Tag Archives: peter cushing

The Gorgon (1964): Hammer’s Ambitious but Imperfect Gothic Tale

10 Saturday Aug 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

Hammer Films’ The Gorgon (1964) stands as a notable entry in the studio’s prolific output, featuring the legendary trio of Peter Cushing, Christopher Lee, and Barbara Shelley. Directed by Terence Fisher, this film had all the makings of a classic Hammer horror, yet it fell short of its full potential. Despite its flaws, The Gorgon remains an enjoyable feature and a must-watch for fans of the iconic British horror production company.

The story revolves around a small European village plagued by a series of mysterious deaths, all seemingly linked to the mythical gorgon Megaera. Screenwriter John Gilling crafted a compelling script that promised a rich blend of Gothic horror and mythological intrigue. However, Gilling’s satisfaction with his script was tempered by disappointment when significant portions were cut from the final version, diluting the narrative’s depth and impact.

Barbara Shelley, cast in the dual role of Carla and Megaera, was particularly disheartened by the decision to reduce her involvement. Originally intended to portray both the innocent Carla and her monstrous alter ego, Shelley believed that this dual role could have elevated The Gorgon to one of the best Gothic films ever made. Unfortunately, the role of Megaera was reassigned to Prudence Hyman to prevent prematurely revealing the story’s outcome, a choice that Shelley felt undermined the film’s potential.

Under Terence Fisher’s direction, the film benefited from his seasoned expertise in crafting atmospheric horror. Fisher’s collaboration with Cushing, Lee, and Shelley promised a cinematic experience that embodied the essence of Hammer Films. Cushing and Lee, as always, delivered magnificent performances, with Cushing playing the determined Dr. Namaroff and Lee as the insightful Professor Meister. Shelley’s portrayal of Carla added a layer of vulnerability and complexity to the narrative.

Despite these strong elements, The Gorgon struggled to connect with audiences. The film’s pacing issues, coupled with the aforementioned script cuts, resulted in a disjointed story that failed to fully capitalize on its intriguing premise. Additionally, the special effects, particularly the portrayal of Megaera, did not meet the high standards set by other Hammer productions, further impacting the film’s reception.

The Prognosis:

The Gorgon is a mixed bag—a film that showcases Hammer’s strengths while also highlighting some of its weaknesses. It’s an enjoyable feature that offers glimpses of what could have been a masterpiece. For fans of Hammer Films and classic Gothic horror, it remains a worthwhile watch, if only to appreciate the performances of Cushing, Lee, and Shelley, and to ponder the film that might have been.

Rating: ★★★☆☆

Revisiting The Evil of Frankenstein (1964): A Visual Feast Undermined by a Weak Script

08 Thursday Aug 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

In the annals of Hammer Films’ storied Frankenstein series, The Evil of Frankenstein (1964) holds a unique yet somewhat controversial place. Directed by Freddie Francis, who was rising as a notable figure behind the camera, this film brought a fresh visual style that showcased his expertise in cinematography. Despite its aesthetic triumphs, the film struggled to captivate audiences and critics alike, often regarded as the weaker entry in the Hammer Frankenstein saga.

Freddie Francis, known for his distinguished work as a cinematographer, brought an unparalleled visual flair to The Evil of Frankenstein. His directorial approach was marked by a keen eye for composition and lighting, elements that elevated the film’s atmosphere. Francis’s insistence on an elaborate laboratory set was a testament to his commitment to creating a visually compelling environment. The laboratory, with its intricate details and Gothic grandeur, became a highlight of the film, reflecting the meticulous craftsmanship behind the scenes.

Peter Cushing reprised his iconic role as Baron Frankenstein with his usual dedication and intensity. Known for his commitment to performing his own stunts, Cushing’s involvement in the film’s climactic finale was particularly noteworthy. The scene where he swung into the burning laboratory was not without consequence, reportedly resulting in third-degree burns for the veteran actor. Cushing’s performance, marked by his characteristic blend of charm and menace, remained a strong point even as the film faltered in other areas.

