction. What should feel mysterious or sensual often comes off as wooden or unintentionally camp.

The most frustrating element is the bait-and-switch structure of the film. There are vampires—or at least the idea of them—but just when the story starts to build towards supernatural revelation, it pulls the rug out with a rationalist twist that saps the atmosphere. And yet, depending on which cut you’re watching, there’s an added final beat that seems to suggest the supernatural was real all along. It’s a tonal mess, and not the good kind.

Despite its shortcomings, Fangs of the Living Dead is a curious artifact. You can see de Ossorio tinkering with gothic tropes and experimenting with shadows and stone. The castle setting, the doomed lineage, the women of uncertain allegiance—all of these would be refined in his Blind Dead series just a few years later. While this film lacks the eerie silence, decaying iconography, and creeping dread that defined Tombs of the Blind Dead (1972), it does point to a director finding his way through genre fog.

The Prognosis:

Fangs of the Living Dead is more forgettable than fang-tastic. It’s an early, faltering step from a filmmaker who would soon become one of Spain’s leading horror voices. Not essential viewing, but worth a look for fans of Ossorio’s later work—or for those with a fondness for the weird and wavering twilight of 1960s Euro-horror.

  • Saul Muerte

“28 Years Later: A Familiar Virus, A Mutated Vision”

21 Saturday Jun 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

28 days later, 28 years later, aaron taylor-johnson, alex garland, danny boyle, film, horror, jodie comer, ralph fiennes, zombie, zombie horror

In 28 Days Later (2002), Danny Boyle and Alex Garland didn’t just kick the zombie genre into overdrive—they reanimated it. With rage-fueled infected, urgent digital grit, and a raw emotional core, it felt like the end of the world captured in real time. The sequel, 28 Weeks Later, traded intimacy for scale and kept the horror grounded in family trauma and moral collapse. Now, 28 Years Later arrives with all the right ingredients—Boyle and Garland reunited, a new angle on the infected, and a haunting performance from Jodie Comer—yet somehow the dish feels tepid, left too long to simmer in its own legacy.

Set nearly three decades after the initial outbreak, the film offers an evolved world, where quarantine zones remain ruthlessly enforced and life persists in liminal spaces. Comer plays Isla, a survivor embedded in a tight-knit community on a remote island connected to the mainland by a single, heavily guarded causeway. It’s a solid setting, rife with dread and potential—one that echoes the tension and bleak solitude of the original. But where 28 Days Later propelled itself with primal urgency, this entry often feels subdued, wandering through plot points instead of sprinting toward them.

The heart of the story follows a lone expedition back into the mainland’s infected heartland, where the infected have not only continued to mutate, but so too have the remnants of human society. The central theme once again revolves around family dynamics, something that has served as a connective tissue across all three films: Brendan Gleeson’s tragic turn in Days, the fractured Carlyle-McCormack family in Weeks, and now a newly-formed surrogate bond at the centre of Years. But here, it feels overemphasised to the point of distraction—particularly in scenes involving Ralph Fiennes, whose ponderous monologues often stall the film’s pulse when it should be quickening.

Comer, however, is the standout. Her portrayal of Isla brings grit, empathy, and conviction to a role that could’ve easily fallen into genre archetypes. She’s the emotional engine of the film, grounding it in human stakes even as the narrative wobbles into philosophical excess. The supporting cast handles their parts well, but none leave quite the same mark.

Visually, Boyle still knows how to stage devastation. His direction remains bold, capturing dereliction and dread with poetic framing. Garland’s script toys with paranoia, substance use, and psychological collapse—recurring themes for the duo—but here they feel more like recycled motifs than fresh meditations. There’s also an odd tonal shift in the final act, when the film suddenly veers into kung fu-style combat and hallucinatory spectacle, abandoning its grounded realism for a jarring dose of genre whiplash. The effect is disorienting and not entirely earned.

Fans looking for the visceral shock and bleak urgency of 28 Days Later may be disappointed. This is not that film. The infected still rage, the world still crumbles, but the pulse has slowed. The film’s strongest moments are its quietest – glimpses of survival, the cost of trust, the strange rituals that have replaced society. But in its desire to evolve, 28 Years Later sometimes forgets what made the original bite so hard in the first place.

