Tag Archives: Hammer Horror

The Gorgon (1964): Hammer’s Ambitious but Imperfect Gothic Tale

10 Saturday Aug 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

Hammer Films’ The Gorgon (1964) stands as a notable entry in the studio’s prolific output, featuring the legendary trio of Peter Cushing, Christopher Lee, and Barbara Shelley. Directed by Terence Fisher, this film had all the makings of a classic Hammer horror, yet it fell short of its full potential. Despite its flaws, The Gorgon remains an enjoyable feature and a must-watch for fans of the iconic British horror production company.

The story revolves around a small European village plagued by a series of mysterious deaths, all seemingly linked to the mythical gorgon Megaera. Screenwriter John Gilling crafted a compelling script that promised a rich blend of Gothic horror and mythological intrigue. However, Gilling’s satisfaction with his script was tempered by disappointment when significant portions were cut from the final version, diluting the narrative’s depth and impact.

Barbara Shelley, cast in the dual role of Carla and Megaera, was particularly disheartened by the decision to reduce her involvement. Originally intended to portray both the innocent Carla and her monstrous alter ego, Shelley believed that this dual role could have elevated The Gorgon to one of the best Gothic films ever made. Unfortunately, the role of Megaera was reassigned to Prudence Hyman to prevent prematurely revealing the story’s outcome, a choice that Shelley felt undermined the film’s potential.

Under Terence Fisher’s direction, the film benefited from his seasoned expertise in crafting atmospheric horror. Fisher’s collaboration with Cushing, Lee, and Shelley promised a cinematic experience that embodied the essence of Hammer Films. Cushing and Lee, as always, delivered magnificent performances, with Cushing playing the determined Dr. Namaroff and Lee as the insightful Professor Meister. Shelley’s portrayal of Carla added a layer of vulnerability and complexity to the narrative.

Despite these strong elements, The Gorgon struggled to connect with audiences. The film’s pacing issues, coupled with the aforementioned script cuts, resulted in a disjointed story that failed to fully capitalize on its intriguing premise. Additionally, the special effects, particularly the portrayal of Megaera, did not meet the high standards set by other Hammer productions, further impacting the film’s reception.

The Prognosis:

The Gorgon is a mixed bag—a film that showcases Hammer’s strengths while also highlighting some of its weaknesses. It’s an enjoyable feature that offers glimpses of what could have been a masterpiece. For fans of Hammer Films and classic Gothic horror, it remains a worthwhile watch, if only to appreciate the performances of Cushing, Lee, and Shelley, and to ponder the film that might have been.

Rating: ★★★☆☆

Revisiting The Evil of Frankenstein (1964): A Visual Feast Undermined by a Weak Script

08 Thursday Aug 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

In the annals of Hammer Films’ storied Frankenstein series, The Evil of Frankenstein (1964) holds a unique yet somewhat controversial place. Directed by Freddie Francis, who was rising as a notable figure behind the camera, this film brought a fresh visual style that showcased his expertise in cinematography. Despite its aesthetic triumphs, the film struggled to captivate audiences and critics alike, often regarded as the weaker entry in the Hammer Frankenstein saga.

Freddie Francis, known for his distinguished work as a cinematographer, brought an unparalleled visual flair to The Evil of Frankenstein. His directorial approach was marked by a keen eye for composition and lighting, elements that elevated the film’s atmosphere. Francis’s insistence on an elaborate laboratory set was a testament to his commitment to creating a visually compelling environment. The laboratory, with its intricate details and Gothic grandeur, became a highlight of the film, reflecting the meticulous craftsmanship behind the scenes.

Peter Cushing reprised his iconic role as Baron Frankenstein with his usual dedication and intensity. Known for his commitment to performing his own stunts, Cushing’s involvement in the film’s climactic finale was particularly noteworthy. The scene where he swung into the burning laboratory was not without consequence, reportedly resulting in third-degree burns for the veteran actor. Cushing’s performance, marked by his characteristic blend of charm and menace, remained a strong point even as the film faltered in other areas.

