He always wanted to be special… but he never expected this!
Dust off that VHS, rewind your tape, and step back into the neon-soaked summer of 1985, because Teen Wolf is turning 40. Directed by Rod Daniel, this shaggy slice of high school fantasy is as pure ‘80s as a can of New Coke and a Back to the Future poster on your bedroom wall.
The story is simple but delightfully goofy: Scott Howard (Michael J. Fox), a shy, underdog teen, suddenly finds out he’s inherited a family curse… or gift, depending on your outlook. That’s right, he’s a werewolf—and instead of lurking in the shadows or howling at the moon, he’s dunking basketballs, dancing on car rooftops, and trying to figure out if he wants the popular girl or the one who’s been right there all along.
Looking back, Teen Wolf is by no means a perfect film. The script lopes from corny gags to half-baked teen melodrama, and the makeup effects are more Saturday matinee than spine-chilling horror. But it doesn’t really matter. This isn’t An American Werewolf in London—this is a PG, popcorn-munching time capsule of a decade that adored its offbeat high school comedies.
At the center is Michael J. Fox, riding the stratosphere of his fame after Back to the Future. His charisma and comedic timing are the glue that holds the whole fuzzy package together. Without him, Teen Wolf might have slipped into obscurity, but with him, it became an unlikely box office smash and an MTV-generation touchstone.
The Prognosis:
Four decades on, Teen Wolf still makes you grin. It’s awkward, it’s cheesy, it’s ridiculous—but that’s the charm. From “wolfing out” on the basketball court to that rooftop surfing scene, it wrestles all the nostalgic feels for an upbeat excuse to watch a teenage werewolf slam dunk his way through high school life.
So no, it doesn’t howl with greatness, but like a faded rental box at your local video store, it’s got just enough ‘80s magic to make you hit play one more time.
Saul Muerte
📼 Staff Pick!
“Michael J. Fox plays basketball… as a werewolf. That’s it, that’s the pitch. Totally silly, totally fun, totally ‘80s. Don’t expect scares—expect smiles.”
In an era increasingly defined by bold reinterpretations of classic horror, Franc Roddam’s The Bride set out to breathe new life into Mary Shelley’s time-worn tale — but instead delivered a pallid, porcelain imitation, more concerned with moody stares and billowing curtains than genuine pathos or terror.
Reimagining the legendary final act of Frankenstein, this version begins where most others end: with the creation of a mate for the monster. The titular bride, named Eva and played by Flashdance’s Jennifer Beals, emerges not as a shrieking ghoul but a vision of modern femininity painted onto a Victorian canvas. Alas, neither the character nor the performance holds much electricity. Beals looks the part, but is never granted the depth required to make Eva anything more than an ornament in corsetry.
Sting, in a brooding and bizarrely detached turn as Baron Charles Frankenstein, embodies the film’s cold core. Rather than the obsessed, guilt-ridden creator of Shelley’s vision, Sting’s Frankenstein is a handsome cipher with cheekbones for days and little by way of soul. His descent into obsession with Eva is more about controlling her than loving her, turning what could have been an intriguing exploration of gender roles into a sluggish melodrama.
Clancy Brown fares best as the cast-off monster, who embarks on a tender journey of self-discovery and companionship far away from Frankenstein’s sterile chateau. His scenes with a kind-hearted dwarf are oddly touching, suggesting a much better film that briefly stirs to life before the narrative retreats back to its overwrought romance.
The cast, including Geraldine Page, Cary Elwes, Alexei Sayle, and Phil Daniels, is filled with strong players, but most are reduced to little more than Victorian set dressing. Their performances are engulfed by the film’s overly romanticised production design and languid pacing. One half expects them to melt into the candle wax before they get a meaningful line.
Roddam, best known for Quadrophenia, directs with a painter’s eye but not a horror fan’s heart. The film is lush to look at, but devoid of the dread or existential ache that made Shelley’s original novel and James Whale’s 1935 Bride of Frankenstein such enduring works. By trying to humanise the bride and elevate the material into gothic romance, the film forgets to engage with the monster at its centre — both literal and metaphorical.
The Prognosis:
In the grand laboratory of Frankenstein adaptations, The Bride is an experiment that looks exquisite in still frames but collapses under the weight of its own affected seriousness. There’s poetry in the concept, but very little pulse.