The Prognosis:

28 Years Later is a fascinating, if flawed, return to a world that reshaped horror cinema. It’s packed with emotional resonance and striking visuals but often stumbles under the weight of its own ambitions. The virus has changed. Maybe the filmmakers have too.

  • Saul Muerte

“Full Tilt Into the Void: Tobe Hooper’s Lifeforce at 40”

20 Friday Jun 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

colin wilson., mathilda may, space vampires, steve railsbeck, tobe hooper

There’s weird, and then there’s Lifeforce. Tobe Hooper’s 1985 sci-fi horror fever dream didn’t just step outside the box—it set it on fire, turned it into a naked vampire, and launched it into orbit. Forty years on, this glorious trainwreck of a film still pulses with an unholy energy: part alien invasion thriller, part erotic vampire myth, part end-of-days apocalypse, and all unleashed Hooper. It’s a mess—but it’s a beautiful, ambitious, and absolutely unhinged mess.

Based loosely (and we stress loosely) on Colin Wilson’s novel The Space Vampires, Lifeforce begins like Alien and ends like The Omega Man, with an interstellar expedition to Halley’s Comet bringing home something ancient and devastating: a trio of seductive, humanoid vampires who drain the life—literally the force—from their victims. What follows is a strange cocktail of sci-fi espionage, metaphysical dread, zombie contagion, and enough full-frontal nudity to make the MPAA sweat through its polyester.

At the centre of it all is Hooper, hot off the back of Poltergeist (and still shaking off the questions about Spielberg’s creative control). With Lifeforce, he grabs the wheel, hits the gas, and swerves into chaos with wild-eyed conviction. This is Hooper unfiltered, blending gothic horror and pulp science fiction with operatic flair. The film is massive in scale—shot like a prestige epic, scored with bombastic orchestration, and featuring enough laser-beam FX to fry a satellite. It’s hard not to admire the sheer guts of it all.

There’s espionage too—cold war paranoia baked into the script like secret messages in a sandwich. The British government scrambles to contain the outbreak, while American astronauts (including a stiff but determined Steve Railsback) struggle to explain what the hell they brought back. At times, the film plays like The Day of the Jackal with energy-sucking space demons. Other times, it’s Dracula on a spaceship, as Mathilda May’s otherworldly alien lures victims with silence and skin, drawing a hypnotic trail of destruction through the ruins of London.

And it’s in May’s performance—ethereal, deadly, utterly magnetic—that Lifeforce finds its strange gravitational pull. She doesn’t speak a word, but commands the screen like a vampire goddess. She is both object and agent of desire, representing Hooper’s recurring obsession with sexuality as a monstrous, irresistible force.

Yes, it’s convoluted. Yes, it spirals into nonsense. But there’s a manic joy in how it barrels forward, ideas colliding midair like doomed satellites. Life-force theft, reanimation, psychic connections, body horror, possession—it’s all here, stitched together like a mad scientist’s pet project. The tone shifts from serious sci-fi to gothic melodrama to gonzo action, often within a single scene.

And yet, for all its excesses and flaws, Lifeforce endures. It’s campy and chaotic, but also strangely profound. Beneath the spectacle is a film about identity, human weakness, and the eternal hunger for connection—even if that connection destroys you.

The Prognosis:

In an era of sanitised blockbusters and streamlined storytelling, Lifeforce stands out as a relic of fearless filmmaking. It’s a film that swings for the stars and occasionally misses, but when it hits… it leaves a mark.

  • Saul Muerte

8. “Real Fear, Real Fish: How Jaws Birthed Shark Panic and Changed the Ocean Forever”

19 Thursday Jun 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in retrospective

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

jaws, Killer shark, lorraine gray, Richard Dreyfus, Robert Shaw, Roy Scheider, shark movies, Steven Spielberg

You know the saying: life imitates art. But sometimes art takes a chunk out of life and doesn’t let go. That’s what Jaws did. It didn’t just reshape cinema—it rewrote the cultural script for what a shark was, what the ocean meant, and who we were when we dipped a toe in the surf. Spielberg’s fake shark may have been rubber, but the fallout was all too real.

Because when Jaws hit theatres in 1975, it didn’t just break box office records. It detonated a planet-wide phobia. Rational adults who’d swum in the sea their whole lives suddenly refused to go waist-deep. Boating trips were cancelled. Beaches posted shark patrols like they were expecting Normandy-level invasions. People weren’t afraid of sharks before Jaws. After Jaws, they couldn’t stop picturing themselves inside one.