A significant aspect of The Evil of Frankenstein was its association with Universal Pictures. This partnership allowed Hammer Films to utilize elements from Universal’s classic Frankenstein series, including the iconic monster design. While this brought a sense of legitimacy and continuity, it also highlighted the film’s struggles to carve out its own identity. The reliance on established tropes and visual cues from Universal’s Frankenstein films, while nostalgic, often felt like a retread rather than a reinvention.

Despite these promising elements, The Evil of Frankenstein ultimately stumbled due to its weak script. The narrative lacked the depth and intrigue that characterized the earlier entries in the series, resulting in a disjointed and uninspired story. The film’s reception reflected this, with audiences and critics finding it a lackluster addition to the Frankenstein mythos. Its poor performance at the box office further cemented its reputation as a misstep for Hammer Films.

The Prognosis:

The Evil of Frankenstein remains a visually stunning yet narratively flawed entry in the Hammer Frankenstein series. Freddie Francis’s directorial prowess and Peter Cushing’s unwavering dedication brought moments of brilliance, but these were not enough to overcome the shortcomings of the script. While it may not stand as a pinnacle of Hammer’s horror legacy, it serves as a testament to the creative risks and collaborations that defined the studio’s golden era.

  • Saul Muerte

Kiss of the Vampire (1963): A Bold Shift in Hammer Horror

27 Saturday Jul 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

In 1963, Hammer Films ventured into new territory with Kiss of the Vampire, directed by Australian filmmaker Don Sharp in his first foray into horror. Known for its atmospheric Gothic settings and a lineage of vampire classics, Hammer Films took a bold step with this feature, diverging from their established formula in notable ways. The result is a film that, while struggling to escape the shadows of its predecessors, laid the groundwork for future Hammer productions and found its own place in the annals of horror cinema.

One of the most striking aspects of Kiss of the Vampire is the absence of Hammer stalwarts Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing. Their iconic portrayals of Count Dracula and Dr. Van Helsing, respectively, had become synonymous with the studio’s vampire offerings. Their absence in this film led to a noticeable shift in tone and dynamics. Without the towering presence of Lee and the steadfast heroism of Cushing, Kiss of the Vampire introduced new faces and a fresh narrative approach.

Director Don Sharp, in his first venture into horror, brought a unique vision to the film. His direction emphasized a blend of horror and subtle comedy, setting a benchmark for future Hammer productions. This slight comical turn provided a distinct flavor, differentiating it from the more intense and serious tone of its predecessors. The film’s plot, revolving around a newlywed couple who stumble upon a vampire cult, allowed Sharp to explore themes of seduction and corruption with a lighter touch.

The cast, featuring Clifford Evans, Edward de Souza, Noel Willman, and Jennifer Daniel, delivered commendable performances. Evans’ portrayal of Professor Zimmer, a vampire hunter with a personal vendetta, offered a new kind of hero for the Hammer repertoire. The absence of Lee and Cushing allowed these actors to shine, and their performances helped to anchor the film’s narrative.

Kiss of the Vampire also set the stage for future Hammer films with its introduction of more elaborate set pieces and special effects. The climactic scene, drawing inspiration from Hitchcock’s The Birds, featured a swarm of bats attacking the vampire cult—a visually striking and memorable conclusion. However, this similarity to The Birds also highlighted the challenges Hammer faced in distinguishing its work from contemporary horror successes.

Hammer Films sought to leverage the popularity of their earlier vampire hits like Dracula and The Brides of Dracula. However, the weight of their own success proved a difficult shadow to escape. Kiss of the Vampire was unable to replicate the same level of impact, partly due to audience expectations and partly because of its less intense approach.

Despite its mixed reception, Kiss of the Vampire remains an important film in Hammer’s catalogue. Its experimental approach to narrative and tone paved the way for more diverse storytelling within the studio’s horror oeuvre. The film’s blend of horror and humour, along with its memorable visual moments, ensured that it would be remembered and even parodied in later works.