Half a century ago, something strange, spectacular, and undeniably sexy burst out of the lab and onto cinema screens. The Rocky Horror Picture Show, directed by Jim Sharman and based on Richard O’Brien’s 1973 stage musical, was a box office flop upon release. But if you listen closely, you can still hear the echo of fishnets shuffling down the aisles, newspapers crinkling, and toast flying. What began as a gleefully campy homage to B-movies and rock ’n’ roll has become the longest-running theatrical release in film history — a cultural institution whose legacy transcends cinema.
From Stage to Screen
Before Rocky stormed the midnight movie circuit, it was The Rocky Horror Show, a West End stage sensation born in the countercultural crucible of early-’70s London. Created by Richard O’Brien, the musical combined sci-fi schlock, Hammer horror, and glam rock swagger into a tight, taboo-shattering stage production that quickly caught the eye of 20th Century Fox.
The leap to film in 1975 brought along director Jim Sharman and much of the original stage cast, including O’Brien himself. The film version expanded the show’s surrealism with expressionist sets and gaudy Technicolor palettes, but its heart remained the same: unapologetically queer, joyously anarchic, and deliriously fun. At its centre was Tim Curry’s legendary performance as Dr. Frank-N-Furter — a sexually fluid mad scientist from “transsexual Transylvania” — who made seduction, sass, and stilettos feel downright revolutionary.
The Rocky Horror Picture Show didn’t find its audience immediately. But beginning in 1976, it gained traction as a midnight movie, first in New York, then across the U.S. and worldwide. Fans came back week after week, dressed as their favourite characters, shouting lines at the screen, and participating in shadow casts — live performances synced with the film. It wasn’t just watching a movie; it was ritual, rebellion, and release.
Its impact can’t be overstated. Rocky Horror became a safe haven for outsiders, a beacon for the LGBTQ+ community long before mainstream media offered such visibility. It celebrated difference, queerness, camp, and kink with joyous abandon. Few films have made as many people feel seen by being so wonderfully strange.
Where Are They Now?
Tim Curry (Dr. Frank-N-Furter)
Curry’s outrageous performance launched a lifelong career. He went on to star in Clue (1985), Legend (1985), and as the terrifying Pennywise in the 1990 adaptation of It. After a stroke in 2012, he’s remained active in voice work and public appearances, still beloved by generations of fans.
Susan Sarandon (Janet Weiss)
A relatively unknown actor at the time, Sarandon’s star rose fast. She would win an Oscar for Dead Man Walking (1995) and continues to be an outspoken activist and prolific performer.
Barry Bostwick (Brad Majors)
Bostwick built a steady TV and film career, including a long-running role on Spin City. He’s embraced his Rocky past, often appearing at conventions and reunions.
Richard O’Brien (Riff Raff / Writer)
O’Brien remained closely tied to Rocky Horror, penning Shock Treatment (1981), a spiritual sequel. He continues to act, perform, and advocate for trans rights, having come out as gender-fluid in recent years.
Patricia Quinn (Magenta)
Quinn has maintained a cult following and reprised her Rocky role in various fan events. Her distinctive voice still opens every screening with “Science Fiction / Double Feature.”
Meat Loaf (Eddie)
Already a rising rock star, Rocky helped launch Meat Loaf into the stratosphere. His Bat Out of Hell albums became massive hits. He passed away in 2022, leaving behind a legacy as larger-than-life as Eddie himself.
Nell Campbell (Columbia)
Credited as “Little Nell,” Campbell brought jittery energy and a killer tap number to the film. After Rocky, she pursued a career in music, releasing quirky singles and opening a beloved Manhattan nightclub, Nell’s, in the 1980s. Though she stepped back from acting, she remains a cult icon and pops up occasionally in retrospectives.
Charles Gray (The Criminologist)
Already a veteran of stage and screen before Rocky, Gray was known for his commanding voice and steely presence, having appeared in James Bond films like You Only Live Twice and Diamonds Are Forever. His role as the tongue-in-cheek narrator added gravitas and wry comedy to Rocky Horror. He passed away in 2000, leaving behind a legacy of charismatic authority and delicious deadpan.
Jim Sharman (Director)
Sharman continued to direct in theatre and film, but Rocky Horror remains his defining work. His vision helped translate the intimate chaos of the stage show into a cinematic spectacle that has never faded.
Still Sweet, Still Transgressive
Fifty years on, The Rocky Horror Picture Show remains electric. It may be a cultural artifact, but it’s never felt dusty. New generations continue to discover it, claim it, and dress up for midnight screenings. Its message — be yourself, loudly and without shame — is just as vital now as it was in 1975.