It’s not hard to understand why. Spielberg’s shark wasn’t just a predator—it was a force of nature, a myth made flesh. It was death from below, unknowable and unstoppable. Williams’ theme didn’t help either—it drilled into your brain like a warning siren. And once the public bought in, they didn’t just flinch at the water. They went hunting.

In the years following the release of Jaws, shark killings skyrocketed. Fishermen organised tournaments with the explicit goal of slaughtering as many as possible. Some sharks were mutilated for sport. Others were left to rot as trophies. The film had awakened an ancient fear and rebranded it as a civic duty. Sharks weren’t just animals anymore. They were villains. And the public wanted revenge.

Peter Benchley, who penned the original novel, would spend the rest of his life trying to undo the damage. He became a staunch conservationist, publicly lamenting how Jaws had fed hysteria. He wrote editorials, gave speeches, funded marine science. But the cultural machine had already chewed through the facts and spat out something far juicier: the monster myth.

And that myth still lingers.

Modern marine biologists have tried for decades to rehabilitate the shark’s image. We now know most species are shy, endangered, and critical to ocean ecosystems. We know attacks are rare—freakish outliers, not targeted carnage. But Jaws set the template. It tattooed an idea onto the global psyche: that beneath the surface lurks something ancient, evil, and waiting.

Here’s the kicker: Spielberg didn’t set out to demonise sharks. The terror came from budget constraints, not bloodlust. Bruce the Shark barely worked, and so the film’s horror became abstract, psychological. But abstraction has consequences. When the threat is offscreen, your brain fills in the blanks—and public imagination filled those blanks with teeth.

Yet maybe there’s something poetic in that. Because Jaws isn’t really about a shark—it’s about fear. Fear of nature, of losing control, of our place on the food chain. It’s about how humans respond when faced with something vast and indifferent. We named it. We hunted it. We called it evil. And the sea just kept rolling in.

Fifty years later, we’re still wrestling with the aftermath. Not just in how we make movies, but in how we treat the planet. The irony of Jaws is that it scared us away from the ocean, when what we really should’ve been afraid of was ourselves.

  • Saul Muerte

7. “Between the Teeth: Sound, Editing, and the Sonic Terror of Jaws”

19 Thursday Jun 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in retrospective

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

jaws, Killer shark, lorraine gray, Richard Dreyfus, Robert Shaw, Roy Scheider, shark movies, Steven Spielberg

The scariest thing in Jaws isn’t the shark—it’s the sound of the shark. Two notes. Half a heartbeat. A musical ellipsis that creeps up from the seabed and drills straight into your spine. John Williams didn’t score a monster—he sculpted a presence. One that lurks just outside the frame, gnashing in silence, until your chest tightens and you start checking the shadows under your seat.

In truth, Bruce the Shark barely works on screen. The rubber betrays the realism. It’s stiff, sluggish, and allergic to saltwater. But Spielberg, handcuffed by malfunctioning mechanics and a limited budget, turned to the invisible: sound. And sound became the soul of the film.

Williams’ score is almost mathematical. Minimalist to the point of menace. That primal, pulsing motif—da-dum… da-dum…—doesn’t just suggest the shark is coming. It makes the water itself seem sentient, malevolent. No visuals necessary. Just rhythm. Just dread. Williams said the theme could be interpreted as “relentless, unstoppable,” like fate itself. And he wasn’t wrong. It’s practically aquatic Morse code for you’re screwed.

But the real genius lies in when the sound disappears. The opening attack? No music. Just ambient waves and ragged breathing. Chrissie’s screams. The sound of helplessness. Spielberg and editor Verna Fields trusted the silence—weaponised it, even. They understood that real horror isn’t the monster leaping out, it’s the waiting. The not-knowing. And they cut this film like a time bomb—tick, tick, breath, splash, gone.

Verna Fields deserves sainthood. She didn’t just edit Jaws, she saved it. She built its rhythm with a razor blade and a stopwatch. The cuts are precise, but never sterile. The pacing lets the tension throb, then twist. Her instincts gave Jaws its pulse, and her ear gave it breath. Fields’ decision to linger—on a bobbing raft, on a shark’s-eye view, on a reaction shot just a beat too long—makes the film feel like it’s constantly holding its breath with you.