The Prognosis:

Kiss of the Vampire is a film that dared to take risks, offering a fresh take on the vampire genre. While it may not have achieved the same iconic status as some of Hammer’s other productions, its influence is undeniable. Don Sharp’s first venture into horror was a bold and commendable effort, marking a significant step in the evolution of Hammer Films.

  • Saul Muerte

Retrospective: Paranoiac (1963)

27 Thursday Jun 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , ,

“Paranoiac” (1963) stands as a remarkable entry in the celebrated canon of Hammer Films, distinguished by its atmospheric tension, expert direction by Freddie Francis, and a standout performance by Oliver Reed. This film, often overshadowed by Hammer’s more renowned horror titles, deserves recognition as a masterful psychological thriller that showcases the studio’s versatility and flair for suspense.

Directed by the illustrious Freddie Francis, “Paranoiac” marks a departure from Hammer’s typical Gothic horror fare, diving instead into the realm of psychological horror with a noir-like elegance. Francis, known for his adept cinematography and visual storytelling, infuses the film with a palpable sense of dread. His direction elevates the narrative, creating a claustrophobic atmosphere that underscores the film’s themes of madness and deception. Francis’s use of stark lighting, intricate framing, and moody shadows enhances the eerie mood, drawing viewers into the twisted world of the Ashby family.

At the heart of “Paranoiac” is Oliver Reed’s enigmatic performance as Simon Ashby. Reed, a staple of British cinema and a frequent collaborator with Hammer, delivers a tour de force portrayal of a deeply troubled character. His Simon is a volatile mix of charm and menace, a man unraveling under the weight of his own psychosis. Reed’s intensity and magnetism command the screen, making Simon a compelling and unpredictable presence. His ability to convey both vulnerability and malevolence adds layers to the character, elevating the film beyond a simple thriller into a complex character study.

Hammer Films, renowned for its ability to produce atmospheric and engaging horror, utilised “Paranoiac” to demonstrate its range. The film, while different in tone from Hammer’s typical supernatural tales, retains the studio’s hallmark craftsmanship. The production design, with its meticulous attention to detail, transforms the Ashby estate into a character in its own right – a place where secrets fester and the past lingers ominously. The film’s score, composed by Elisabeth Lutyens, further enhances the tension, blending haunting melodies with sharp crescendos that mirror the escalating sense of paranoia.

“Paranoiac” also benefits from a tightly woven screenplay by Jimmy Sangster, a frequent Hammer collaborator. Sangster’s script is filled with twists and turns, keeping audiences on edge as the story unravels. The film’s pacing, expertly managed by Francis, ensures that suspense is maintained throughout, leading to a climax that is both shocking and satisfying.

In retrospect, “Paranoiac” can be seen as a crucial piece in the puzzle of Hammer’s filmography. It represents the studio’s willingness to experiment and diversify its output, proving that Hammer could excel outside the confines of traditional horror. The film’s success lies in its ability to blend psychological depth with atmospheric storytelling, creating a work that is as intellectually engaging as it is thrilling.

Freddie Francis’s direction, combined with Oliver Reed’s unforgettable performance, cements “Paranoiac” as a hidden gem worthy of reappraisal. It’s a film that not only stands the test of time but also enriches the legacy of Hammer Films, showcasing the studio’s remarkable ability to craft stories that linger in the mind long after the credits roll. For fans of psychological thrillers and classic cinema alike, “Paranoiac” remains a haunting and essential experience.

  • Saul Muerte

“Unmasking the Gothic Splendor: A Retrospective Review of Hammer’s ‘Phantom of the Opera’ and Its Vibrant Cinematic Palette”

14 Friday Jun 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

Hammer Film Productions, known for their iconic horror films, including their reimagining of classic monsters like Dracula and Frankenstein, ventured into the realm of Gaston Leroux’s “The Phantom of the Opera” in 1962. This adaptation, directed by Terence Fisher, marked their return to Gothic roots after a series of successful ventures into color horror.

The Hammer production of “The Phantom of the Opera” is indeed a fascinating study in the studio’s ability to infuse new life into classic tales. While it may not be as revered as some of their other works, it certainly has its merits.

