Tag Archives: wolf

The Many Faces of The Wolf Man: A Legacy of Lycanthropy

10 Friday Jan 2025

Posted by in movie article

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

As Leigh Whannell prepares to unleash his vision of Wolf Man on modern audiences, it’s worth reflecting on the cinematic journey of one of horror’s most iconic monsters. The Wolf Man has prowled across the decades, transforming with the times while maintaining his primal appeal. From the tragic figure of the 1941 classic to the varied reimaginings that followed, the legacy of the Wolf Man is a fascinating study in reinvention.

The Birth of a Legend: Lon Chaney Jr. and Universal’s Classic Era
The Wolf Man’s journey began in 1941, with Lon Chaney Jr. donning the iconic fur in Universal’s The Wolf Man. Directed by George Waggner and written by Curt Siodmak, the film introduced audiences to Larry Talbot, a sympathetic protagonist cursed to transform into a werewolf under the full moon. Chaney’s portrayal of Talbot’s anguish gave the film its heart, and Jack Pierce’s groundbreaking makeup solidified the character’s image.

The success of The Wolf Man led to three sequels: Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man (1943), House of Frankenstein (1944), and House of Dracula (1945). These films further developed Talbot’s tragic arc, weaving his story into Universal’s monster crossover universe. Each sequel reinforced the character’s dual nature: a man tormented by his monstrous alter ego.

A Lighter Touch: Abbott and Costello and the Wolf Man
By 1948, the Wolf Man had taken on a comedic edge, appearing alongside Frankenstein’s Monster and Dracula in Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein. Chaney reprised his role, playing Talbot as the straight man amidst the comedic chaos. The film’s success demonstrated the character’s flexibility, capable of navigating both horror and humour.

Unexpected Turns: Alvin and the Chipmunks, Van Helsing, and Beyond
Over the years, the Wolf Man’s influence extended into unexpected territory. He howled his way into pop culture parodies like Alvin and the Chipmunks Meet the Wolfman (2000), where the character’s legacy was reimagined for younger audiences.

In Stephen Sommers’ Van Helsing (2004), the Wolf Man returned to his monstrous roots, albeit with a modern action-horror twist. This iteration leaned into the creature’s ferocity, pitting him against Dracula and showcasing a more physically imposing design.

Another notable homage came with House of the Wolf Man (2009), an independent film that sought to recapture the spirit of Universal’s golden age. The film’s black-and-white aesthetic and classic monster vibes paid loving tribute to the Wolf Man’s origins.

The Modern Wolf: Benicio Del Toro in The Wolfman
In 2010, Universal attempted to revitalise their iconic character with The Wolfman, starring Benicio Del Toro as Lawrence Talbot. Directed by Joe Johnston, the film embraced the gothic atmosphere of the original while updating the story with modern effects. Despite mixed reviews, Del Toro’s brooding performance and Rick Baker’s Oscar-winning makeup honoured the character’s tragic essence.

A New Moon Rises: Leigh Whannell’s Vision
As we look ahead to Leigh Whannell’s upcoming Wolf Man, there’s excitement in seeing how this legendary figure will be reimagined for a new era. Whannell’s track record with The Invisible Man (2020) suggests a fresh, psychological approach to the tale, potentially emphasising themes of isolation, inner turmoil, and the beast within.

A Legacy of Transformation
From Lon Chaney Jr.’s mournful Larry Talbot to Benicio Del Toro’s tortured Lawrence, the Wolf Man’s enduring appeal lies in his duality. He is both victim and villain, embodying the eternal struggle between man and monster. Over the decades, this tragic figure has adapted to reflect the fears and sensibilities of each generation, ensuring his place among the pantheon of cinematic monsters.

Whannell’s Wolf Man will undoubtedly add a new chapter to this storied legacy. Whether it will embrace the past, forge a new path, or find a balance between the two, one thing is certain: the howl of the Wolf Man will continue to echo across the ages.

  • Saul Muerte

A Howl of Sophistication: Revisiting Wolf (1994)

16 Monday Dec 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

Mike Nichols’ Wolf offers a refreshingly mature and layered take on the werewolf mythos, eschewing the usual gore-laden spectacle for a story steeped in psychological tension, power dynamics, and human frailty. Released in 1994, this film remains a unique entry in the genre, owing much to its stellar cast and Nichols’ seasoned direction.

Jack Nicholson commands the screen as Will Randall, a middle-aged book editor whose life takes a supernatural turn after a wolf bite. Nicholson’s performance brims with subtle menace, capturing Will’s transformation with restraint and depth. It’s a testament to his range that he can imbue the character with both primal ferocity and wry charm, making this a werewolf we root for as much as we fear.