Sound designer Robert Hoyt and mixer John R. Carter also understood the assignment. The underwater acoustics are muffled, dreamlike, warped—as if you’re already halfway gone. The difference between wet and dry audio isn’t just technical, it’s thematic. The ocean is a place where rules collapse. Where your screams don’t travel. Where your senses betray you.

And then there’s the famous Ben Gardner jump scare—maybe the purest blend of editing, timing, and sonic sabotage ever captured on celluloid. Spielberg throws the entire audience into the ceiling, not with a shark attack, but with a silent, bloated corpse slipping out of a hole in a boat. Fields cut it in her swimming pool. Spielberg added the shriek later. Together, they created a moment that still makes audiences flinch five decades later.

This is the power of Jaws—not just what’s seen, but what’s felt. And feeling is built from rhythm. From restraint. From silence. From two piano keys, repeating like a death mantra.

Other films used gore. Jaws used suggestion. Other films shouted. Jaws whispered.

And we’re still hearing it.

  • Saul Muerte

6. “Amity Is America: The Small-Town Politics of Jaws”

19 Thursday Jun 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in retrospective

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

jaws, Killer shark, lorraine gray, Richard Dreyfus, Robert Shaw, Roy Scheider, shark movies, Steven Spielberg

Amity, as you know, means friendship. That’s the line. The pitch. The myth sold by mayoral pinstripes and anchors in sand. But Jaws is no feel-good postcard. It’s a thinly veiled civics horror story. Underneath the blood and brine is a scathing portrait of a town willing to sacrifice its children for a few more tourist dollars. Sound familiar?

Because Amity is America. Or at least the version of America we don’t like to admit exists—the sun-bleached community where civic pride curdles into denial, where public safety is trumped by profit, and where leadership means smiling through catastrophe with a cigar in hand and blood on your shoes.

Look at Mayor Vaughn, a man so cartoonishly committed to keeping the beaches open he might as well be handing out coupons for half-price limb reattachments. He’s not evil—he’s worse. He’s reasonable. He’s the guy who says “Let’s not overreact” while a shark chews through the local swimming club. His face is everywhere in 2025. He’s every politician downplaying a crisis, spinning a headline, blaming the scientists. Vaughn is the face of inaction, of plausible deniability, of capitalism cloaked in community.

This is the real brilliance of Jaws: it isn’t just a monster movie. It’s a movie about systems. Broken ones. It’s not just the shark that kills Alex Kintner—it’s the chamber of commerce. It’s the vote to keep the beaches open. It’s the hushed phone calls, the shrugged shoulders, the gentle pressure on Brody to “ease up.” The real monster doesn’t have teeth—it has a necktie.

And Brody? He’s not the sheriff, he’s the conscience. The outsider. The guy who moved to town thinking it would be quieter, safer—only to find out that even paradise has politics. His face when he sees that mother waiting for him in black is the face of a man who knows he failed—not because he didn’t try, but because the system didn’t want him to succeed.

It’s all too real. Substitute “shark” for “virus,” “chemical spill,” “gun violence,” “climate change,” take your pick. Jaws is a fable about what happens when truth is inconvenient and accountability is bad for business. A sunny allegory dipped in blood. Amity is the American dream under siege, and the town fathers would rather let it rot than admit something’s wrong.

But Spielberg never shouts. He doesn’t need to. He lets the imagery do the work. The tourist banners flapping in the wind while the ocean turns red. The newspaper headlines are getting smaller. The way Brody’s warnings are always drowned out by local laughter, local logic, and local greed. This isn’t parody—it’s prophecy.

Fifty years on, the shark still scares us—but it’s the town that hits too close to home. Jaws looked at America and asked a brutal question: when danger comes to your doorstep, who gets protected? Who gets ignored? And who gets eaten?

Spoiler: it’s never the ones in charge.

  • Saul Muerte

5. “You Never Saw It Coming: Jaws and the Cinema of the Unseen”

19 Thursday Jun 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Cinema is a visual medium, sure—but Jaws proved that terror thrives in what you don’t see. The great irony of Spielberg’s breakout film is that it gave birth to the modern blockbuster by being almost entirely allergic to spectacle. For a movie that turned sharks into movie monsters and summer into a war zone, Jaws is visually… spare. Patient. Still.