One of the standout elements of the film is Herbert Lom’s portrayal of the Phantom. Lom brings a sense of tragic depth to the character, capturing both the madness and the humanity of Erik, the Phantom. His performance adds layers of complexity to the role, making the character more than just a one-dimensional villain.

Additionally, the film is notable for its signature Hammer aesthetic. The Gothic atmosphere, lavish sets, and sumptuous costumes create a visually striking world that is unmistakably Hammer. The studio’s expertise in creating atmospheric horror is on full display here, drawing viewers into the eerie world of the Paris Opera House.

One of the prominent aspects of Hammer’s “Phantom of the Opera” is its cinematography and use of rich colour. As the studio transitioned into colour filmmaking, they capitalized on the vibrant palette to enhance the Gothic atmosphere of their productions.

In this film, the cinematography plays a crucial role in creating the mood and tone of the narrative. The use of shadow and light adds depth to the visuals, evoking a sense of mystery and foreboding. The grandiose sets of the Paris Opera House are brought to life through dynamic camera work, capturing the intricacies of the architecture and immersing viewers in the opulent world of the story.

Moreover, the rich color palette employed in the film contributes to its visual allure. Deep, velvety reds, luxurious purples, and haunting blues saturate the screen, heightening the Gothic ambiance and adding to the overall aesthetic appeal. The contrast between the lush colours and the dark shadows creates a visually stunning juxtaposition, underscoring the film’s themes of beauty and darkness.

Hammer’s embrace of color cinematography in “Phantom of the Opera” showcases their commitment to innovation while staying true to their Gothic roots. By leveraging the vibrant hues available to them, the filmmakers create a cinematic experience that is as visually striking as it is thematically resonant. The use of colour becomes an integral part of the storytelling, enhancing the emotional impact of the narrative and immersing audiences in the haunting world of the Phantom.

However, it’s important to acknowledge that the film does have its missteps. Some critics have pointed out inconsistencies in the plot and pacing issues that detract from the overall experience. Additionally, purists may take issue with the liberties taken in adapting Leroux’s novel, as the film deviates from the source material in several key ways.

The Prognosis:

While not without its flaws, Hammer’s “Phantom of the Opera” remains an intriguing entry in the studio’s catalog. It may not reach the heights of some of their other classics, but it still offers a compelling take on a timeless tale, bolstered by strong performances and the studio’s distinctive visual style.

  • Saul Muerte

Captain Clegg (Night Creatures): A Haunting Departure from Hammer’s Traditional Horror

13 Thursday Jun 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , ,

Released in 1962, Hammer Film Productions’ Captain Clegg (also known as Night Creatures) stands as a unique entry in the studio’s illustrious catalogue. Known primarily for their gothic horror films featuring iconic monsters like Dracula, Frankenstein’s creature, and the Mummy, Hammer took a fascinating detour with Captain Clegg, blending swashbuckling adventure with eerie, supernatural elements. This film, while not as instantly recognizable as Hammer’s monster features, is a testament to the studio’s versatility and creativity.

A Departure from Gothic Horror

Captain Clegg deviates from the typical gothic imagery and dark castle settings that defined Hammer’s earlier successes. Instead, it transports viewers to the windswept marshes and coastal villages of 18th century England, a setting more commonly associated with pirate tales than horror stories. This shift in scenery alone sets the film apart, offering a fresh visual palette and a different kind of atmospheric tension.

The film’s plot centers around the enigmatic Reverend Doctor Blyss (Peter Cushing), who harbors a dark secret. By day, he is the respected leader of a quiet coastal village, but by night, he is the infamous pirate Captain Clegg. The arrival of Captain Collier (Patrick Allen) and his band of naval officers to investigate reports of smuggling brings tension and suspense, as Blyss must outwit his adversaries while maintaining his façade.

Blending Pirates with Haunting Mystique

Despite the absence of Hammer’s traditional monsters, Captain Clegg infuses its pirate story with haunting and supernatural undertones. The eerie marsh phantoms—glowing skeletons that ride ghostly horses—create a chilling atmosphere reminiscent of Hammer’s more conventional horror elements. These spectral figures are used to great effect, not just to frighten, but to underscore the film’s themes of deception and hidden identities.