Whether you’re watching it for the first time or the five-hundredth, there’s always a reason to return to that spooky old castle. After all, like the man said — don’t dream it, be it.
Released at the turn of the millennium, Hollow Man promised a slick, effects-driven update on the classic H.G. Wells tale of invisible terror. With Paul Verhoeven at the helm—then still riding high off a string of bold, provocative genre films—and a high-profile cast including Kevin Bacon, Elisabeth Shue, Josh Brolin, and Kim Dickens, the ingredients were there for something groundbreaking. But 25 years later, Hollow Man feels less like a bold new direction and more like a misstep for one of cinema’s most iconoclastic directors.
The film follows brilliant but arrogant scientist Sebastian Caine (Bacon), who, obsessed with achieving the impossible, volunteers himself for an invisibility experiment that—shock—actually works. When the reversal proves ineffective, Caine slowly descends into unchecked id, using his newfound power for voyeurism, violence, and ultimately, murder. While the premise has classic sci-fi horror bones, Hollow Man seems content to coast on digital wizardry and B-movie sleaze rather than dig into the existential or psychological possibilities it flirts with.
For Verhoeven, a director never shy about subversion or satire, this was a surprising step into formula. After electrifying audiences with RoboCop(1987), Total Recall (1990), and the now-iconic (and initially maligned) Starship Troopers (1997), Verhoeven had made a name for himself as a master provocateur—balancing exploitation with critique, violence with intellect. Even his divisive Showgirls(1995) has been reappraised as audacious camp. Hollow Man, by contrast, is stripped of that sly intelligence, reduced to a glossy, FX-heavy thriller that seems to misunderstand its own potential.
That’s not to say the film is without merit. The visual effects—cutting edge for the time—were rightly praised, earning the film an Academy Award nomination. Bacon brings a creepy physicality to the role, especially once he’s rendered literally faceless. And Shue, Brolin, and Dickens do their best to ground a story that frequently loses interest in its characters the moment they’re not running or screaming. But the screenplay fails them, turning complex performers into disposable archetypes.
What’s most disappointing is how Hollow Man wastes its central conceit. The idea of invisibility as a metaphor for unchecked power, surveillance, and toxic masculinity is timely, but the film barely scratches at these themes. Instead, it leans into tired genre tropes—gratuitous nudity, generic lab-coat dialogue, and a final act that plays like a subpar slasher in a science lab. Verhoeven’s usual satirical edge is dulled here, replaced by something far more conventional and far less daring.
Looking back, Hollow Man marks the end of Verhoeven’s Hollywood phase—a seven-film run filled with wild highs and chaotic experiments. He would return to Europe for more introspective, boundary-pushing work (Black Book, Elle, Benedetta), suggesting that the rigid machinery of American studio filmmaking had finally worn him down.
The Prognosis:
Two decades on, Hollow Man stands as a footnote in an otherwise fascinating career: not quite terrible but deeply underwhelming. For a director who once gave us corrupt cops, brain-busting rebels, and fascist bugs, an invisible man never felt so forgettable.
In 1985, just when vampires were beginning to lose their bite on the big screen, Tom Holland’s Fright Night sunk its fangs into the horror genre and reminded audiences that there was still plenty of blood to spill—and fun to be had. A perfect blend of teen horror, gothic atmosphere, and creature feature camp, Fright Night has grown into a bona fide cult classic over the last four decades, still beloved by fans who remember the thrill of peering across the street and suspecting something sinister.
The premise is simple but delicious: Charley Brewster (William Ragsdale), a horror-obsessed teenager, becomes convinced that his suave new neighbour, Jerry Dandrige (Chris Sarandon), is a vampire. With no one taking him seriously, Charley turns to Peter Vincent (Roddy McDowall), a fading TV horror host and self-proclaimed vampire killer, to help him save the neighbourhood—and maybe his soul.
Fright Night succeeds largely because of Holland’s tight script and keen understanding of horror’s twin engines: fear and fun. Having already written Psycho II, Holland would go on to further solidify his genre cred with Child’s Play and Thinner, but Fright Night was his directorial debut—and what a confident debut it was. Holland didn’t just direct a horror movie; he celebrated horror, showing a deep affection for both Hammer-style gothic tropes and the glossier, MTV-tinged teen fare of the era.