And that’s precisely what makes it terrifying.

Forget what came later—digital sharks flailing across green screens, soaked in overlit gore and blaring musical stings. Spielberg’s Jaws stalks its prey like a documentary. The frame is wide. The pacing slow. We spend an absurd amount of time staring at empty ocean. Just water. Ripples. Rafts. Buoys. Maybe a distant swimmer. The camera drifts. And somehow, it’s unbearable.

Because what Spielberg did—and what modern horror so often forgets—is build suspense, not surprise. He knew the shark was broken, but he also knew the audience’s imagination wasn’t. So he made the sea itself the villain. The wide, blue unknown. A glassy abyss where anything could be lurking just beneath the surface—and usually is.

There’s that shot—that shot—where Brody sits on the beach, scanning the waves while tourists bob lazily through the frame. Spielberg shoots it in long lens, compressing the distance, flattening space. The people blur together. You can’t tell who’s safe. You know something’s coming, but you can’t see it. And then—boom—the scream. The thrashing. The blood. And the audience bolts upright in their seats, gasping like they were pulled under too.

This is the cinema of anticipation. It’s Hitchcock in a Hawaiian shirt, De Palma with a boat license. Spielberg understands that horror lives in the waiting. He lets dread accumulate like algae on the hull. You think about the sound. You think about the space. He gives you inches of shark, seconds of score, and it’s enough to poison your popcorn. It’s why you squirm during the pier scene—not because the monster is attacking, but because the camera just sits there, watching that broken plank slowly drift back to shore. One empty plank. One tension-sodden beat. The implications are more frightening than any splashy attack.

This technique didn’t just shape Jaws—it redefined modern horror language. You can trace its ripple effect through Alien, The Thing, The Descent, Hereditary, The Witch. All films that understand that showing less isn’t about budget—it’s about control. It’s about holding your audience in a vice grip of expectation and then delaying the release.

And yet, like all the best tricks, it’s one modern blockbusters keep forgetting. We now live in the era of sensory overload—monster movies that throw everything at you, all the time, like they’re afraid you’ll check your phone if they hold a shot longer than two seconds. But Jaws held the shot. It made you lean forward. It understood that fear isn’t a jump—it’s a crawl. A slow tide rising.

Fifty years later, it still works. Not because the shark looks real (it doesn’t). Not because the blood is convincing (it’s not). But because Spielberg knew how to manipulate empty space into anxiety. He turned the ocean into a haunted house. And once you’ve been inside, you don’t forget it.

  • Saul Muerte

4. “Hooper, Brody, Quint: A Class War at Sea”

19 Thursday Jun 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in retrospective

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

jaws, Killer shark, lorraine gray, Richard Dreyfus, Robert Shaw, Roy Scheider, shark movies, Steven Spielberg

Before the blood, before the teeth, before the fins slicing through sunlit water—Jaws is a story about three men on a boat. Three archetypes stuffed into a floating coffin and set adrift with nothing but a harpoon gun, some beer, and enough resentment to sink a battleship. Forget the shark for a moment—this is the real engine of the film: Brody, the outsider cop with a conscience, Hooper, the rich-boy oceanographer with gadgets and a grudge, and Quint, the seafaring working-class warrior who’d rather spit on authority than answer to it.

It’s Moby Dick meets 12 Angry Men, with blood in the water and resentment in the air.

Let’s start with Brody—our everyman. A New York transplant trying to keep Amity safe, but slowly realising that civic responsibility means nothing when your town’s economy is built on sunburns and fried clams. He’s the man in the middle. Not rich, not poor. Not a sea dog, not a scientist. Just a guy with a badge and a conscience, trapped between two forces louder and more certain than him. Watch him on that boat—swabbing, second-guessing, chain-smoking his stress. He’s the reluctant centre of a tug-of-war between experience and education, brawn and brain.

Then there’s Hooper—young, wired, arrogant. He’s got sonar, flares, and a boat that cost more than your house. He’s used to talking over people, used to being right. But he’s also deeply, emotionally rattled by what’s happening. A kid who loved the sea until it bit back. You can see it in that moment he stares into the opened belly of a tiger shark and realises the real killer is still out there. Hooper’s got money, but no armour. He’s the progressive in a world that doesn’t care about your degrees when the water turns red.