A significant aspect of The Evil of Frankenstein was its association with Universal Pictures. This partnership allowed Hammer Films to utilize elements from Universal’s classic Frankenstein series, including the iconic monster design. While this brought a sense of legitimacy and continuity, it also highlighted the film’s struggles to carve out its own identity. The reliance on established tropes and visual cues from Universal’s Frankenstein films, while nostalgic, often felt like a retread rather than a reinvention.

Despite these promising elements, The Evil of Frankenstein ultimately stumbled due to its weak script. The narrative lacked the depth and intrigue that characterized the earlier entries in the series, resulting in a disjointed and uninspired story. The film’s reception reflected this, with audiences and critics finding it a lackluster addition to the Frankenstein mythos. Its poor performance at the box office further cemented its reputation as a misstep for Hammer Films.

The Prognosis:

The Evil of Frankenstein remains a visually stunning yet narratively flawed entry in the Hammer Frankenstein series. Freddie Francis’s directorial prowess and Peter Cushing’s unwavering dedication brought moments of brilliance, but these were not enough to overcome the shortcomings of the script. While it may not stand as a pinnacle of Hammer’s horror legacy, it serves as a testament to the creative risks and collaborations that defined the studio’s golden era.

  • Saul Muerte

Retrospective: From Beyond The Grave (1974)

25 Tuesday Jun 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

From Beyond the Grave (1974) is an anthology horror film produced by Amicus Productions and directed by Kevin Connor. It features a series of macabre tales linked by an antique shop run by Peter Cushing’s enigmatic proprietor. While the film showcases the hallmark traits of Amicus’s anthology style and benefits from Milton Subotsky’s vision, it falls short of achieving the lasting impact of some of its predecessors. This retrospective review will examine the film’s place in the horror anthology subgenre, the effective production work of Amicus Productions, and the influence of producer Milton Subotsky.

Horror anthologies have a unique appeal, offering audiences multiple stories within a single film. From Beyond the Grave adheres to this format, presenting four distinct tales of supernatural and psychological horror. Each segment explores different themes and horror elements, ranging from cursed objects to malevolent spirits. This variety can be a double-edged sword: while it provides a diverse viewing experience, it can also lead to uneven storytelling and inconsistent scares.

In the context of horror anthologies, From Beyond the Grave stands as a competent but not groundbreaking example. The segments vary in quality, with some delivering genuine chills and others feeling formulaic. The anthology format allows for a quick pace and frequent shifts in tone, but this also prevents any single story from achieving the depth and development of a standalone feature. Compared to earlier Amicus anthologies like Tales from the Crypt (1972), From Beyond the Grave lacks the same level of memorable horror moments and narrative cohesion.

Amicus Productions, known for its series of horror anthologies throughout the 1960s and 1970s, brings its trademark style to From Beyond the Grave. The film benefits from high production values, with well-designed sets, atmospheric cinematography, and effective use of practical effects. The antique shop setting serves as a compelling and eerie backdrop, providing a unifying thread for the disparate stories.

The film features a strong cast, including horror veterans such as Peter Cushing, David Warner, and Donald Pleasence. Their performances add gravitas and credibility to the stories, even when the scripts fall into predictable territory. Cushing, in particular, excels as the mysterious shopkeeper, imbuing the character with a sinister charm that anchors the film.

Despite these strengths, the production occasionally feels constrained by budgetary limitations. Some segments lack the polish and imaginative flair that could have elevated them, resulting in a final product that, while competent, doesn’t fully capitalize on its potential.

Milton Subotsky, co-founder of Amicus Productions, was instrumental in shaping the company’s horror anthology format. His vision for From Beyond the Grave is evident in the film’s structure and style. Subotsky’s influence ensures that each story adheres to a tight, episodic format, with a clear beginning, middle, and end.

Subotsky’s preference for blending supernatural horror with psychological elements is also apparent. The stories often explore themes of guilt, retribution, and the consequences of one’s actions, aligning with Subotsky’s penchant for morality tales. However, this approach can sometimes lead to predictable plot twists and moralistic conclusions, reducing the overall impact of the horror elements.

While Subotsky’s vision brings coherence to the film, it also reveals some of its limitations. The anthology format, while effective in providing variety, can feel repetitive when each story follows a similar moralistic pattern. This repetition diminishes the sense of surprise and suspense, key components of effective horror.

The Prognosis:

From Beyond the Grave (1974) is a solid but unremarkable entry in the horror anthology subgenre. It showcases the strengths of Amicus Productions, including effective production work and strong performances, particularly from Peter Cushing. However, the film’s impact is diluted by uneven storytelling and predictable narrative structures. Milton Subotsky’s vision provides coherence and thematic consistency, but it also imposes limitations that prevent the film from achieving the lasting impact of more innovative horror anthologies. For fans of classic horror and anthology films, From Beyond the Grave offers a competent, if not exceptional, viewing experience.

  • Saul Muerte

Captain Clegg (Night Creatures): A Haunting Departure from Hammer’s Traditional Horror

13 Thursday Jun 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , ,

Released in 1962, Hammer Film Productions’ Captain Clegg (also known as Night Creatures) stands as a unique entry in the studio’s illustrious catalogue. Known primarily for their gothic horror films featuring iconic monsters like Dracula, Frankenstein’s creature, and the Mummy, Hammer took a fascinating detour with Captain Clegg, blending swashbuckling adventure with eerie, supernatural elements. This film, while not as instantly recognizable as Hammer’s monster features, is a testament to the studio’s versatility and creativity.

A Departure from Gothic Horror

Captain Clegg deviates from the typical gothic imagery and dark castle settings that defined Hammer’s earlier successes. Instead, it transports viewers to the windswept marshes and coastal villages of 18th century England, a setting more commonly associated with pirate tales than horror stories. This shift in scenery alone sets the film apart, offering a fresh visual palette and a different kind of atmospheric tension.

The film’s plot centers around the enigmatic Reverend Doctor Blyss (Peter Cushing), who harbors a dark secret. By day, he is the respected leader of a quiet coastal village, but by night, he is the infamous pirate Captain Clegg. The arrival of Captain Collier (Patrick Allen) and his band of naval officers to investigate reports of smuggling brings tension and suspense, as Blyss must outwit his adversaries while maintaining his façade.

Blending Pirates with Haunting Mystique

Despite the absence of Hammer’s traditional monsters, Captain Clegg infuses its pirate story with haunting and supernatural undertones. The eerie marsh phantoms—glowing skeletons that ride ghostly horses—create a chilling atmosphere reminiscent of Hammer’s more conventional horror elements. These spectral figures are used to great effect, not just to frighten, but to underscore the film’s themes of deception and hidden identities.

Peter Cushing’s performance is central to the film’s success. As Blyss/Clegg, he masterfully balances charm and menace, embodying a character who is both sympathetic and fearsome. Cushing’s portrayal adds depth to the narrative, highlighting the duality of his character and the thin line between hero and villain.

The film also delves into themes of justice and retribution. Clegg’s transformation from a feared pirate to a community leader reflects a complex moral landscape, where redemption is pursued through dubious means. This moral ambiguity adds a layer of sophistication to the story, elevating it beyond a simple tale of good versus evil.

Atmosphere and Cinematography

The cinematography of Captain Clegg further distinguishes it from Hammer’s earlier works. The film makes excellent use of its coastal setting, with expansive shots of the marshes creating a sense of isolation and foreboding. The nighttime scenes, in particular, are beautifully crafted, using shadows and fog to evoke a ghostly ambiance that complements the film’s supernatural elements.

Director Peter Graham Scott effectively balances action and suspense, ensuring that the film’s pace remains engaging. The sequences involving the marsh phantoms are particularly well-executed, blending practical effects and atmospheric cinematography to create genuinely unsettling moments.

The Prognosis:

Captain Clegg (or Night Creatures) stands out in Hammer Film Productions’ oeuvre as a unique and engaging blend of pirate adventure and supernatural horror. While it may lack the instantly recognizable imagery of the studio’s gothic classics, it compensates with a richly atmospheric setting, complex characters, and a compelling narrative. Peter Cushing’s standout performance and the film’s haunting undertones ensure that Captain Clegg remains a memorable and distinctive entry in Hammer’s filmography. This film is a testament to Hammer’s ability to innovate and experiment within the horror genre, offering audiences a thrilling departure from their traditional fare.