But the film’s enduring charm rests heavily on the shoulders of two impeccable performances. Chris Sarandon gives Jerry Dandrige a dangerously seductive presence, equal parts Dracula and disco-era predator. His layered performance oozes charm and menace, playing the vampire as both creature and corrupter, a predator who thrives on the unspoken fears of suburbia. Opposite him, Roddy McDowall brings gravitas and melancholy to Peter Vincent, a character who could’ve easily been a joke. Instead, McDowall turns him into a tragic hero—washed up, afraid, but still brave enough to step into the darkness one more time.
The film also boasts some wonderfully grotesque creature effects courtesy of FX maestro Richard Edlund and a killer synth-driven score that helped cement its place in 1980s horror iconography. Whether it’s Evil Ed’s unhinged transformation or the classic vampire seduction scenes, Fright Night knows how to stage a memorable set piece.
While it might not have the mainstream status of other 1980s horror franchises, Fright Night holds a unique place in the horror pantheon. It’s a love letter to the genre’s past and a savvy, stylish entry in the wave of horror that was reshaping itself for a younger, hipper audience.
The Prognosis:
Forty years on, Fright Night remains a fan favourite—not just for its scares or its effects, but because it understands what horror fans crave: the thrill of being afraid and the joy of watching someone finally believe the impossible. You’re so cool, Brewster—and so is Fright Night.
John Fawcett’s Ginger Snaps didn’t just scratch the surface of werewolf mythology—it tore it open with claws bared and blood pumping. Released in 2000, this Canadian cult classic has only grown more potent with age, remaining one of the most subversive and emotionally intelligent horror films of its era. On its 25th anniversary, it stands as a feral, feminist reimagining of the werewolf tale—one that howls with rage, fear, and liberation.
Set in the eerily sterile suburb of Bailey Downs, the film follows death-obsessed sisters Ginger and Brigitte Fitzgerald (played ferociously by Katharine Isabelle and Emily Perkins), whose bond is as intense as it is co-dependent. Their world fractures when Ginger is attacked by a lycanthropic creature the very night she gets her first period. Suddenly, the dreaded “curse” of womanhood becomes something monstrous—literally.
The brilliance of Ginger Snaps lies in how it treats this transformation not just as a horror trope, but as an allegory for puberty, burgeoning sexuality, and the loss of control over one’s body. It’s body horror with a purpose. Rather than using menstruation as a throwaway symbol, the film makes it central to the werewolf metaphor, equating monthly cycles with cycles of aggression, lust, and emotional volatility. In doing so, Ginger Snaps flips the male-dominated script of traditional lycanthropy and centres it around the female experience—raw, honest, and terrifying.
Fawcett and screenwriter Karen Walton crafted something rare: a genre film that respects the complexity of girlhood. There’s no glossing over the grotesque. Ginger’s transformation isn’t romanticised—it’s sticky, hormonal, confusing, and violent. Yet the emotional core never slips away, thanks to the powerhouse pairing of Isabelle and Perkins. Isabelle gives Ginger a defiant sexual energy laced with danger, while Perkins plays Brigitte with quiet resolve, watching her sister spiral into predatory chaos. Their dynamic anchors the film even as it spirals into full-on carnage.
What also sets Ginger Snaps apart is its refusal to give easy answers. Brigitte’s desperate attempts to “cure” Ginger—through science, through loyalty, through love—reflect the painful reality of growing apart, of watching someone you care about become a version of themselves you no longer recognise. The climax isn’t just about killing the beast—it’s about letting go.
In the decades since its release, Ginger Snaps has rightfully earned a reputation as a trailblazing entry in horror cinema. It paved the way for more female-led and body-conscious genre films like Teeth, Raw, and Jennifer’s Body. But few have matched its emotional intelligence, wicked sense of humour, or unflinching approach to the terrors of adolescence.
The Prognosis:
25 years on, Ginger Snaps is still snarling, still bleeding, and still refusing to conform. And thank God for that.
Roger Corman’s original The Wasp Woman (1959) was never a masterpiece, but it had the scrappy charm of classic B-horror: a cautionary tale about vanity, science gone wrong, and insectoid terror delivered with modest ambition and low-budget flair. In contrast, Jim Wynorski’s 1995 remake loses almost all of that charm in its attempt to modernise the story—with more gore, more sleaze, and far less soul.