And Quint—ah, Quint. Salt-crusted, sunburnt, drunk on both whiskey and war trauma. He’s the last of a dying breed: the self-made man who doesn’t trust institutions, technology, or rich kids with soft hands. He’s got scars—literal and metaphorical. His monologue about the USS Indianapolis isn’t just a great scene; it’s the soul of the movie. The war shaped him, spat him back, and now he hunts sharks the way some men hunt ghosts. He’s not fighting just a fish—he’s fighting death itself, with a smirk and a machete.

Put these three together on a boat, and what you get isn’t just tension. You get a class war. Old money vs. old trauma. The system vs. the sea. Intellectualism vs. instinct. Spielberg knew exactly what he was doing here—this wasn’t just a monster movie, it was a chamber piece in saltwater. The shark? Just the trigger. The real horror is watching these men unravel—respect each other, resent each other, and finally, get ripped apart by the very thing they were trying to control.

By the time Quint’s blood paints the deck, it’s not just a death—it’s a eulogy for an entire generation of men who thought they could conquer the wild with nothing but grit. Hooper survives, but barely, and only by going under. Brody survives too, but you can see the price in his silence as he paddles away on the wreckage of the Orca. They both live, but the myth of masculinity—stoic, self-reliant, invincible—sinks to the bottom with the shark.

Fifty years on, this triptych of men feels even more vital. Not because it tells us who we should be, but because it shows us what happens when we try to be it all at once. The protector, the thinker, the killer. We saw ourselves in these three. And we watched what the ocean did to them.

Spoiler: the ocean won.

  • Saul Muerte

3. “When the Shark Never Died: Jaws and the Birth of the Franchise Machine”

19 Thursday Jun 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

The shark exploded. Literally. A scuba tank to the gut and a chunk of ocean sky lit up like the Fourth of July. Boom. Done. Fade to black. But of course, it wasn’t done.

Because Jaws didn’t just launch a blockbuster—it launched a beast. Not the kind with fins and teeth, but the kind that lives in boardrooms. The kind that smells profit in blood and doesn’t care who bleeds next.

Spielberg walked away. Smart move. He knew he’d pushed his luck once and nearly drowned doing it. But the studio? They smelled money—hot, salty, mid-’70s Americana money. Jaws made $100 million faster than any film before it. And when a monster does that, you don’t bury it. You build a theme park around it. You crank out sequels. You slap its name on lunchboxes, novelisations, jigsaw puzzles, Atari cartridges, and eventually, straight-to-cable sludge.

And so the shark came back. Again and again. Jaws 2 (not terrible, just toothless), Jaws 3-D (aka the fish tank screensaver from hell), and finally Jaws: The Revenge—a film so apocalyptically stupid it made Plan 9 from Outer Space look like Citizen Kane. This was where things got unhinged. The shark follows the Brody family from Amity to the Bahamas. It growls. It explodes in slow motion. It holds grudges. Somewhere, Moby Dick is rolling his eyes.

But here’s the rub: Jaws didn’t just franchise itself—it birthed the very concept of franchise-as-strategy. Before this, sequels were an afterthought, a maybe, a footnote. After Jaws, they became the plan. The future. The business model.

Studios started greenlighting entire trilogies before cameras rolled on the first frame. Intellectual property (IP) became the new oil, mined from the bones of old ideas. If it had a logo, it had legs. Star Wars, Rocky, Halloween, Alien—all in the wake of that fin cutting through the water. And that legacy only grew more grotesque in the 2000s. Prequels, reboots, cinematic universes. Every monster has a cousin. Every killer has an origin story. Every shark gets a spinoff.

You can see the DNA of Jaws in Jurassic Park, Pirates of the Caribbean, even Marvel. Big beast. Bigger box office. Bigger merchandising rollout. Spielberg didn’t just direct Jaws—he accidentally wrote the modern studio playbook, and then tried to outrun it.

And yet… through all the corporate feeding frenzy, the original remains untouched. Untarnished. Somehow, despite the cash-ins and copycats, Jaws still feels singular. A freak accident. A masterpiece birthed from chaos, not commerce. And maybe that’s why the shark never really died—because we keep coming back, not for the sequels or the plastic toys, but for the feeling. The quiet before the scream. The thrum of danger just beneath the surface. The electricity of a movie that didn’t know what it was until it was finished—and then couldn’t be replicated.