Peter Cushing’s performance is central to the film’s success. As Blyss/Clegg, he masterfully balances charm and menace, embodying a character who is both sympathetic and fearsome. Cushing’s portrayal adds depth to the narrative, highlighting the duality of his character and the thin line between hero and villain.

The film also delves into themes of justice and retribution. Clegg’s transformation from a feared pirate to a community leader reflects a complex moral landscape, where redemption is pursued through dubious means. This moral ambiguity adds a layer of sophistication to the story, elevating it beyond a simple tale of good versus evil.

Atmosphere and Cinematography

The cinematography of Captain Clegg further distinguishes it from Hammer’s earlier works. The film makes excellent use of its coastal setting, with expansive shots of the marshes creating a sense of isolation and foreboding. The nighttime scenes, in particular, are beautifully crafted, using shadows and fog to evoke a ghostly ambiance that complements the film’s supernatural elements.

Director Peter Graham Scott effectively balances action and suspense, ensuring that the film’s pace remains engaging. The sequences involving the marsh phantoms are particularly well-executed, blending practical effects and atmospheric cinematography to create genuinely unsettling moments.

The Prognosis:

Captain Clegg (or Night Creatures) stands out in Hammer Film Productions’ oeuvre as a unique and engaging blend of pirate adventure and supernatural horror. While it may lack the instantly recognizable imagery of the studio’s gothic classics, it compensates with a richly atmospheric setting, complex characters, and a compelling narrative. Peter Cushing’s standout performance and the film’s haunting undertones ensure that Captain Clegg remains a memorable and distinctive entry in Hammer’s filmography. This film is a testament to Hammer’s ability to innovate and experiment within the horror genre, offering audiences a thrilling departure from their traditional fare.

  • Saul Muerte

“Unleashing Terror: The Claws Come Out in Hammer’s Forgotten Gem, ‘Shadow of the Cat’ (1961)!”

25 Saturday May 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , ,

In the shadowy corners of horror cinema history lies a forgotten gem waiting to be rediscovered: “Shadow of the Cat” (1961), a haunting masterpiece from the legendary Hammer Films. While Hammer is often celebrated for its iconic Dracula and Frankenstein films, “Shadow of the Cat” lurks in the shadows, waiting for its moment to shine once more.

Directed by John Gilling, “Shadow of the Cat” is a tale of betrayal, revenge, and feline fury that unfolds with all the Gothic grandeur and chilling atmosphere that Hammer Films is known for. Set in a sprawling English estate, the film follows the sinister machinations of Tabitha, a seemingly innocent house cat who witnesses the murder of her beloved mistress. But Tabitha is no ordinary cat – she’s a creature of vengeance, hell-bent on avenging her owner’s death at the hands of her greedy relatives.

What sets “Shadow of the Cat” apart from other Hammer productions is its unique premise and its unrelenting sense of tension. While the film may lack the supernatural elements of Hammer’s more famous offerings, it more than makes up for it with its gripping storyline and eerie atmosphere. From the menacing shadows that lurk around every corner to the haunting meows of the vengeful Tabitha, “Shadow of the Cat” keeps viewers on the edge of their seats from start to finish.

Of course, no discussion of “Shadow of the Cat” would be complete without mentioning its feline star. Tabitha’s performance is nothing short of mesmerizing, with every flick of her tail and piercing stare conveying a sense of menace and malice that is truly unforgettable. It’s a testament to the skill of the filmmakers that they were able to create such a compelling character out of a simple house cat.

While “Shadow of the Cat” may have been overshadowed by Hammer’s more famous productions, it remains a hidden gem just waiting to be discovered by horror fans old and new. With its gripping storyline, atmospheric setting, and unforgettable feline protagonist, it’s a film that deserves to be remembered as one of Hammer’s finest achievements.

  • Saul Muerte

Retrospective: “The Curse of the Werewolf” (1961) – A Shift in Tone for Hammer Films

16 Thursday May 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , ,

“The Curse of the Werewolf” marked a significant departure for Hammer Films in the 1960s, signaling a shift towards darker, more atmospheric horror. Directed by Terence Fisher and starring Oliver Reed in his breakout role, this film stands as a testament to the studio’s evolution and the enduring impact of its leading actors.

Throughout the 1950s, Hammer Films had gained recognition for its vibrant and often lurid adaptations of classic horror tales, characterized by colorful sets, Gothic atmosphere, and iconic performances from stars like Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing. However, with “The Curse of the Werewolf,” Hammer sought to explore more nuanced and psychologically driven horror, drawing inspiration from classic folklore and mythology.

Renowned for its atmospheric tension and captivating performances, it’s interesting to note that despite its English setting, the film’s source material, Guy Endore’s novel “The Werewolf of Paris,” is actually set in France. This deviation from the original setting doesn’t detract from the film’s effectiveness; rather, it adds a layer of mystery and exoticism to the narrative. The decision to transplant the story to Spain in the film further enhances its uniqueness, offering a fresh perspective on the classic werewolf tale.

Oliver Reed’s portrayal of the tortured protagonist, Leon, marked a turning point in the actor’s career and left an indelible mark on cinema. Reed’s raw intensity and brooding charisma brought depth to the character, elevating him beyond the typical tropes of the werewolf genre. His physicality and magnetic presence captivated audiences, establishing him as one of the most compelling actors of his generation.

“The Curse of the Werewolf” not only showcased Reed’s talent but also demonstrated Hammer’s willingness to push boundaries and experiment with new approaches to horror. The film’s moody atmosphere, evocative cinematography, and tragic narrative set it apart from the studio’s earlier offerings, signaling a maturation of the Hammer brand.

Furthermore, “The Curse of the Werewolf” reflected the changing cultural landscape of the 1960s, with its exploration of themes such as repression, identity, and the struggle between civilization and primal instinct. As society grappled with issues of conformity and rebellion, the film’s central conflict resonated with audiences, offering a potent metaphor for the human condition.

The Prognosis:

“The Curse of the Werewolf” remains a landmark film in the Hammer canon, showcasing the studio’s willingness to evolve and adapt to the shifting tastes of audiences. Oliver Reed’s performance, in particular, stands as a testament to his talent and enduring legacy, solidifying his status as one of cinema’s most iconic figures.

  • Saul Muerte

Podcast: The Curse of the Werewolf (1961)

1960s Horror Retrospective: The Brides of Dracula (1960)

26 Friday Apr 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , ,

As the horror scene began to ramp up in the 1960s and shake the genre to the core with the likes of Psycho and Peeping Tom, British Horror production company, Hammer Films who had made a significant mark during the mid-fifties reinventing classic Universal horror movies such as The Curse of Frankenstein; The Mummy; and Dracula were hardly resting on their laurels or cast to the shadows. At least not yet. Having already brought Baron Frankenstein to the screen with a sequel entitled The Revenge of Frankenstein, Hammer would inevitably turn their attention to the prince of darkness, although curiously, despite Christopher Lee still being attached to the Production company, and a script under the title Dracula the Damned in the works, this idea was shelved in favour of a whole new direction without Lee attached.

The sequel initially under the working title, Disciple of Dracula would centre around another vampire called Baron Meinster. At the outset this script would have another hero in mind called Latour to deal with the Baron but he would soon be curtailed in favour of bringing back Peter Cushing to play the infamous vampire hunter, Van Helsing. This was not an easy task however as Cushing was not immediately enlightened by the script on offer, so another writer, Edward Percy was called in to redraft it before he would sign on the dotted line.

The female lead, Marianne Danielle would be presented to Yvonne Monlaur to play opposite David Peel as Baron Meinster. Amongst the cast would be Freda Jackson (Henry V; David Lean’s Great Expectations) and Maritita Hunt (also Great Expectations as Miss Havisham) bringing an amount of gravitas to the presence on screen.