The story remains essentially the same: Janice Starlin, the head of a struggling cosmetics company, turns to experimental science in a desperate bid to reclaim her youth. This time, though, queen wasp enzymes are the miracle solution—and, inevitably, the curse. The difference lies in the execution. Where the original offered a blend of camp and caution, this remake leans into exploitation and cliché, trading subtext for skin and suspense for schlock.
Jennifer Rubin, known for her work in A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors, does her best with the material. Her presence adds a certain credibility to a film that otherwise doesn’t earn it. Rubin is no stranger to genre work, and she brings an edge to Janice that hints at deeper conflict—aging, ambition, power—but the script barely lets her explore it before she’s buried under prosthetics and one-liners. It’s a waste of a talented actress who once embodied one of the most memorable “final girls” of the late ’80s.
Jim Wynorski, a veteran of low-budget exploitation fare, directs with his usual blend of tongue-in-cheek irreverence and no-frills staging. But here, the tone is muddled. Is it trying to be scary? Sexy? Satirical? The result feels more like a late-night cable filler than a worthy homage or meaningful reinvention. The practical effects are forgettable, the kills are uninspired, and the transformation sequences lack the grotesque creativity that could have elevated the film’s creature-feature potential.
The Prognosis:
The Wasp Woman (1995) squanders its B-movie legacy in favour of shallow thrills and thin plotting. Jennifer Rubin deserved better. So did the wasp.
The Skeleton Key is a film that promises a lot with its premise but struggles under the weight of its own molasses-thick mood. Set against the dripping, decaying backdrop of a Louisiana bayou mansion, it’s a Southern Gothic with all the right ingredients: hoodoo folklore, a sprawling plantation with secrets behind every door, and a protagonist slowly unraveling a mystery that’s bigger than she realises. And yet, despite that, the result feels strangely flat—more a whisper than a scream.
Kate Hudson, coming off the high of Almost Famous, takes a sharp turn into serious horror territory as Caroline, a hospice nurse who takes a job caring for an elderly man in a crumbling estate just outside New Orleans. While the role may seem like a bid for dramatic reinvention, she holds her own, maintaining a grounded presence even as the film dips into increasingly supernatural waters. It’s a far cry from her usual rom-com terrain, and while the script doesn’t give her much emotional range to explore, she carries the material with competence. Peter Sarsgaard and Gena Rowlands offer solid support, though both feel like they’re keeping one eye on the script and the other on the exit.
Visually, the film does the heavy lifting. The cinematography leans hard into shadowy corridors, candlelit rituals, and waterlogged tension. Director Iain Softley succeeds in conjuring a sense of dread, but he doesn’t quite know what to do with it. The pacing is painfully slow, dragging through the second act like it’s knee-deep in swamp water. When the final twist comes—an admittedly gutsy one—it’s more of a surprise than a payoff, and by then, the viewer’s attention may have already wandered.
There’s an intriguing idea buried in The Skeleton Key—about belief as a form of power, and the lingering rot of American racial and spiritual history—but it never quite rises above its aesthetic. The film wants to be smart horror, but it lacks the narrative snap to match its atmospheric bite.
The Prognosis:
The Skeleton Key is a moody, fog-drenched thriller that starts strong but never shakes off its torpor. Hudson gives it her best, but the film gets lost in its own slow-boiled murk.
Arguably Hammer’s darkest Frankenstein entry, this time Peter Cushing’s Baron is more villain than anti-hero, orchestrating blackmail, body-snatching, and worse. Fisher brings a chilly intensity, and the film’s cold-blooded tone marks a grim evolution in the studio’s legacy. It’s intelligent, brutal, and emotionally bleak.
#29. Horrors of Malformed Men (1969, dir. Teruo Ishii) ★★★½
A nightmarish swirl of Edogawa Rampo adaptations and Ishii’s unique perversity, this Japanese cult classic was banned for decades. Full of surreal grotesquerie, body horror, and identity confusion, it’s a fever dream drenched in taboo. Not for the faint-hearted, but a fascinating genre provocation.
Christopher Lee returns (wordless, no less) in this elegant continuation of Hammer’s Dracula mythos. While the pacing is deliberate, the imagery is stunning, and Lee’s physical performance makes Dracula all the more monstrous. An important sequel that cemented the Count’s terrifying legacy.
Hammer’s finest foray into Satanic horror, led by a commanding Christopher Lee performance as the heroic Duc de Richleau. Black masses, possession, and a tense battle of good vs. evil play out in bold, colourful fashion. Elevated by Richard Matheson’s script and Lee’s conviction.