Franchise culture may have chummed the waters, but Jaws still swims alone.

  • Saul Muerte

2. “Out of Sight, Into Terror: Jaws as the Accidental Masterclass in Minimalist Horror”

19 Thursday Jun 2025

Posted by surgeons of horror in retrospective

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

jaws, Killer shark, lorraine gray, Richard Dreyfus, Robert Shaw, Roy Scheider, shark movies, Steven Spielberg

Here’s the thing about the shark: it barely worked.

It sank. It stalled. It glitched and groaned and refused to cooperate. Nicknamed “Bruce” on set, the beast spent more time in dry dock than terrorising the screen. Spielberg was 26, sleep-deprived, in over his head, and rapidly learning the only thing scarier than a killer shark was a Universal executive demanding to know why the footage still wasn’t usable.

And somehow, that mechanical failure became a cinematic miracle.

Because what Spielberg did—what Jaws did—was weaponise absence. The shark, originally meant to be front and centre, became a whisper in the dark. A shape beneath the surface. A disturbance in the rhythm of things. You didn’t see it. You sensed it. And that, it turns out, is the oldest, darkest trick in the horror book.

The great lie of movie monsters is that we want to see them. We don’t. Not really. We want to imagine them. The moment you put teeth on screen, you give the audience a sense of control. You label the fear. Spielberg yanked that control away. With John Williams’ pulsing two-note theme doing all the heavy lifting, he transformed absence into dread. The water itself became the monster.

It was Hitchcock’s Psycho shower scene stretched over two hours—and soaked in salt. This wasn’t just an accident. It was an evolution.

The lineage is everywhere. Fast forward to 1999 and you’ve got The Blair Witch Project freaking people out with sticks and sobbing. Paranormal Activity builds its terror from night-vision nothingness. It Follows delivers slow, patient doom from offscreen threats. Even Ari Aster plays coy with his demons, knowing full well that what you don’t see can stick in the brain far longer than anything prosthetic or CGI.

But Jaws did it first—because it had no other choice. And that’s what makes it genius. The ocean becomes a canvas of paranoia. The camera lingers on legs dangling from piers, swimmers bobbing like bait, empty stretches of sea humming with invisible menace. You start scanning the horizon like your life depends on it. Spielberg took a broken prop and turned it into a philosophy: less is fear.

What’s wild is how this “restraint” has been almost entirely misunderstood by Hollywood ever since. In the years that followed, the pendulum swung back to spectacle. Bigger sharks, bigger blood, more teeth, more tech. Sequels gave us full-frontal fish. Other monster movies mistook visibility for effectiveness. But the terror in Jaws came from its limits. The scariest monster in movie history only appears on screen for about four minutes. And that’s all it needed.

Because fear, real fear, comes not from what’s in front of you—but what’s lurking just out of view. It’s the ripple. The shadow. The dark shape sliding silently beneath your feet.

And in that space—between the surface and the scream—Jaws lives on.

  • Saul Muerte
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016

Categories

  • A Night of Horror Film Festival
  • Alien franchise
  • Alliance Francaise French Film Festival
  • Australian Horror
  • Best Movies and Shows
  • Competition
  • dark nights film fest
  • episode review
  • Flashback Fridays
  • Friday the 13th Franchise
  • Full Moon Sessions
  • Halloween franchise
  • In Memorium
  • Interview
  • japanese film festival
  • John Carpenter
  • killer pigs
  • midwest weirdfest
  • MidWest WierdFest
  • MonsterFest
  • movie article
  • movie of the week
  • Movie review
  • New Trailer
  • News article
  • podcast episode
  • podcast review
  • press release
  • retrospective
  • Rialto Distribution
  • Ring Franchise
  • series review
  • Spanish horror
  • sydney film festival
  • Sydney Underground Film Festival
  • The Blair Witch Franchise
  • the conjuring franchise
  • The Exorcist
  • The Howling franchise
  • Top 10 list
  • Top 12 List
  • top 13 films
  • Trash Night Tuesdays on Tubi
  • umbrella entertainment
  • Uncategorized
  • Universal Horror
  • Wes Craven
  • wes craven's the scream years

Meta

  • Create account
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Surgeons of Horror
    • Join 228 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Surgeons of Horror
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar