, , , , , ,

STRANGER IN OUR HOUSE WOULD BE Wes Craven’s third film as director and his first outing into the television arena.

This would allow Craven to be exposed to a more professional crew and access to equipment that he hadn’t had the privilege to use before such as a dolly.
It would also be the first time that he shot anything on 35mm.

Craven would use this valuable experience to his advantage, soaking up as much knowledge that he could muster.

Part of that experience would be to work with more known actors, among them was Linda Blair, who had just come out of rehab.

Blair was struggling on the social scene and despite still working in the movie industry, Stranger In Our House would be the last TV movie that she would be involved with.

Blair’s performance in this movie wouldn’t exactly turn heads but she definitely holds her own as Rachel Bryant, an All-American-Girl with a love of riding horses and is dating the local stud, Brad.

Her wholesome life is turned upside down however, when her long lost cousin, Julia comes to stay with them after her parents were tragically killed in an automobile accident.

But Julia (played by Lee Purcell in a noteworthy performance) is not all she appears to be.
Over time, Julia turns the tables into her favour and appears to have all the men waiting on her hand and foot.

Who is this Julia really?

What spell does she hold over the men of the town?

Is witchcraft be involved?

Sure this film is a TV movie and certainly has that feel about it when viewing. The make up and visual effects border on B-Movie style, but some of that lends to its appeal.

It certainly isn’t one of Craven’s finest entries to is resume but it’s certainly watchable and the 35% rating on Rotten Tomatoes is a slightly tougher mark than this film probably deserves.

Check out the surgeons of horror podcast below for more thoughts and views.


Also available in iTunes.

– Paul Farrell