  • Saul Muerte

1960s Horror Retrospective: The Brides of Dracula (1960)

26 Friday Apr 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , ,

As the horror scene began to ramp up in the 1960s and shake the genre to the core with the likes of Psycho and Peeping Tom, British Horror production company, Hammer Films who had made a significant mark during the mid-fifties reinventing classic Universal horror movies such as The Curse of Frankenstein; The Mummy; and Dracula were hardly resting on their laurels or cast to the shadows. At least not yet. Having already brought Baron Frankenstein to the screen with a sequel entitled The Revenge of Frankenstein, Hammer would inevitably turn their attention to the prince of darkness, although curiously, despite Christopher Lee still being attached to the Production company, and a script under the title Dracula the Damned in the works, this idea was shelved in favour of a whole new direction without Lee attached.

The sequel initially under the working title, Disciple of Dracula would centre around another vampire called Baron Meinster. At the outset this script would have another hero in mind called Latour to deal with the Baron but he would soon be curtailed in favour of bringing back Peter Cushing to play the infamous vampire hunter, Van Helsing. This was not an easy task however as Cushing was not immediately enlightened by the script on offer, so another writer, Edward Percy was called in to redraft it before he would sign on the dotted line.

The female lead, Marianne Danielle would be presented to Yvonne Monlaur to play opposite David Peel as Baron Meinster. Amongst the cast would be Freda Jackson (Henry V; David Lean’s Great Expectations) and Maritita Hunt (also Great Expectations as Miss Havisham) bringing an amount of gravitas to the presence on screen.

Once again the always reliable Terence Fisher was at the helm to call the shots and ensure that all things tied together neatly. It would be go-to editor James Needs though who would be congratulated for managing to ensure that the film would meet the deadline cast by Universal. The result would see huge success for The Brides of Dracula, especially in Japan, UK and the States and the thirst for more Dracula stories would be requested, which Hammer was all too keen to oblige. The synergy of all those involved meant that Hammer were at the peak of their success and the 60s would only produce more Gothic-infused horror.

– Saul Muerte

1960s Horror Retrospective

The Flesh and the Fiend

Eyes Without A Face

Peeping Tom

Psycho

1960s Horror Retrospective: The Flesh and the Fiends (1960)

20 Saturday Apr 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ 6 Comments

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Having journeyed through the rise and fall of Universal Classic Monsters during the early thirties and the passing of the baton to British Film production company Hammer Films in the mid-fifties, it’s time to switch my celluloid gaze upon the 1960s and the twists and turns that the decade would take in the name of horror. 

To begin, my focus falls upon a feature that at the time struggled to get deserved recognition, both in production and when it eventually hit the screens, but has since gone on to become a cult film in its own right.

Directed by John Gilling (who would go on to call the shots for a few Hammer Films later in the decade) The Flesh and the Fiends would be a re-working of a previous feature called The Greed of William Hart penned by Gilling, but suffered at the hands of the British Board of Film Censors. The request that all references to the real-life murderers, Burke and Hare be removed would be rectified for TFATF, with the opening title displaying, “”[this] is a story of vice and murder. We make no apologies to the dead. It is all true.” 

Based on the macabre events set in the 1820’s when the 19th Century medical doctor, Robert Knox would purchase corpses for medical purposes from the afore-mentioned Burke and Hare. Knox, brought to the screen by another Hammer alumni, fresh from his rise to fame as Doctor Frankenstein, Peter Cushing, who noted the similarities between Knox and the Baron, “The minds of these exceptional men were driven by a single desire: to inquire into the unknown. Ahead of their time, like most great scientists, their work and motives were misunderstood.”

Cushing was magnificent in this role, even going to significant measures to enact the same droopy eye that Knox bore from contracting smallpox when he was young. 