Once again the always reliable Terence Fisher was at the helm to call the shots and ensure that all things tied together neatly. It would be go-to editor James Needs though who would be congratulated for managing to ensure that the film would meet the deadline cast by Universal. The result would see huge success for The Brides of Dracula, especially in Japan, UK and the States and the thirst for more Dracula stories would be requested, which Hammer was all too keen to oblige. The synergy of all those involved meant that Hammer were at the peak of their success and the 60s would only produce more Gothic-infused horror.

– Saul Muerte

1960s Horror Retrospective

The Flesh and the Fiend

Eyes Without A Face

Peeping Tom

Psycho

The 4 Faces of Hammer’s Dr Jekyll

02 Saturday Mar 2024

Posted by in retrospective

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Across Hammer Films extensive canon of work there have been four adaptations of RL Stevenson’s Gothic tale, Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. Having found success in recreating Universal’s Classic Monster line with adaptations of Frankenstein and Dracula, it would seem logical to turn to another dark tale for inspiration. The mode of choice would fall under scrutiny however by casting English actor Bernard Bresslaw to lead a comic interpretation, called The Ugly Duckling, off the back of their somewhat successful comedy feature, I Only Arsked! Producer Michael Carreras had high hopes for the feature but the box office return would counter his bold prediction with a loss of $20,000.

Their second foray released less than a year later in 1960 would bring Hammer staple Christopher Lee as a supporting role and veteran director Terence Fisher at the helm. The Two Faces of Dr Jekyll would see Paul Massie take on the titular role, experimenting on himself, he turns into his alter ego, Mr. Hyde, a lothario playboy who discovers his friend, Paul (Lee) has been taking advantage of his fortune and stealing the heart of his wife, Kitty (Dawn Addams). Now hellbent on revenge and fury, Jekyll allows Hyde to fuel his energy with a plot to kill Paul.

Despite the combination of Lee and Fisher, the feature failed to ignite the paying public. Lee, who was initially disgruntled at not being offered the lead, actually turns out a decent performance, but surprisingly Fisher’s direction falls flat and fails to connect with screenwriter Cyril Wolf Mankowitz’s vision; Fisher choosing to go with old school formality and adapting the initial intention.

Eagle-eyed viewers however, would spot young up and comer, Oliver Reed as a troublemaker at the Sphynx nightclub.

The choice to alter and cut out certain choices due to time constraints ultimately led to a poor box office return, losing around $30,000. So far, Stevenson’s tale had not proved successful for Hammer and the glow of Hammer Horror was starting to lose its lustre. It would not however deter the British film company from going back to the source material with a third outing released over a decade later in 1971 and starring Hammer’s new flesh and blood leading male, Ralph Bates to take over the mantel from Peter Cushing, mainly due to him taking on the iconic role of Baron Frankenstein. The title of Brian Clemens screenplay, Doctor Jekyll and Sister Hyde was the stuff of Michael Carreras dreams, leaning heavily into the sex and image that Hammer became synonymous with in the seventies.

With model Martine Beswick as the alter ego to Bates’ Dr Jekyll, the piece was played for laughs but would heighten the terror through the guise of womanhood to hide the bloody male persona lurking beneath the feminine exterior. It’s potentially the boldest of directions taken by Hammer’s revisioning of RL Stevenson’s work, and one that was lost on the audience at the time, failing once again to connect. A shame as it holds up well today and still poses an interesting perspective.

The latest incarnation takes the concept one step further with casting Eddie Izzard as a transgender descendant of Dr Jekyll, and could easily have slipped into worrisome terrain had the creatives decided to take the story in a troublesome direction.

Movie Review: Doctor Jekyll (2024)

Thankfully though, the Hammer Films team play it straight and keep the terror to a slow burn rising of fear and dread, never fully knowing where or when evil may strike next.

It’s still early to say whether this version will leave a mark on the audience, but this new Hammer vision that has been orchestrated by new CEO, John Gore promises to lead the infamous horror production company before a modern audience whilst still keeping the tone and flavour of the films of yester-year.

  • Saul Muerte