#26. Viy (1967, dir. Konstantin Ershov & Georgi Kropachyov) ★★★½
The first Soviet-era horror film, Viy is a folk tale brought to glorious life. A seminary student must spend three nights in a chapel with a witch’s corpse, leading to unforgettable supernatural chaos. Innovative effects and bizarre imagery make this a true one-of-a-kind.
Aliens, gore, and political subtext crash-land in this wild Japanese sci-fi horror hybrid. A hijacked plane, a crashed UFO, and gooey body possession form the backbone of a sharp, cynical allegory about humanity’s self-destruction. Vivid, vicious, and wonderfully unhinged.
Three Poe tales, three Price performances. From the lugubrious “Morella” to the boozy brilliance of “The Black Cat,” this anthology shows Corman and Price at their most playful. Peter Lorre steals the middle segment, but the whole film is stylish, macabre fun.
One of Corman’s finest. Vincent Price gives a tormented turn as a man unraveling in a Spanish castle haunted by murder and legacy. Lavish set design, expressionistic visuals, and a killer twist ending mark this as a highlight of the AIP-Poe cycle.
Joan Crawford wields an axe in this deliciously over-the-top slasher prototype. Playing with themes of madness, motherhood, and misdirection, Castle delivers more than gimmicks here. Crawford’s performance is both unhinged and heartbreaking—a camp classic with surprising depth.
A deeply strange and haunting occult thriller with an aristocratic chill. Starring Deborah Kerr, David Niven, and a hypnotic Sharon Tate, the film channels folk horror vibes before it was fashionable. Mysterious rituals and fatalism make this a forgotten gem worth resurrecting.
Part 5: #20–11 – The Heavy Hitters of Horror’s New Age coming soon.
Haunted Villages, Ghost Cats, and Supernatural Schemes
With entries #50 to #41, we move deeper into international territory and find horror leaning into psychological dread, tragic spirits, and doomed villages. From Korea to Italy and Japan to the American heartland, the genre flexes new muscles as it breaks further from its gothic roots.
Vincent Price headlines this adaptation of a lesser-known Guy de Maupassant tale. Possessed by a malevolent invisible entity, Price delivers delicious monologues while descending into madness. Though it never reaches the heights of his Poe roles, it’s an eerie morality tale worth rediscovering.
A fine example of Japan’s kaibyō eiga (ghost cat) subgenre, this film blends folktale with supernatural horror as a feline spirit exacts vengeance from beyond the grave. Eerie, painterly visuals and a chilling atmosphere elevate a haunting revenge story.
Hammer tried something a little different with this Dracula-adjacent tale, absent of Cushing and Lee but enriched with occult elements, eerie visuals, and a batty finale. Australian director Don Sharp lends a confident hand, offering a vampiric tale both eerie and off-kilter.
Hammer’s take on Leroux’s classic replaces horror with pathos, casting Herbert Lom as a sympathetic Phantom. Visually impressive with strong performances, but it lacks the menace of its Universal predecessor. Still, a noteworthy variation on a familiar tragedy.
A controversial and stylish piece of Italian gothic horror featuring necrophilia, fog-drenched corridors, and morbid obsession. Barbara Steele is riveting as always, while Freda crafts an atmosphere of inescapable decay. More perverse than terrifying, but unforgettable.
A proto-psychological thriller from South Korea that slides from domestic drama into full-blown horror. A manipulative housemaid destabilizes a middle-class household in a tale of infidelity, class, and control. Tense, tragic, and way ahead of its time.
A lavish Poe anthology boasting segments from three European auteurs. Jane Fonda stuns in Vadim’s “Metzengerstein,” Malle brings eerie tension in “William Wilson,” but it’s Fellini’s phantasmagoric “Toby Dammit” that steals the show. A decadent, surreal trip.
Italy’s answer to Hammer’s gothic boom. A mysterious sculptor uses a creepy windmill and his statuesque creations to cover a darker secret. Gorgeously shot and dripping with atmosphere, it’s a Euro-horror delight that deserves more love.
Also known as Burn, Witch, Burn!, this British occult thriller follows a rational professor who discovers his wife is secretly using magic to protect him. Smartly written with creeping suspense and a strong anti-rationalist message. Low on gore, high on tension.
An atmospheric gem often overshadowed by bigger titles. Christopher Lee lures a student into a New England town still ruled by witches. Fog, cobblestone, and stark monochrome make for a chilling morality tale steeped in black magic.
Surgeons of Horror 