Cushing is not the only standout though as both Burke and Hare are magnificently portrayed by George Rose and Donald Pleasance, adding some offbeat humour amongst the gruesome scenes, especially in some of the murders that take place. The finest example of this coming when Burke (Rose) suffocates Aggie (Esme Cameron) while Hare (Pleasance) is dancing a jig, perfectly juxtaposing the brutality on show.

Cinematographer Monty Berman also provides some striking images, a master pf black and white photography, he managed to capture the dank and dismal scenes in 19th Century Edinburgh. This along with Gilling’s knack to take the action scenes by the horns with his own unique bruteish fashion, is one that left a compelling mark on the genre, kick-starting the decade in style. While it was impactful in British cinemas, it went without a trace Stateside and was considered a failure. It does deserve greater recognition, outshone as it was by the likes of Hammer’s style and substance, The Flesh and the Fiends, the mood of the piece was a grim and tormentous affair.

– Saul Muerte

Retrospective – The Mummy (1959)

24 Friday Feb 2023

Posted by in retrospective

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

Within the last three years of the 1950s, Hammer Films had reshaped the Universal Classic monsters canon with The Curse of Frankenstein, Dracula and The Revenge of Frankenstein, bringing into full glorious and gory colour for a then, modern audience, With it, Hammer would also unite one of celluloid history’s greatest co-stars in the horror genre in Peter Cushing and Sir Christopher Lee. Before the turn of the decade, the British production house would turn their attention to yet another Universal offering, The Mummy, and keep that winning formula of Cushing, Lee and film director Terence Fisher. Cushing played the dashing hero, and Lee subjected to the ‘monster’ character and hidden behind full make up for the last time with Hammer. It was a tortuous and gruelling affair for its two leads, and would lead Cushing to the hospital following a scene gone awry. Cushing would also become more bold in his acting choices and in cementing his character traits on screen and guiding his director in some of teh action sequences.

The familiar tale of the mummified High Priest Kharis (Lee) resurrected under the power of Mehemet Bey (George Pastell) to seek revenge for disturbing Princess Ananka’s tomb, is given the Hammer treatment. Here Cushing plays the part of John Banning, one of the doomed expedition crew. His father, Stephen (Felix Aylmer) has been driven mad and escorted to the asylum with his prophecies of the forthcoming mummy. Initially scoffed at and ridiculed, the subject takes a dark and sour turn when Stephen is killed by Kharis’ bandaged hands.

Kharis would also be moved by his lost love, Ananka, whose appearance is uncannily similar to John Banning’s wife, (Yvonne Furneaux) and thus brings about our damsel in distress theme.

Jimmy Sangster would once again herald the screenplay writing duties, fusing Universal’s The Mummy; The Mummy’s Tomb; and The Mummy’s Ghost to puff out his take on the story for Hammer. 

Upon its cinematic release, the name Hammer was starting to cause quite a stir among moviegoers, and The Mummy became a big success for the company. It even surpassed its successors in the box office and in some ways is a more solid feature in its narrative, and effects. Despite the climatic ending where Kharis played by go to stuntman Eddie Powell sinking into the depths of the quagmire, the British Film company was rising to new heights. And it was all in the name of horror.

  • Saul Muerte. 

Retrospective – The Hound of the Baskervilles (1958)

24 Friday Feb 2023

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Before Benedict Cumberbatch donned the deerstalker hat for Moffat and Gatiss’ modern interpretation of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s infamous detective, another British icon had made an impressionable mark for Hammer Film Productions’ The Hound of the Baskervilles. Having already portrayed literature icons Baron Frankenstein and Van Helsing, it was time to turn his head towards Sherlock Holmes for one of his greatest adventures. 

His Doctor Watson would be ably performed by Andre Morell (The Plague of Zombies) who himself would become a Hammer staple, but it would be the casting of Sir Chrisopher Lee as Sir Henry Baskervilles (once again unite Hammer’s most memorable duo on screen) in the first representation of the tale in colour surrounding the dreaded curse and the beast the walks the moors.

Hammer would look to sensationalise or create drama that was absent from the initial storyline, including the tarantula scene. Probably the hardest trick was to produce a larger than life hound for the film’s climax; a tough act considering Lee’s stature, but Hammer found their answer with a Great Dane called Colonel. 