Michelle Pfeiffer is magnetic as Laura Alden, bringing a sharp wit and vulnerability to her role as the love interest caught in the storm of Will’s transformation. Her chemistry with Nicholson elevates the film, adding a touch of sensuality to the story. James Spader delivers a delightfully slimy performance as Stewart Swinton, Will’s duplicitous protégé whose ambition sets him on a collision course with his boss. Christopher Plummer’s turn as the calculating Raymond Alden rounds out the cast, his gravitas lending weight to the corporate intrigue that simmers beneath the surface.

Nichols approaches the age-old tale of lycanthropy with a refined touch, framing the werewolf curse as an allegory for midlife crises and primal urges buried beneath layers of societal decorum. The film’s central themes of power, betrayal, and rediscovery are enhanced by its corporate setting, where the hunt for dominance plays out not in forests but in boardrooms.

The cinematography by Giuseppe Rotunno is striking, particularly the way he uses shadow and light to emphasise Will’s growing connection to the animal within. Ennio Morricone’s score complements the mood perfectly, adding an eerie elegance to the proceedings.

However, Wolf is not without its shortcomings. The pacing falters at times, and the climactic showdown, while entertaining, leans into genre tropes that feel at odds with the film’s otherwise restrained tone. Additionally, the film’s blend of horror and drama doesn’t always coalesce seamlessly, leaving some moments feeling disjointed.

Despite these flaws, Wolf remains a compelling and underappreciated gem. It’s a film that dares to take a sophisticated approach to a well-trodden myth, exploring the beast within with intelligence and style. For fans of Nicholson, Pfeiffer, or anyone seeking a thoughtful twist on werewolf lore, Wolf still has plenty of bite.

  • Saul Muerte

La Loba (1965): A Howling Tale of Female Power in Mexican Horror’s Golden Era

07 Saturday Sep 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

Mexican cinema has a long and rich tradition of genre films, especially within the realm of horror. From the early days of celluloid, Mexican filmmakers have embraced the macabre, drawing on a rich cultural tapestry of folklore and superstition to create uniquely haunting tales. La Loba (1965) is a film that continues this tradition, though it does so with a particular focus on a female antagonist—a rarity in the male-dominated world of horror cinema at the time. While not a masterpiece, La Loba offers an intriguing glimpse into the evolving landscape of Mexican genre films, and the power of a female lead who embodies both terror and tragedy.

Directed by Rafael Baledón, La Loba is a werewolf tale with a twist. It tells the story of Clarisa (Kitty de Hoyos), a woman cursed with the ability to transform into a wolf. Her struggle with this dark gift is the driving force of the film, as she battles both the monstrous nature within her and the societal forces that seek to control her. Clarisa’s duality—her simultaneous victimhood and villainy—makes her a compelling character, and one that audiences can connect with on an emotional level.

Kitty de Hoyos’ performance as Clarisa is the film’s standout element. She imbues the character with a sense of vulnerability that is rare in horror antagonists, particularly those of the era. Clarisa’s curse is portrayed not just as a physical transformation, but as a deeply psychological burden that isolates her from the world. De Hoyos captures this inner turmoil with nuance, making Clarisa a character who is both feared and pitied.

The film’s focus on a female antagonist is notable within the context of Mexican horror, where women were often relegated to the roles of victims or secondary characters. La Loba breaks this mold by placing a woman at the center of the horror, not as a damsel in distress, but as the source of the terror itself. This inversion of traditional gender roles adds a layer of complexity to the narrative, making La Loba a film that resonates with contemporary audiences as well as those of its time.

However, despite its intriguing premise and strong central performance, La Loba falls short in several areas. The film’s pacing is uneven, with long stretches of exposition that slow down the narrative. The special effects, while ambitious, are dated even by 1960s standards, and the werewolf transformation scenes lack the impact that the story demands. Additionally, the film’s exploration of Clarisa’s inner conflict, while commendable, feels underdeveloped, leaving the audience wanting more depth and resolution.

That said, La Loba is still a significant entry in the canon of Mexican horror. It stands as a testament to the creativity and resourcefulness of Mexican filmmakers, who, despite limited budgets and resources, were able to craft films that left a lasting impact on the genre. La Loba may not be the most polished or frightening werewolf film, but it is a film that dares to tell a different kind of story—one that places a woman’s experience at the forefront of the horror.

The film also fits into a broader movement within Mexican genre cinema during the 1960s, a time when filmmakers were pushing the boundaries of what horror could be. Films like El Espejo de la Bruja (1962) and El Vampiro (1957) laid the groundwork for this exploration of psychological and supernatural horror, and La Loba continues in this vein, albeit with a more intimate, character-driven focus.