It was initially conceived to be the gateway to many more Sherlock Holmes’ adaptations, but would be the only occurrence, much to the company and cinephiles’ dismay. It would have been interesting to see Cushing take on the role in numerous other stories. 

The great Terence Fisher who had stamped his signature vision; and one that became synonymous with the Hammer style with The Curse of Frankenstein and Dracula, would wield his take of the action from the Director’s chair. With the talent in front of the screen from which to mould the narrative, Fisher had created a feature that stands alongside these Gothic treatments that made Hammer Horror’s name, so it’s a shame that there weren’t more chances to delve within Conan Doyle’s world.

  • Saul Muerte

Retrospective: The Revenge of Frankenstein (1958)

13 Sunday Nov 2022

Posted by in retrospective

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

Hot off the tails of Hammer’s iconic release of Dracula aka Horror of Dracula, the British Film production company would look to follow up on the success of their other Gothic feature, The Curse of Frankenstein. That film as noted at the time had the titular Baron played by Peter Cushing (returning once more here) heading for the guillotine. His resurrection would be a simple enough with Frankenstein paying off his executioner and escaping to form an alternate identity as Dr. Victor Stein set up his own successful practice in Carlsbruck. His alias is soon uncovered however by fellow doctor and admirer of Frankenstein’s work, Hans Kleve (Francis Matthews). Hans teams up with Frankenstein, eager to learn his methods and the two set work in picking up where he last left off, with the creation of life.

As part of these scientific methods, Frankenstein is accompanied by a hunchback, Karl (Oscar Quitak) who volunteers his brain in the promise of a new body (Michael Gwynne). It wouldn’t be a Hammer film without its share of drama and conflict which comes at the hand of Karl being beaten by a janitor damaging his brain and transforming his personality into a cannibalistic, decaying frame. From here, Frankenstein’s demise is on the cards and the town will awaken to his dark deeds.

Despite having a rushed script, the final cut would do well for Hammer, pulling in enough income at the box office and would be commended for a well handled screenplay ably supported by Jack Asher’s cinematography along with Terence Fisher’s directing. This is Cushing’s film though and his poise and acidic portrayal is one that lifts The Revenge of Frankenstein marking a successful franchise return and arguably one that is seen by some as better than its predecessor.

– Saul Muerte

Retrospective: Dracula (1958)

06 Sunday Nov 2022

Posted by in retrospective

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

It’s 1958 and Hammer Films has slowly been making its mark on the horror celluloid scene, but they are about to cement their place forever with their iconic take on Bram Stoker’s Dracula as part of a deal between Seven Arts and Universal International. Iconic in that they would produce one of the most infamous images of the titular character thanks to the commanding presence of Christopher Lee. It would also see Lee don the fangs a total of seven times for Hammer, the last being The Satanic Rites of Dracula in 1973. His blood red eyes and performance as a sexual predator would set the image of modern Dracula up for life, but it would also be one that would irk Lee over time, becoming tiresome of the watered down versions he would ultimately play.

To add weight to the original feature (entitled The Horror of Dracula in the US as Universal wanted to distinguish the British version from their own 1931 feature starring Bela Lugosi), Hammer would cast Peter Cushing to play Dracula’s foe Van Helsing. A worthy and notable performance once again which would see Cushing insisting on performing his own stunts throughout.

It would once again herald Jimmy Sangster on writing duties, and the ever-dependable Terence Fisher in the directors chair following his success with The Curse of Frankenstein.

Upon review, the film still holds up well with solid performances throughout and the sexual undertone lays heavy with palettes of red, producing some well-handled effects. It’s also of note, the omission of key character Renfield from the novel, and the amalgamation of Jonathan Harker (John Van Eyssen) and Arthur Holmwood’s (Michael Gough) role in the storyline too.  

Upon release, the film did well despite heavy criticism from certain avenues of the media, dubbing the X certificate a pale option and cries for a new classification to be ordered. Either way it didn’t stop the punters from going to see it, and paved the bloody path for Hammer to walk along for another two decades.

– Saul Muerte