The Prognosis:

La Loba earns its place in the pantheon of Mexican horror not for its scares, but for its willingness to explore the complexities of its female lead. It’s a film that reflects the evolving role of women in horror, both on and off the screen, and it remains a fascinating piece of cinematic history. For fans of Mexican horror and those interested in the genre’s treatment of female characters, La Loba is a film worth revisiting.

  • Saul Muerte

Movie review: Wolfkin (2023)

09 Wednesday Aug 2023

Posted by in Movie review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

I’ve always been lured in to lycanthrope movies, perhaps because they generally arc back to a tormented soul, cursed by a torturous, shape-shifting, life-altering event that threatens to rip apart the physical self in order to destroy the last ebbs of humanity.

So, upon hearing that Luxembourger film director, Jacques Molitar was offering up a fresh slice of the werewolf folk story, I was gripped with eager anticipation.

Elaine (Louise Manteau) is a single mother, following the disappearance of the father after a naked romp during the films prologue (typical guy, right?)

Cut to 8 years or so later, and Elaine’s son, Martin, is starting to present some unusual physical and psychological traits that lead him to biting a schoolfriend. Shocked and ashamed, Elaine intends to find out the root cause of this odd behaviour and heads back to the paternal grandparents in search for answers, who I might add are significantly well off, casting an automatic divide that juxtaposes the rough suburban lifestyle that Elaine and Martin have been living.

When she gets there though, there are some curious happenings which raise further questions and family secrets that she may have wished remained buried. Elaine must then decide which path her son should take in order for him to survive in the real world.

The Prognosis:

Whilst Wolfkin does boast some decent practical effects, this is a slowburn story that does little when it tries to finally ignite.

Where Let The Right One In and The Hatching (both movie which it has been likened to in promotions) have depth and tension to fill the void, Wolfkin simmers along with plenty to say but little impact in the way that it’s presented.

Hats off to Molitar for attempting to take an age-old tale into a new direction but it ultimately lacked enough bit to sink your teeth into.

– Saul Muerte

Wolfkin is currently available on DVD and Digital platforms.

Retrospective: Wolfen (1981)

24 Saturday Jul 2021

Posted by in retrospective

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , ,

1981 proved to be big hitters for wolf kind with three notable films leaning into the subject in their own unique way.
While most people will have heard of John Landis’ An American Werewolf in London for its broad strokes of horror blended with comedy and creature fx, or Joe Dante’s The Howling for its pulpy investigative tale of lycanthropy, but the third feature among the group, Wolfen starring Albert Finney may not readily spring to mind.

Possibly this is because the nature of the film doesn’t play with the true mythology surrounding werewolves, but rather that of an American Indian legend based on wolf spirits.

The film also plays with the ‘whodunnit’ detective story, following Finney’s Detective Dewey Wilson, who is called back into the police force when a high profile murder warrants a guru to put a final stop to the murders that have been taking place throughout New York. The victims who have the common traits of supposed animal attacks at its core. 

Wilson is teamed up with criminal psychologist, Detective Rebecca Neff (Diane Venora) in a partnership that has all the hallmarks of an early Mulder and Scully vibe. Neff’s insights into the science and animalistic behaviour evidenced at the muder scene, helps to solidify their enquiry.

Early on in the piece, the pair are attacked by an unseen creature, barely surviving their ordeal at an abandoned church, which forms a tighter bond and highlights that their investigations have something more paranormal in origin.

The remainder of the film plays with the spiritual side of nature, suggesting that despite the hallmarks of a potential terrorist activity behind the murders, that there is a pack of God-like beings with wolf traits known as spirits or shapeshifters are the true cause. It is this angle that definitely sets it apart from AAWIL and The Howling, and possibly why it didn’t manage to make its mark in comparison. It’s a shame because the psychological component that is played with as a humanity versus nature, and our base animalistic behaviour that is drawn upon for survival is one that is deeply compelling and told in an engaging way, supported by the strong performances on show by Finney. Detective Dewey is a great character and one that Dustin Hoffman had his eyes on at one stage, which says a lot to his appeal and strength. As is the other cast members, Edward James Olmos, Gregory Hines, Tom Noonan, all of whom provide compelling characters to support the narrative.

It also boasted at the time a refreshing approach to the killer’s perspective using a thermography technique, now closely associated with films like Predator. 

Sure it doesn’t have the same fanfare as the other werewolf flicks that year, but it had a strong, mature approach to its storytelling that shouldn’t be neglected.

  • Saul Muerte